November 2010 - mingw - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 502690] Review Request: mingw32-dirac - MinGW Windows dirac compression library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502690 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |tibbs(a)math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2010-11-05 13:54:43 EDT --- I'm trying to take care of the oldest of the review tickets; I had to learn about mingw32 before I could look at this. Outside of the spec having several bits which are unnecessary with modern Fedora (BuildRoot:, cleaning of buildroot in %install, the entire %clean section) which you can remove if you like, this package looks fine. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 816b16f18d235ff8ccd40d95fc5b4fad61ae47583e86607932929d70bf1f00fd dirac-1.0.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * version packaged is the same as the native Fedora version. * package is noarch. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * special mingw32 dependency generators are used. * final provides and requires are sane: mingw32(libdirac_decoder-0.dll) mingw32(libdirac_encoder-0.dll) mingw32-dirac = 1.0.2-2.fc15 = mingw32-filesystem >= 62 mingw32-runtime mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32(libdirac_decoder-0.dll) mingw32(libdirac_encoder-0.dll) mingw32(libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll) mingw32(libstdc++-6.dll) mingw32(msvcrt.dll) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no static libraries. * .dll and .def files in _mingw32_bindir * .dll.a and .la files in _mingw32_libdir * dll files are listed explicitly in %files. * libraries and executables are stripped properly. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 641429] Review Request: mingw32-dbus - MinGW Windows port of DBus

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641429 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2010-11-05 13:23:22 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 529560] Review Request: mingw32-libvorbis - MinGW build of the libvorbis Vorbis General Audio Compression Codec library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529560 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mihai(a)limbasan.ro | |) --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2010-11-05 09:18:16 EDT --- Your package submissions still build and they seem to me to be clean, but before putting in any review work I'd like to ask, since it's been over a year since anyone has looked at them, if you're still interested in submitting them. Please let me know; if so I'll try to move forward with reviews and sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 641429] Review Request: mingw32-dbus - MinGW Windows port of DBus

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641429 --- Comment #9 from Ivan Romanov <drizt(a)land.ru> 2010-11-05 09:14:37 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-dbus Short Description: MinGW Windows port of DBus Owners: ivanromanov Branches: f14 InitialCC: ivanromanov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 641429] Review Request: mingw32-dbus - MinGW Windows port of DBus

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641429 Ivan Romanov <drizt(a)land.ru> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 641429] Review Request: mingw32-dbus - MinGW Windows port of DBus

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641429 --- Comment #8 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2010-11-05 07:39:28 EDT --- As the package is now approved, you can request a GIT repository and upload the .spec file there. Instructions for this can be found at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 468997] binaryinfo-readelf-failed in MinGW packages

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468997 --- Comment #8 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2010-11-04 07:43:40 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 12. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '12'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 502206] conflicting typedef (failed ifdef) in jas_types.h

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502206 --- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2010-11-04 07:12:59 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 12. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '12'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 509940] Cmake can't build sdl program with mingw32

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509940 --- Comment #11 from Bug Zapper <fedora-triage-list(a)redhat.com> 2010-11-04 06:51:20 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 12. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '12'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 641429] Review Request: mingw32-dbus - MinGW Windows port of DBus

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=641429 Ivan Romanov <drizt(a)land.ru> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #455234|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #7 from Ivan Romanov <drizt(a)land.ru> 2010-11-03 20:25:56 EDT --- Created attachment 457623 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=457623 Corrected mingw32-dbus.spec #3 Thank you. I fixed spelling error and added tarball description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw November 2010