mingw May 2010

mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org

9 participants
32 discussions

Fwd: Goocanvas for Mingw32
by Richard W.M. Jones 28 Jan '12

28 Jan '12

Thanks Egil, I am forwarding your message and the spec file to the fedora-mingw mailing list. I looked quickly over the spec file and it looks good. Rich. ----- Forwarded message from Egil Kvaleberg <egil(a)kvaleberg.com> ----- Subject: Goocanvas for Mingw32 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:54:27 +0200 From: Egil Kvaleberg <egil(a)kvaleberg.com> To: rjones(a)redhat.com I have played around with the Mingw32 for Fedora, and it absolutely seems like a very cool thing. For my purposes, I am using GTK2, which is supported, but I also need a canvas. I have been using Goocanvas (not sure what really is *the* canvas for GTK2, but I have been happy with Goocanvas). However, a Goocanvas package does not seem to be available, so I built one. Goocanvas may be of interest to others, so if you think it is suitable then please use the attached spec-file or tell me how to get involved. The spec-file for Fedora 11 is attached. Sincerely, Egil Kvaleberg -- Company: Kvaleberg AS Office: +47 22 44 31 75 Mobile: +47 920 22 780 Fax: +47 22 44 46 77 Web: http://www.kvaleberg.com/ ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v

3 4

[Bug 489100] New: No cross-DLL exceptions in mingw32 compilers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Dec '11

29 Dec '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: No cross-DLL exceptions in mingw32 compilers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489100 Summary: No cross-DLL exceptions in mingw32 compilers Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: mingw32-gcc AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: wolfgang.glas(a)ev-i.at QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Version 4.3.2-12 of EPEL's version of the moingw32 cross-compiler do not support cross-DLL exceptions. I've attached the gcc bug report below. This make running a non-trivial C++ program impossible an renders the mingw32 toolchain unusable for real-world C++ programs. The mingw-w64 toolchain has solved this problem by supplying a shared libgcc, hopefully the mingw32 toolchain will follow this approach in the near future. Please keep on your tremendous work on providing the ming32 toolchain in the EPEL. TIA, Wolfgang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 571686] New: mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 May '11

18 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686 Summary: mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-filesystem AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: waananen(a)nbi.dk QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Even if the specfile includes: %define __strip %{_mingw32_strip} mingw32 cross-compiled packages does not get their DLL's or binaries stripped. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Checked with: mingw32-filesystem-56-1 How reproducible: Very easy to reproduce by building a mingw32 package. Also official Fedora mingw32 packages are not stripped either - I tested the package: mingw32-pixman-0.14.0-1.fc11. Steps to Reproduce: 1. cp -p /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll /tmp 2. i686-pc-mingw32-strip /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll Actual results: # ls -1s /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll 252 /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll 1252 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll Expected results: # ls -1s /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll 252 /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll 252 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

nspr: fix for mock build
by Amorilia 07 May '11

07 May '11

Hi everyone, Here's a fix for the build problem for nspr in mock: http://github.com/amorilia/fedora-mingw/commit/1c143a5840bb15b11098edb7130e… It seems that the problem goes back all the way to AC_PROG_CC: when wine is installed, apparently AC_PROG_CC (mistakenly?) sets cross_compiler to false. Additionally, here's a sync of the spec file with the native fedora one, and a few extra build patches: http://github.com/amorilia/fedora-mingw/commit/19af2a48f6d2cc90009c581a7e8a… http://github.com/amorilia/fedora-mingw/commit/629eb75b24e1755c92041b614b40… http://github.com/amorilia/fedora-mingw/commit/44031e8cf4d0149debeb97c0c833… Although the tests build, when running them under wine, many fail. I haven't investigated this further. I don't plan to work on this anymore for the time being, so I'm simply throwing these patches here in case someone else would be interested. For quick reference, full spec file and patches: http://github.com/amorilia/fedora-mingw/tree/master/nspr/ Yours, Amorilia

2 1

[Bug 499992] New: Review Request: mingw32-WebKit - MinGW Windows web content engine library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '10

17 Dec '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-WebKit - MinGW Windows web content engine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-WebKit - MinGW Windows web content engine library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Depends on: 499983,499986,499991 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-WebKit.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-WebKit-1.1.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: WebKit is an open source web browser engine. Koji scratch build: none for now because mingw32-libsoup, mingw32-libxslt and mingw32-libidn aren't in Fedora yet Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 29

[Bug 539698] New: debuginfo package conflict between binutils and mingw32-binutils
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Dec '10

04 Dec '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: debuginfo package conflict between binutils and mingw32-binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539698 Summary: debuginfo package conflict between binutils and mingw32-binutils Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: mingw32-binutils AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jarin.franek(a)post.cz QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Trying to install both binutils debuginfo and mingw32-binutils debuginfo packages (In fact, I did install debuginfo for the whole distribution). The transaction check fails with a conflict. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-binutils-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 binutils-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 How reproducible: see the steps: Steps to Reproduce: 1. debuginfo-install binutils 2. debuginfo-install mingw32-binutils Actual results: ----------------------------------------snippet Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/bfd/elf.c from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/bfd/elfcode.h from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/bfd/section.c from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/gas/dw2gencfi.c from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/ld/ldmain.c from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 Error Summary ------------- ----------------------------------------snippet Expected results: No conflict. Since both binutils and mingw32-binutils install in-parallel without problems, I would expect their debuginfo packages to install in-parallel as well. Additional info: May concern other mingw32-* packages as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 595006] New: mingw32-dlfcn-static libdl.a has no index
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Dec '10

03 Dec '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw32-dlfcn-static libdl.a has no index https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595006 Summary: mingw32-dlfcn-static libdl.a has no index Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-dlfcn AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: stebbins(a)jetheaddev.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: When attempting to link with libdl.a this error occurs: /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libdl.a: could not read symbols: Archive has no index; run ranlib to add one Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Release : 0.7.r11.fc12 Steps to Reproduce: 1. gcc -static somefile.c -o some.exe -ldl Additional info: running ranlib fixes the problem: # i686-pc-mingw32-ranlib libdl.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

[Bug 508746] New: noarch MinGW debuginfo packages don't get placed in the debuginfo repository
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Oct '10

13 Oct '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: noarch MinGW debuginfo packages don't get placed in the debuginfo repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508746 Summary: noarch MinGW debuginfo packages don't get placed in the debuginfo repository Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mash AssignedTo: notting(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, jkeating(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora This bug was originally reported at the rel-eng trac ( https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1949 ), but I was asked to report this here: A few days ago we (the Fedora MinGW SIG) started experimenting with generating -debuginfo subpackages for our libraries. For this we've created some custom scripts to strip out debug information to separate files and added some RPM macro's to create -debuginfo subpackages containing these files. This has been discussed at http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-June/001748.html The RPM scripts were added in mingw32-filesystem-52-1.fc12 and some of our regular MinGW packages were rebuild as can be seen at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=111400 After waiting for the next rawhide push we discovered that the mingw32-glib2-debuginfo subpackage wasn't published in the rawhide-debuginfo repository. We think it's caused by the fact that our mingw32 packages are noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 504782] New: libpng: Interlaced Images Information Disclosure Vulnerability
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Aug '10

04 Aug '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: libpng: Interlaced Images Information Disclosure Vulnerability https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504782 Summary: libpng: Interlaced Images Information Disclosure Vulnerability Product: Security Response Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: source=gentoo,reported=20090606,public=20090604,impact =low? Keywords: Security Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: vulnerability AssignedTo: security-response-team(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: thoger(a)redhat.com CC: paul(a)city-fan.org, lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, tgl(a)redhat.com, berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Other Target Release: --- Quoting Secunia advisory SA35346: http://secunia.com/advisories/35346/ A vulnerability has been reported in libpng, which can be exploited by malicious people to disclose potentially sensitive information. The vulnerability is caused due to an error when processing 1-bit interlaced images. This can be exploited to disclose uninitialised memory via specially crafted images having widths that are not divisible by 8. The vulnerability is reported in versions prior to 1.2.37. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 21

[Bug 481433] New: w32api 3.13 dropped libglut32.a, we should package glut
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Jun '10

28 Jun '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: w32api 3.13 dropped libglut32.a, we should package glut https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481433 Summary: w32api 3.13 dropped libglut32.a, we should package glut Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-w32api AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: rjones(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- As described here: http://www.mail-archive.com/cygwin-apps@cygwin.com/msg21163.html libglut32.a was dropped from the latest w32api package. Some of our packages depend on this. It seems the right way to do this is to package glut as a separate RPM. Note that SGI glut has a possibly non-free license, but there is a workalike called freeglut that we can use instead. http://freeglut.sourceforge.net/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw May 2010