mingw July 2010

mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
49 discussions

[Bug 608644] CVE-2010-2249 libpng: Memory leak when processing Physical Scale (sCAL) images
by Red Hat Bugzilla 26 Jul '10

26 Jul '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608644 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2010-07-26 22:49:52 EDT --- mingw32-libpng-1.2.44-1.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 613993] Review Request: mingw32-celt051 - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Jul '10

25 Jul '10

1 0

[Bug 613993] Review Request: mingw32-celt051 - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Jul '10

25 Jul '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613993 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2010-07-25 17:33:48 EDT --- $ rpmlint mingw32-celt051.spec mingw32-celt051.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install mingw32-celt051.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean mingw32-celt051.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag mingw32-celt051.spec: W: no-%clean-section 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. - Please fix the rpmlint warnings mentioned above - Please use %global instead of %define for all the macros at the top of the .spec file - Please add a comment about the purpose of the patch - Please use 'make %{?_smp_mflags}' instead of just 'make' - Please use a complete file list instead of %{_mingw32_libdir}/libcelt051* as the * masks the fact that only a static library is bundled - Is it correct that this package only provides a static library and no shared library (DLL)? Shared libraries are preferred in Fedora. If shared libraries aren't supported by upstream (and upstream doesn't want to support this), please move all files to a -static subpackage and make the main package require the -static subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 614047] Review Request: mingw32-spice-protocol - Spice protocol header files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Jul '10

25 Jul '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614047 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2010-07-25 16:35:00 EDT --- One other thing, the BuildRequires: autoconf automake can be dropped as the configure script doesn't need to be rebuilt. The BuildRequires: mingw32-binutils and mingw32-gcc can also be dropped as nothing gets compiled in this package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 614047] Review Request: mingw32-spice-protocol - Spice protocol header files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Jul '10

25 Jul '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614047 Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> 2010-07-25 16:20:32 EDT --- $ rpmlint mingw32-spice-protocol.spec mingw32-spice-protocol.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install mingw32-spice-protocol.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean mingw32-spice-protocol.spec: W: no-buildroot-tag mingw32-spice-protocol.spec: W: no-%clean-section 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. - Please fix the rpmlint warnings mentioned above - Please use %global instead of %define for all the macros at the top of the .spec file - Please use %defattr(,-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 614047] Review Request: mingw32-spice-protocol - Spice protocol header files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Jul '10

25 Jul '10

1 0

[Bug 613993] Review Request: mingw32-celt051 - An audio codec for use in low-delay speech and audio communication
by Red Hat Bugzilla 25 Jul '10

25 Jul '10

1 0

dllimport and initialization issue
by Michael Cronenworth 22 Jul '10

22 Jul '10

This code compiles with no errors or warnings: __attribute__ ((dllimport)) int _fmode; This code does not compile: __attribute__ ((dllimport)) int _fmode = _O_BINARY; foo.c:123: error: variable '_fmode' definition is marked dllimport foo.c:123: warning: '_fmode' redeclared without dllimport attribute: previous dllimport ignored Am I doing something horribly wrong or is this a gcc bug? rpm -q mingw32-gcc mingw32-gcc-4.4.2-2.fc13.x86_64 Thanks, Michael

2 4

[Bug 467418] Review Request: mingw32-libvirt - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Jul '10

19 Jul '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418 --- Comment #9 from Daniel Berrange <berrange(a)redhat.com> 2010-07-19 13:11:02 EDT --- The original review src RPM is horrifically out of date. This is the latest from upstream: http://berrange.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-libvirt/mingw32-libvirt-0.8… http://berrange.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-libvirt/mingw32-libvirt.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 467418] Review Request: mingw32-libvirt - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Jul '10

16 Jul '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418 --- Comment #8 from Ryan O'Hara <rohara(a)redhat.com> 2010-07-16 15:41:46 EDT --- Just a heads up that mingw32-portablexdr is build and the packages are waiting for review. See the BZ below. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw July 2010