November 2012 - mingw - Fedora mailing-lists

[mingw-pixman/f18] Update to 0.26.2
by Erik van Pienbroek 21 Nov '12

21 Nov '12

Summary of changes: 0ff2487... Update to 0.26.2 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent

1 0

[mingw-pixman] Update to 0.26.2
by Erik van Pienbroek 21 Nov '12

21 Nov '12

commit 0ff24874f15b6d4ad5bcd3c3ade6eb7ee159655d Author: Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> Date: Wed Nov 21 23:44:35 2012 +0100 Update to 0.26.2 .gitignore | 1 + mingw-pixman.spec | 10 +++++----- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 54eb62e..80e011e 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ pixman-0.18.2.tar.bz2 /pixman-0.22.2.tar.gz /pixman-0.24.2.tar.gz /pixman-0.24.4.tar.gz +/pixman-0.26.2.tar.gz diff --git a/mingw-pixman.spec b/mingw-pixman.spec index ba9e4a9..22cecc6 100644 --- a/mingw-pixman.spec +++ b/mingw-pixman.spec @@ -1,11 +1,8 @@ %?mingw_package_header -%global mingw_build_win32 1 -%global mingw_build_win64 1 - Name: mingw-pixman -Version: 0.24.4 -Release: 4%{?dist} +Version: 0.26.2 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: MinGW Windows Pixman library License: MIT @@ -106,6 +103,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name "*.la" -delete %changelog +* Wed Nov 21 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.26.2-1 +- Update to 0.26.2 + * Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering <rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> - 0.24.4-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild diff --git a/sources b/sources index 15e4af0..2854abc 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1 @@ -fee074965c310c46d9c0ab3e5fd656bf pixman-0.24.4.tar.gz +276242da5b3af1258d072cf205d18f0b pixman-0.26.2.tar.gz

1 0

File pixman-0.26.2.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by epienbro
by Erik van Pienbroek 21 Nov '12

21 Nov '12

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for mingw-pixman: 276242da5b3af1258d072cf205d18f0b pixman-0.26.2.tar.gz

1 0

[mingw-binutils/f18] (2 commits) ...Update to 2.23.51.0.5 release
by Erik van Pienbroek 21 Nov '12

21 Nov '12

Summary of changes: df2d6c8... Provides: bundled(libiberty) (*) f680200... Update to 2.23.51.0.5 release (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent

1 0

[mingw-binutils] Update to 2.23.51.0.5 release
by Erik van Pienbroek 21 Nov '12

21 Nov '12

commit f680200b942e6363197431998327aca20fa32aee Author: Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> Date: Wed Nov 21 20:59:12 2012 +0100 Update to 2.23.51.0.5 release .gitignore | 1 + mingw-binutils.spec | 7 +++++-- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index fb154ff..ef9d2bf 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -5,3 +5,4 @@ binutils-2.20.1.tar.bz2 /binutils-2.22.52.tar.bz2 /binutils-2.22.52.0.3.tar.bz2 /binutils-2.22.52.0.4.tar.bz2 +/binutils-2.23.51.0.5.tar.bz2 diff --git a/mingw-binutils.spec b/mingw-binutils.spec index f156f78..4dac145 100644 --- a/mingw-binutils.spec +++ b/mingw-binutils.spec @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ %global run_testsuite 1 Name: mingw-binutils -Version: 2.22.52.0.4 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 2.23.51.0.5 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: Cross-compiled version of binutils for Win32 and Win64 environments License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ @@ -246,6 +246,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/multilib %changelog +* Wed Nov 21 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.23.51.0.5-1 +- Update to 2.23.51.0.5 release + * Mon Oct 15 2012 Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> - 2.22.52.0.4-2 - Provides: bundled(libiberty) diff --git a/sources b/sources index b78cc80..c6c1ab0 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1 @@ -2a5beea06d6f3e21107365b91184e11c binutils-2.22.52.0.4.tar.bz2 +a08000d6c18b4667095e416816550a33 binutils-2.23.51.0.5.tar.bz2

1 0

File binutils-2.23.51.0.5.tar.bz2 uploaded to lookaside cache by epienbro
by Erik van Pienbroek 21 Nov '12

21 Nov '12

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for mingw-binutils: a08000d6c18b4667095e416816550a33 binutils-2.23.51.0.5.tar.bz2

1 0

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Nov '12

21 Nov '12

Product: Security Response https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849693 Bug 849693 depends on bug 877018, which changed state. Bug 877018 Summary: CVE-2012-3509 mutrace: in bundled libiberty [fedora-rawhide] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877018 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

using mingw64 from Fedora 17/18 on RHEL6
by Daniel Villeneuve 21 Nov '12

21 Nov '12

Hi, I'm looking for a way to install and test a cross-compilation toolchain from RHEL6 to 64-bit Windows. RH Support pointed me to some EPEL mingw64 RPMs, but the packages are not up-to-date and I've been told to use Fedora 17 or 18 packages instead. I've tried to find a "fedora.repo" file I could install in /etc/yum.repos.d on my RHEL6 machine in order to download the mingw64 packages, but could not find it. What would be the best way to get mingw64 to work on RHEL6? Is there such a fedora.repo file that I could download and use from RHEL6? Will there be dependency problems with the Fedora 17/18 RPMs for mingw64 on RHEL6? Should I get source mingw64 RPMs and build them myself on RHEL6? If so, which source RPMs should I use? I've been told that mingw64 is planned for RHEL7, but I'd really start using it on RHEL6 within a short delay. Any advice would be appreciated. Regards, -- Daniel Villeneuve

1 0

[Bug 830388] Review Request: mingw-libarchive - MinGW package for libarchive
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Nov '12

21 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830388 --- Comment #6 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> --- (In reply to comment #5) > The sub-package summaries still don't mention MinGW These issues aren't blockers. You're free to set +review and mention they can be fixed in the initial commit. Thanks. http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-libarchive.spec http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-libarchive-3.0.4-3.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 851677] Review Request: mingw-dbus-glib - D-Bus Message Bus System
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Nov '12

20 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851677 --- Comment #1 from greg.hellings(a)gmail.com --- I have updated the spec file to build a cleaner version of the library according to the package guidelines. Spec file is still in the same place. SRPM is now http://dl.thehellings.com/mingw32/dbus-glib/mingw-dbus-glib-0.100-2.fc17.sr… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 851689] Review Request: mingw-libgsf - Library for reading and writing structured files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Nov '12

20 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851689 --- Comment #1 from greg.hellings(a)gmail.com --- I've updated the spec file with knowledge garnered from my other review and also updated to the newest upstream release (1.14.25). Spec URL remains the same, SRPM is now http://dl.thehellings.com/mingw32/libgsf/mingw-libgsf-1.14.25-1.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 851180] Review Request: mingw-lcms - MinGW Color Management System
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Nov '12

20 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851180 --- Comment #6 from greg.hellings(a)gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #4) > Both versions are not fully API compatible. See for example > http://littlecms2.blogspot.ch/search?updated-max=2010-02-15T17:31:00Z&max- > results=12&start=12&by-date=false > > This is presumably why we have both versions as native libraries as well. > > I was packaging poppler for mingw, and poppler still wants lcms v1. > Understandable. I feel the same crunch for some software I've been trying to build. > > -rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build > > produces. The output should be posted in the review. > > mingw32-lcms-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources > > mingw64-lcms-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources > > In my opinion these should be waved. mingw debuginfo packages never include > the source code (see for example > mingw32-libtiff-debuginfo-3.9.5-7.fc17.noarch.rpm); also, the way this > package generates the debuginfo subpackage is exactly as per the fesco > approved mingw packaging guidelines > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW?rd=Packaging/ > MinGW#Manpages_and_info_files > > > mingw32-lcms-static.noarch: W: no-documentation > > mingw64-lcms-static.noarch: W: no-documentation > > Again, these should IMO be waved, as the mingw packaging guidelines requires > documentation which is just a duplicate of the documentation of the native > package not to be packaged. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW?rd=Packaging/ > MinGW#Manpages_and_info_files > Mea culpa. I should have marked that line as fine. Those warnings are acceptable. > > 4) Lines beginning with 'Group:' are superfluous and can be removed > I can do this if you really absolutely require this, but I find it ugly when > rpm -qi reports "Group: Unspecified"; also, other mingw packages also > provide a group name It's not a requirement, as Kalev mentioned > > 6) Is there a reason you are relying on mingw*-filesystem >= 68 instead of a > > newer version? > removed; I think this is a cut&paste artifact This needs to be minimally versioned to >= 95. You can set it higher if there are necessary dependencies introduced in later versions, e.g. macros you use in your spec file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 830388] Review Request: mingw-libarchive - MinGW package for libarchive
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Nov '12

20 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830388 --- Comment #5 from greg.hellings(a)gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #4) > > 2) Determine whether the secondary packages need a %doc line > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging: > LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing Ah, there it is. Thanks! The sub-package summaries still don't mention MinGW, but everything else looks fine. The new rpmlint run looks clean, and ready to ship. mingw32-bsdcpio.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C bsdcpio utility mingw32-bsdcpio.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libarchive -> lib archive, lib-archive, archive mingw32-bsdcpio.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-bsdtar.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C bsdtar utility mingw32-bsdtar.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libarchive -> lib archive, lib-archive, archive mingw32-bsdtar.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-libarchive.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpio -> CPI mingw32-libarchive.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ar -> AR, Ar, at mingw32-libarchive.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shar -> share, shear, shard mingw32-libarchive-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw32-libarchive-static.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-bsdcpio.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C bsdcpio utility mingw64-bsdcpio.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libarchive -> lib archive, lib-archive, archive mingw64-bsdcpio.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-bsdtar.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C bsdtar utility mingw64-bsdtar.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libarchive -> lib archive, lib-archive, archive mingw64-bsdtar.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-libarchive.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpio -> CPI mingw64-libarchive.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ar -> AR, Ar, at mingw64-libarchive.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shar -> share, shear, shard mingw64-libarchive-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw64-libarchive-static.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw-libarchive.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpio -> CPI mingw-libarchive.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ar -> AR, Ar, at mingw-libarchive.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shar -> share, shear, shard -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 851180] Review Request: mingw-lcms - MinGW Color Management System
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Nov '12

20 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851180 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kalevlember(a)gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to comment #4) > > 4) Lines beginning with 'Group:' are superfluous and can be removed > I can do this if you really absolutely require this, but I find it ugly when > rpm -qi reports "Group: Unspecified"; also, other mingw packages also > provide a group name The packaging guidelines say that it's only needed for EPEL compatibility: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Group_tag There's been some talk about doing a small revision of the MinGW packaging guidelines and, among other things, get rid of the group tag in the example spec file. So far it's just a draft though. I don't think it's overly important to drop this tag, definitely not a review blocker. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 851180] Review Request: mingw-lcms - MinGW Color Management System
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Nov '12

20 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851180 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer <t.sailer(a)alumni.ethz.ch> --- Thanks, Greg, for your review! (In reply to comment #2) > I'm further curious, if there is a version 2+ out, why are you packaging > this version, which is running on 3 years old now? Why is mingw-lcms2 not > sufficient? Both versions are not fully API compatible. See for example http://littlecms2.blogspot.ch/search?updated-max=2010-02-15T17:31:00Z&max-r… This is presumably why we have both versions as native libraries as well. I was packaging poppler for mingw, and poppler still wants lcms v1. (In reply to comment #3) > -rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build > produces. The output should be posted in the review. > mingw32-lcms-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources > mingw64-lcms-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources In my opinion these should be waved. mingw debuginfo packages never include the source code (see for example mingw32-libtiff-debuginfo-3.9.5-7.fc17.noarch.rpm); also, the way this package generates the debuginfo subpackage is exactly as per the fesco approved mingw packaging guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW?rd=Packaging/MinGW#Manpages_… > mingw32-lcms-static.noarch: W: no-documentation > mingw64-lcms-static.noarch: W: no-documentation Again, these should IMO be waved, as the mingw packaging guidelines requires documentation which is just a duplicate of the documentation of the native package not to be packaged. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW?rd=Packaging/MinGW#Manpages_… > Additional notes: > 1) Remove the 'rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}' as that is no longer necessary. done > 2) Remove the %clean section as that is no longer necessary. done > 3) The %defattr lines can be removed as well, they're now unnecessary. done > 4) Lines beginning with 'Group:' are superfluous and can be removed I can do this if you really absolutely require this, but I find it ugly when rpm -qi reports "Group: Unspecified"; also, other mingw packages also provide a group name > 5) The 'BuildRoot:' line should be removed done > 6) Is there a reason you are relying on mingw*-filesystem >= 68 instead of a > newer version? removed; I think this is a cut&paste artifact > 7) The two lines that define the globals mingw_build_win{32,64} can be > safely deleted. done -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 830388] Review Request: mingw-libarchive - MinGW package for libarchive
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Nov '12

20 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830388 --- Comment #4 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> --- (In reply to comment #3) > So it looks like just a few things: > 1) Add "MinGW build.." to the summaries Fixed. > 2) Determine whether the secondary packages need a %doc line http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Lice… > 3) Fix the upstream source URL. Fixed. > Lines that begin with 'Group:' are superflous, as Fedora makes no use of > them. They can be deleted from your spec file. Removed. > There are also a few other files that might be potential %doc files that > you're not including. For instance, you expressly convert NEWS from Latin1 > to UTF-8, but then you don't include it in the %doc line. Why is that? > README is also a potential for inclusion, I would suppose. Copy-pasta from the native spec. I've removed NEWS, but added README. We don't include most documentation that can be found in the native package. > This is my first official review as a packager, so bear with me. Kalev is my > mentor, so we can inquire of him regarding anything uncertain. Thanks. http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-libarchive.spec http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-libarchive-3.0.4-2.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 851180] Review Request: mingw-lcms - MinGW Color Management System
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Nov '12

20 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851180 --- Comment #3 from greg.hellings(a)gmail.com --- I can now do official reviews. Pasted below is my official review for this package. My question about why you're packaging this older version when the newer one is out still stands. Why maintain both packages in Fedora? Is this legacy release still in support? Either way, onto the review... Items marked + are good, and those marked - have issues. -rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build produces. The output should be posted in the review. mingw32-lcms-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw32-lcms-static.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-lcms-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw64-lcms-static.noarch: W: no-documentation +The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . +The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. +The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . +The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . +The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. +If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. +The spec file must be written in American English. +The spec file for the package MUST be legible. +The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. +The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. (I tested x86_64 on f17) +If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. +All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. +The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. (n/a)Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. +Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. (n/a) If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. +A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. +A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific situations) +Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. +Each package must consistently use macros. +The package must contain code, or permissable content. +Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). +If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. +Static libraries must be in a -static package. (n/a) Development files must be in a -devel package. (n/a) In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} +Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. +Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. +Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. +All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Additional notes: 1) Remove the 'rm -rf ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}' as that is no longer necessary. 2) Remove the %clean section as that is no longer necessary. 3) The %defattr lines can be removed as well, they're now unnecessary. 4) Lines beginning with 'Group:' are superfluous and can be removed 5) The 'BuildRoot:' line should be removed 6) Is there a reason you are relying on mingw*-filesystem >= 68 instead of a newer version? 7) The two lines that define the globals mingw_build_win{32,64} can be safely deleted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 830388] Review Request: mingw-libarchive - MinGW package for libarchive
by Red Hat Bugzilla 20 Nov '12

20 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830388 greg.hellings(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |greg.hellings(a)gmail.com --- Comment #3 from greg.hellings(a)gmail.com --- Now that I'm allowed to do these officially. Items marked + are good, and those marked - have issues. +rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build produces. The output should be posted in the review. mingw32-bsdcpio.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C bsdcpio utility mingw32-bsdcpio.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libarchive -> lib archive, lib-archive, archive mingw32-bsdcpio.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-bsdtar.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C bsdtar utility mingw32-bsdtar.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libarchive -> lib archive, lib-archive, archive mingw32-bsdtar.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-libarchive.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpio -> CPI mingw32-libarchive.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ar -> AR, Ar, at mingw32-libarchive.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shar -> share, shear, shard mingw32-libarchive-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw32-libarchive-static.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-bsdcpio.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C bsdcpio utility mingw64-bsdcpio.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libarchive -> lib archive, lib-archive, archive mingw64-bsdcpio.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-bsdtar.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized C bsdtar utility mingw64-bsdtar.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libarchive -> lib archive, lib-archive, archive mingw64-bsdtar.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-libarchive.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpio -> CPI mingw64-libarchive.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ar -> AR, Ar, at mingw64-libarchive.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shar -> share, shear, shard mingw64-libarchive-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw64-libarchive-static.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw-libarchive.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US cpio -> CPI mingw-libarchive.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ar -> AR, Ar, at mingw-libarchive.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shar -> share, shear, shard mingw-libarchive.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://libarchive.googlecode.com/files/libarchive-3.0.4.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found It's been suggested to me that summaries for mingw packages begin with the string "MinGW build of...". That will conform better with other MinGW packages and eliminate lots of those warnings. I don't know if the %doc line is necessary for every package or not - but having it there would quiet those warnings as well. +The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . +The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. +The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . +The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . +The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. -If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. !! This is included in each of the base library builds, but not in the binary builds. I'm not sure if that's an issue or not. +The spec file must be written in American English. +The spec file for the package MUST be legible. -The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. !! The URL has changed to distribute off of github.com. The address should now reflect https://github.com/downloads/libarchive/libarchive/libarchive-3.0.4.tar.gz The hashes map between the one you provided and the upstream I linked. +The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. (I tested x86_64 on f17) +If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. +All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. +The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. (n/a)Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. +Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. (n/a) If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. +A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. +A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific situations) +Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. +Each package must consistently use macros. +The package must contain code, or permissable content. +Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). +If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. +Static libraries must be in a -static package. (n/a) Development files must be in a -devel package. (n/a) In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} +Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. +Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. +Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. +All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. So it looks like just a few things: 1) Add "MinGW build.." to the summaries 2) Determine whether the secondary packages need a %doc line 3) Fix the upstream source URL. Lines that begin with 'Group:' are superflous, as Fedora makes no use of them. They can be deleted from your spec file. There are also a few other files that might be potential %doc files that you're not including. For instance, you expressly convert NEWS from Latin1 to UTF-8, but then you don't include it in the %doc line. Why is that? README is also a potential for inclusion, I would suppose. This is my first official review as a packager, so bear with me. Kalev is my mentor, so we can inquire of him regarding anything uncertain. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 851677] Review Request: mingw-dbus-glib - D-Bus Message Bus System
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Nov '12

19 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851677 greg.hellings(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 851680] Review Request: mingw-libidl - MinGW Windows IDL Parsing Library.
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Nov '12

19 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851680 greg.hellings(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 851689] Review Request: mingw-libgsf - Library for reading and writing structured files
by Red Hat Bugzilla 19 Nov '12

19 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=851689 greg.hellings(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Nov '12

18 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-5.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Nov '12

18 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

Broken dependencies: mingw32-libpng
by Fedora Koji Build System 18 Nov '12

18 Nov '12

mingw32-libpng has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(zlib1.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-filesystem >= 0:63 mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-runtime Please resolve this as soon as possible.

1 0

Broken dependencies: mingw32-libpng
by Fedora Koji Build System 18 Nov '12

18 Nov '12

mingw32-libpng has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(zlib1.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-filesystem >= 0:63 mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-runtime Please resolve this as soon as possible.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Nov '12

18 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-5.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-5.fc18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Nov '12

18 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> --- mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-5.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-5.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Nov '12

18 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Nov '12

16 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 --- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Nov '12

16 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 greg.hellings(a)gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from greg.hellings(a)gmail.com --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw-clucene Short Description: MinGW build of a C++ port of Lucene Owners: greghellings Branches: f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Nov '12

16 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 --- Comment #20 from greg.hellings(a)gmail.com --- I've put up a new -5 srpm as above along with an updated .spec file that uses %{summary} in the binary packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Nov '12

16 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #19 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> --- I've sponsored you as well, please use your new powers wisely! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Nov '12

16 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> --- Looks good. I see you've changed the summary for the source package, please edit the summary of the review ticket as well, so that they match (releng git repo creation tools check this). APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Nov '12

16 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 --- Comment #17 from greg.hellings(a)gmail.com --- I have addressed all of the above, I believe. The patch did not originate with me, so I don't want to be responsible for submitting it upstream. The rest of the problems which can be addressed have been. New SRPM: http://dl.thehellings.com/mingw32/clucene/mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-4.fc17.src.… Spec still at: http://dl.thehellings.com/mingw32/clucene/mingw-clucene.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Nov '12

16 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 --- Comment #16 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> --- Fedora review of mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-3.fc17.src.rpm 2012-11-16 + OK ! needs attention rpmlint output: $ rpmlint mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-3.fc18.src.rpm \ mingw32-clucene \ mingw64-clucene \ mingw32-clucene-debuginfo-2.3.3.4-3.fc18.noarch.rpm \ mingw64-clucene-debuginfo-2.3.3.4-3.fc18.noarch.rpm mingw32-clucene.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C date with Lucene 2.3.2. It contains most of the same functionality as the Java version. mingw32-clucene.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mingw32-clucene-2.3.3.4/LGPL.license mingw64-clucene.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C date with Lucene 2.3.2. It contains most of the same functionality as the Java version. mingw64-clucene.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mingw64-clucene-2.3.3.4/LGPL.license mingw-clucene.src: E: description-line-too-long C date with Lucene 2.3.2. It contains most of the same functionality as the Java version. mingw-clucene.src:70: W: setup-not-quiet mingw-clucene.src:15: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 15, tab: line 5) mingw32-clucene-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw64-clucene-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 2 warnings. Can you try to address these warnings where it makes sense, to cut down the noise a bit? One warning that is likely to remain is the debuginfo-without-sources: this is just a common warning with all mingw debuginfo packages, nothing wrong with this particular package. The other one you shouldn't directly fix is the incorrect-fsf-address: we aren't supposed to patch license files in downstream packages; instead, if you want to, you can file a ticket with upstream asking if they can update the LGPL.license file in the next release. + The package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + The spec file name matches the base package name. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The license field in the spec file matches the actual license + The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding native Fedora package + The package contains the license files (APACHE.license, COPYING, LGPL.license) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum: 48d647fbd8ef8889e5a7f422c1bfda94 clucene-core-2.3.3.4.tar.gz 48d647fbd8ef8889e5a7f422c1bfda94 Download/clucene-core-2.3.3.4.tar.gz + The package builds in koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane n/a locale handling n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun ! Package bundles copies of system libraries I can see copies of boost and zlib in the tarball, under src/ext/. Can you remove these in %prep to make sure the package doesn't use the bundled copies? n/a Package isn't relocatable + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + Permissions are properly set + Consistent use of macros + The package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Not applicable to MinGW packages. n/a Static libraries should be in -static n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages must not contain libtool .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Directory ownership sane + Filenames are valid UTF-8 Some minor nitpicks about the spec file: > Summary: A C++ port of Lucene Most of the mingw packages in Fedora mention mingw in their summary, often starting it with "Summary: MinGW ...". Might be nice to follow this convention here as well. > Group: Development/System The package management tools in Fedora don't make any use of the Group tag, so if you want to, all 3 Group tags here can be removed. > Patch52: mingw-clucene-core-2.3.3.4-fix-threads.patch Can you submit this upstream? > Provides: mingw32-clucene = %{version}-%{release} [...] > Provides: mingw64-clucene = %{version}-%{release} Please remove the these provides, they are now the same as the binary package names. > %setup -n %{_pkg_name}-core-%{version} Should be "%setup -qn ...", like rpmlint noted above. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Nov '12

16 Nov '12

Product: Fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 --- Comment #15 from greg.hellings(a)gmail.com --- I've renamed the packages and removed the boost and pthreads dependencies. The library now builds a multi-threaded version. Spec is at the same URL as above. SRPM is at http://dl.thehellings.com/mingw32/clucene/mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-3.fc17.src.… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Nov '12

16 Nov '12

Product: Security Response https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849693 --- Comment #34 from Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov(a)redhat.com> --- Statement: The versions of the gdb package, as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and 6 are vulnerable to the original libiberty integer overflow flaw. But due the way of subsequent processing of the previously insufficiently pre-allocated libiberty buffer within gdb code, the impact of this issue is limited to crash only. Red Hat Security Response Team does not consider crash of end-user application, such as gdb, to be a security flaw. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Nov '12

16 Nov '12

Product: Security Response https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849693 Bug 849693 depends on bug 860769, which changed state. Bug 860769 Summary: CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860769 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Nov '12

16 Nov '12

1 0

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Nov '12

16 Nov '12

Product: Security Response https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849693 --- Comment #33 from Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to comment #31) Hi Jan, > Jan, > is this bug therefore an "arbitrary code execution" exploitable or not? Depends on the way how you are asking: -------------------------------------- 1) If you are asking generally if CVE-2012-3509 flaw can be used for arbitrary code execution (an adversary to reach code execution under the privileges of the victim, when the victim inspects provided file remotely), then the reply would be yes. The CVE-2012-3509 flaw is believed to be able to cause arbitrary code execution. To actually reach this it would not be a trivial task though. 2) If you are asking if gdb packages (since embedding libiberty code) are prone to arbitrary code execution, then the reply would be no. The actual exploitation depends on the 'code around' processing result of bfd_alloc2() / _objalloc_alloc and from what I can tell so far for gdb case, the resulting buffer is under-allocated, but the subsequent routine is just zero-ying its content at: #2 setup_group (newsect=0x29a9bf0, hdr=0x29b2690, abfd=0x297a960) at ../../bfd/elf.c:607 routine, so explicitly for gdb this could not allow arbitrary code execution. > > IMO it is not, therefore it is a normal uninteresting crasher bug which has > been fixed upstream now and which is IMO not even worth a backport. There > are many such uninteresting invalid-input crasher bugs in GNU toolchain (see > Comment 2). See above. If we are talking about gdb case here, then yes, I agree. But for the rest of possibly affected packages the potential impact still needs to be investigated (to either confirm the danger or disprove it like in gdb case). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Nov '12

16 Nov '12

Product: Security Response https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849693 Jan Lieskovsky <jlieskov(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(jlieskov(a)redhat.c | |om) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Nov '12

16 Nov '12

Product: Security Response https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849693 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(jlieskov(a)redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #31 from Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com> --- Jan, is this bug therefore an "arbitrary code execution" exploitable or not? IMO it is not, therefore it is a normal uninteresting crasher bug which has been fixed upstream now and which is IMO not even worth a backport. There are many such uninteresting invalid-input crasher bugs in GNU toolchain (see Comment 2). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary
by Red Hat Bugzilla 16 Nov '12

16 Nov '12

Product: Security Response https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849693 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment #2 is|1 |0 private| | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Nov '12

15 Nov '12

Product: Security Response https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849693 --- Comment #30 from Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil(a)redhat.com> --- (In reply to comment #29) > The following packages actually export the _objalloc_alloc symbol This is incomplete as _objalloc_alloc does not have to be exported but it still can be used inside the binary. Package 'gdb' exports its very every symbol but this is a current bug to be fixed. It is caused due to its linkage with Python: -Xlinker -export-dynamic avr-gdb does not link with Python so it does not wasterfully export everything. Therefore to very avr-gdb one has to verify _objalloc_alloc presence by: # yum install avr-gdb-debuginfo $ nm /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin/avr-gdb.debug | grep -w _objalloc_alloc 00000000005d85c0 T _objalloc_alloc So avr-gdb and probably some other packages should be also listed as affected. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Nov '12

15 Nov '12

Product: Security Response https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849693 Bug 849693 depends on bug 877013, which changed state. Bug 877013 Summary: CVE-2012-3509 in bundled libiberty https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877013 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Nov '12

15 Nov '12

Product: Security Response https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849693 Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |877018 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Nov '12

15 Nov '12

Product: Security Response https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849693 Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |877017 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Nov '12

15 Nov '12

Product: Security Response https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849693 Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |877014 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Nov '12

15 Nov '12

Product: Security Response https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849693 Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |877013 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 849693] CVE-2012-3509 libiberty: integer overflow, leading to heap-buffer overflow by processing certain file headers via bfd binary
by Red Hat Bugzilla 15 Nov '12

15 Nov '12

Product: Security Response https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=849693 Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends On| |877012 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Nov '12

13 Nov '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 --- Comment #14 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> --- We normally don't do -devel / library package splits in the MinGW packages; everything is shipped in a single package. So instead of one -devel package and two library package like the native build has, the MinGW build would just ship everything in a single package. The rationale for this is that these packages are only useful for developers and for development purposes, and as such it doesn't make sense to split them up, if everyone is going to install all the subpackages anyway. > I can modify the naming scheme if you want, but I had just copied the > scheme used by the native packages. Oh this should be your choice, you are the Clucene expert. I don't know enough of the project to make the decision. Just pointing out a possible mistake in the packaging that is difficult to correct afterwards (source package renaming needs a re-review). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Nov '12

13 Nov '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 --- Comment #13 from greg.hellings(a)gmail.com --- The current naming scheme mimics the one by the native package: upstream tarball: clucene-core source package: clucene binary packages: clucene-core / clucene-core-devel / clucene-contribs-lib The contribs are part of the clucene-core source tarball. I'm not building them, presently, but nothing prevents me from doing so in the future. I can modify the naming scheme if you want, but I had just copied the scheme used by the native packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

Mass rebuild report for November 13 2012
by Erik van Pienbroek 13 Nov '12

13 Nov '12

This is a report for the 20121113 mass rebuild of all Fedora MinGW packages against Fedora Rawhide and a list of all the changes which have been applied since the previous mass rebuild. During this mass rebuild the following toolchain was used: * mingw-w64 20121110 trunk snapshot * binutils 2.22.52.0.4 * gcc 4.7.2 Statistics about current mass rebuild: -------------------------------------- Timestamp of mass rebuild: 20121113 Total packages: 150 Number of failed packages: 1 Number of succeeded packages: 149 Number of added packages since previous mass rebuild: 0 Time needed to perform mass rebuild: 30 hours, 19 minutes, 3 seconds Statistics about previous mass rebuild: --------------------------------------- Timestamp of previous mass rebuild: 20121106 Total packages: 150 Number of failed packages: 3 Number of succeeded packages: 147 =============================================================================== The following packages were updated since the previous rebuild: mingw-crt-2.0.999-0.15.trunk.20121110.fc19 ------------------------------------------- * Sat Nov 10 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.0.999-0.15.trunk.20121110 - Update to 20121110 snapshot * Fri Nov 09 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.0.999-0.14.trunk.20121109 - Update to 20121109 snapshot mingw-filesystem-96-2.fc19 --------------------------- * Sat Nov 10 2012 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> - 96-2 - Add provides for mscoree.dll and regenerate the standard-dlls file mingw-glib2-2.35.1-1.fc19 -------------------------- * Fri Nov 09 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.35.1-1 - Update to 2.35.1 mingw-gnutls-2.12.21-1.fc19 ---------------------------- * Sat Nov 10 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.12.21-1 - Update to 2.12.21 mingw-gtk3-3.7.0-1.fc19 ------------------------ * Fri Nov 09 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 3.7.0-1 - Update to 3.7.0 mingw-headers-2.0.999-0.15.trunk.20121110.fc19 ----------------------------------------------- * Sat Nov 10 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.0.999-0.15.trunk.20121110 - Update to 20121110 snapshot - Fixes build issue with DirectWrite support in mingw-qt5-qtbase * Fri Nov 09 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.0.999-0.14.trunk.20121109 - Update to 20121109 snapshot mingw-libtasn1-2.14-1.fc19 --------------------------- * Sat Nov 10 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.14-1 - Update to 2.14 mingw-openssl-1.0.1c-1.fc19 ---------------------------- * Fri Nov 09 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 1.0.1c-1 - Update to 1.0.1c - Synced patches with native openssl-1.0.1c-7.fc19 mingw-qt-4.8.3-3.fc19 ---------------------- * Sun Nov 04 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 4.8.3-3 - Don't automatically strip debugging symbols from binaries created using qmake as we've got RPM wrapper strips to automatically split off debugging symbols to a separate debuginfo subpackage - Make sure linking against the static QtUiTools library works out-of-the-box mingw-qt5-qt3d-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.e4d3ccac.fc19 --------------------------------------------------------- * Sun Nov 11 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.e4d3ccac - Update to 20121111 snapshot (rev e4d3ccac) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase - Dropped pkg-config rename hack as it's unneeded now mingw-qt5-qtactiveqt-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.435fac3b.fc19 --------------------------------------------------------------- * Sun Nov 11 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.435fac3b - Update to 20121111 snapshot (rev 4cbcad7f) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase mingw-qt5-qtbase-5.0.0-0.13.beta1.git20121110.d725239c.fc19 ------------------------------------------------------------ * Sat Nov 10 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.13.beta1.git20121110.d725239c - Update to 20121110 snapshot (rev d725239c) - Dropped the configure argument -qtlibinfix 5 as upstream has resolved the file conflicts with Qt4 properly now - Added several missing flags to the mkspecs profiles - Dropped the pkg-config file renames as they're not needed any more - Dropped two obsolete patches * Sat Nov 10 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.12.beta1.git20121103.ccc4fbdf - Update to 20121103 snapshot (rev ccc4fbdf) - Use -std=c++11 instead of -std=c++0x as the latter is deprecated in gcc 4.7 - Added DirectWrite support - Added Angle support mingw-qt5-qtconnectivity-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.63139e83.fc19 ------------------------------------------------------------------- * Mon Nov 12 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.63139e83 - Update to 20121112 snapshot (rev 63139e83) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase - Dropped pkg-config rename hack as it's unneeded now mingw-qt5-qtdeclarative-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.dd1d6b56.fc19 ------------------------------------------------------------------ * Sun Nov 11 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.dd1d6b56 - Update to 20121111 snapshot (rev dd1d6b56) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase - Dropped pkg-config rename hack as it's unneeded now - Dropped upstreamed patch mingw-qt5-qtdoc-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.0530cf09.fc19 ---------------------------------------------------------- * Mon Nov 12 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.0530cf09 - Update to 20121112 snapshot (rev 0530cf09) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase mingw-qt5-qtfeedback-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.d22ba2dd.fc19 --------------------------------------------------------------- * Mon Nov 12 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.d22ba2dd - Update to 20121112 snapshot (rev d22ba2dd) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase - Dropped pkg-config rename hack as it's unneeded now mingw-qt5-qtimageformats-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.a0ec617b.fc19 ------------------------------------------------------------------- * Mon Nov 12 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.a0ec617b - Update to 20121112 snapshot (rev a0ec617b) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase - Dropped pkg-config rename hack as it's unneeded now - Dropped upstreamed patch mingw-qt5-qtjsbackend-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.4cbcad7f.fc19 ---------------------------------------------------------------- * Sun Nov 11 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.4cbcad7f - Update to 20121111 snapshot (rev 4cbcad7f) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase - Dropped pkg-config rename hack as it's unneeded now - Added BR: python mingw-qt5-qtlocation-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.8e6b5b08.fc19 --------------------------------------------------------------- * Mon Nov 12 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.8e6b5b08 - Update to 20121112 snapshot (rev 8e6b5b08) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase - Dropped pkg-config rename hack as it's unneeded now mingw-qt5-qtmultimedia-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.a73dfa7c.fc19 ----------------------------------------------------------------- * Mon Nov 12 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.a73dfa7c - Update to 20121112 snapshot (rev a73dfa7c) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase - Dropped pkg-config rename hack as it's unneeded now mingw-qt5-qtpim-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.2c24dab3.fc19 ---------------------------------------------------------- * Mon Nov 12 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.2c24dab3 - Update to 20121112 snapshot (rev 2c24dab3) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase - Dropped pkg-config rename hack as it's unneeded now mingw-qt5-qtquick1-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.a14ab84c.fc19 ------------------------------------------------------------- * Sun Nov 11 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.a14ab84c - Update to 20121111 snapshot (rev a14ab84c) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase - Dropped pkg-config rename hack as it's unneeded now mingw-qt5-qtscript-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.d1427402.fc19 ------------------------------------------------------------- * Sun Nov 11 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.d1427402 - Update to 20121111 snapshot (rev d1427402) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase - Dropped pkg-config rename hack as it's unneeded now - Dropped upstream patch mingw-qt5-qtsensors-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.ac76c8d5.fc19 -------------------------------------------------------------- * Mon Nov 12 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.ac76c8d5 - Update to 20121112 snapshot (rev ac76c8d5) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase - Dropped pkg-config rename hack as it's unneeded now mingw-qt5-qtsvg-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.45483bfa.fc19 ---------------------------------------------------------- * Mon Nov 12 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.45483bfa - Update to 20121112 snapshot (rev 45483bfa) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase - Dropped pkg-config rename hack as it's unneeded now mingw-qt5-qtsystems-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.511d739c.fc19 -------------------------------------------------------------- * Mon Nov 12 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.511d739c - Update to 20121112 snapshot (rev 511d739c) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase - Dropped pkg-config rename hack as it's unneeded now mingw-qt5-qttools-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.769fa282.fc19 ------------------------------------------------------------ * Mon Nov 12 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.769fa282 - Update to 20121112 snapshot (rev 769fa282) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase - Dropped pkg-config rename hack as it's unneeded now - Dropped upstreamed patch mingw-qt5-qttranslations-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.ad9181a5.fc19 ------------------------------------------------------------------- * Mon Nov 12 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.ad9181a5 - Update to 20121112 snapshot (rev ad9181a5) mingw-qt5-qtwebkit-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.23037105.fc19 ------------------------------------------------------------- * Mon Nov 12 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.23037105 - Update to 20121112 snapshot (rev 23037105) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase - Dropped pkg-config rename hack as it's unneeded now - Dropped upstreamed patch - Added BR: python - Added BR: ruby mingw-qt5-qtxmlpatterns-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.69b7a0bb.fc19 ------------------------------------------------------------------ * Mon Nov 12 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.69b7a0bb - Update to 20121112 snapshot (rev 69b7a0bb) - Rebuild against latest mingw-qt5-qtbase - Dropped pkg-config rename hack as it's unneeded now =============================================================================== The following packages FAILED to rebuild: mingw-spice-gtk-0.12-3 !! Package failed to build while it succeeded during the previous mass rebuild !! Package owner: elmarco Time to build: 3 minutes, 51 seconds Build logs: http://build1.openftd.org/fedora-mingw-rebuild/20121113/mingw-spice-gtk-0.1… =============================================================================== The following packages were rebuilt successfully: mingw-antlr-2.7.7-10 Time to build: 1 minute, 52 seconds mingw-atk-2.6.0-1 Time to build: 1 minute, 49 seconds mingw-atkmm-2.22.6-5 Time to build: 2 minutes, 24 seconds mingw-binutils-2.22.52.0.4-2 Time to build: 7 minutes, 8 seconds mingw-boost-1.48.0-10 Time to build: 1 hour, 5 minutes, 57 seconds mingw-bzip2-1.0.6-2 Time to build: 1 minute, 16 seconds mingw-cairo-1.12.6-1 Time to build: 5 minutes, 19 seconds mingw-cairomm-1.10.0-8 Time to build: 1 minute, 55 seconds mingw-celt051-0.5.1.3-10 Time to build: 1 minute, 34 seconds mingw-cppunit-1.12.1-10 Time to build: 1 minute, 1 second mingw-crossreport-8-3 Time to build: 23 seconds mingw-crt-2.0.999-0.15.trunk.20121110 Time to build: 3 minutes, 45 seconds mingw-curl-7.25.0-2 Time to build: 7 minutes, 9 seconds mingw-cximage-600-7 Time to build: 3 minutes, 1 second mingw-cxxtest-3.10.1-10 Time to build: 18 seconds mingw-dbus-1.6.4-1 Time to build: 3 minutes, 54 seconds mingw-dirac-1.0.2-9 Time to build: 1 minute, 29 seconds mingw-dlfcn-0-0.14.r11 Time to build: 46 seconds mingw-enchant-1.6.0-7 Time to build: 1 minute, 46 seconds mingw-expat-2.1.0-3 Time to build: 1 minute, 4 seconds mingw-filesystem-96-2 Time to build: 16 seconds mingw-fontconfig-2.10.1-2 Time to build: 1 minute, 58 seconds mingw-freeglut-2.8.0-3 Time to build: 1 minute, 34 seconds mingw-freetype-2.4.10-2 Time to build: 1 minute, 33 seconds mingw-ftplib-3.1-6 Time to build: 38 seconds mingw-gcc-4.7.2-2 Time to build: 28 minutes, 11 seconds mingw-gdb-7.5-2 Time to build: 7 minutes, 30 seconds mingw-gdbm-1.8.0-10 Time to build: 54 seconds mingw-gdk-pixbuf-2.26.4-1 Time to build: 3 minutes, 51 seconds mingw-gettext-0.18.1.1-10 Time to build: 10 minutes, 28 seconds mingw-glib2-2.35.1-1 Time to build: 16 minutes, 41 seconds mingw-glibmm24-2.32.1-1 Time to build: 5 minutes, 11 seconds mingw-glib-networking-2.34.0-1 Time to build: 2 minutes, 38 seconds mingw-gmp-5.0.5-1 Time to build: 3 minutes, mingw-gnutls-2.12.21-1 !! Package built successfully while it failed during the previous mass rebuild !! Time to build: 9 minutes, 50 seconds mingw-goocanvas2-2.0.1-5 Time to build: 2 minutes, 47 seconds mingw-gsl-1.15-3 Time to build: 4 minutes, 25 seconds mingw-gstreamer-0.10.36-2 Time to build: 3 minutes, 49 seconds mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.23-6 Time to build: 7 minutes, 8 seconds mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.36-2 Time to build: 5 minutes, 37 seconds mingw-gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.31-7 Time to build: 6 minutes, 29 seconds mingw-gtk2-2.24.13-1 Time to build: 14 minutes, 36 seconds mingw-gtk3-3.7.0-1 Time to build: 13 minutes, 23 seconds mingw-gtkhtml3-4.4.0-2 Time to build: 6 minutes, 30 seconds mingw-gtkmm24-2.24.2-7 Time to build: 9 minutes, 22 seconds mingw-gtkmm30-3.4.0-2 Time to build: 9 minutes, 31 seconds mingw-gtksourceview3-3.4.1-2 Time to build: 3 minutes, 28 seconds mingw-gtk-vnc-0.5.1-2 Time to build: 4 minutes, 12 seconds mingw-harfbuzz-0.9.3-1 Time to build: 3 minutes, 5 seconds mingw-headers-2.0.999-0.15.trunk.20121110 Time to build: 1 minute, 22 seconds mingw-hunspell-1.3.2-7 Time to build: 1 minute, 59 seconds mingw-icu-4.8.1.1-6 Time to build: 6 minutes, 59 seconds mingw-jasper-1.900.1-20 Time to build: 1 minute, 45 seconds mingw-libffi-3.0.11-0.4.rc2 Time to build: 1 minute, 9 seconds mingw-libgcrypt-1.5.0-5 Time to build: 2 minutes, 50 seconds mingw-libgeotiff-1.3.0-0.7.svn1664 Time to build: 1 minute, 1 second mingw-libglade2-2.6.4-14 Time to build: 3 minutes, 34 seconds mingw-libglademm24-2.6.7-16 Time to build: 2 minutes, mingw-libgnurx-2.5.1-13 Time to build: 1 minute, 7 seconds mingw-libgpg-error-1.10-3 Time to build: 1 minute, 32 seconds mingw-libidn-1.25-1 Time to build: 2 minutes, 53 seconds mingw-libjpeg-turbo-1.2.1-2 Time to build: 2 minutes, 20 seconds mingw-libltdl-2.4-7 Time to build: 48 seconds mingw-libogg-1.3.0-3 Time to build: 1 minute, 15 seconds mingw-liboil-0.3.16-7 Time to build: 1 minute, 18 seconds mingw-libosinfo-0.2.0-1 Time to build: 2 minutes, 8 seconds mingw-libpng-1.5.13-1 Time to build: 1 minute, 32 seconds mingw-libsigc++20-2.2.10-8 Time to build: 1 minute, 23 seconds mingw-libsigsegv-2.6-6 Time to build: 47 seconds mingw-libsoup-2.40.1-1 Time to build: 5 minutes, 22 seconds mingw-libsqlite3x-20071018-17 Time to build: 1 minute, 33 seconds mingw-libssh2-1.1-12 Time to build: 2 minutes, mingw-libtasn1-2.14-1 Time to build: 1 minute, 37 seconds mingw-libtiff-4.0.2-1 Time to build: 3 minutes, 12 seconds mingw-libusbx-1.0.11-2 Time to build: 1 minute, 7 seconds mingw-libvirt-0.10.2-1 Time to build: 7 minutes, 40 seconds mingw-libvirt-glib-0.1.2-1 Time to build: 2 minutes, 34 seconds mingw-libvorbis-1.3.3-1 Time to build: 1 minute, 14 seconds mingw-libxml++-2.34.2-7 Time to build: 2 minutes, 3 seconds mingw-libxml2-2.9.0-1 Time to build: 5 minutes, 9 seconds mingw-libxslt-1.1.27-2 Time to build: 2 minutes, 7 seconds mingw-libzip-0.9-7 Time to build: 1 minute, 5 seconds mingw-llvm-3.0-5 Time to build: 22 minutes, 17 seconds mingw-matahari-0.5.0-1 Time to build: 2 minutes, 35 seconds mingw-nettle-2.4-2 Time to build: 1 minute, 56 seconds mingw-nsis-2.46-8 Time to build: 2 minutes, 24 seconds mingw-nsiswrapper-9-4 Time to build: 17 seconds mingw-openjpeg-1.3-10 Time to build: 49 seconds mingw-openssl-1.0.1c-1 !! Package built successfully while it failed during the previous mass rebuild !! Time to build: 10 minutes, 46 seconds mingw-orc-0.4.16-2 Time to build: 1 minute, 36 seconds mingw-p11-kit-0.13-1 Time to build: 2 minutes, 46 seconds mingw-pango-1.32.1-1 Time to build: 3 minutes, 14 seconds mingw-pangomm-2.28.4-4 Time to build: 5 minutes, 55 seconds mingw-pcre-8.30-2 Time to build: 1 minute, 59 seconds mingw-pdcurses-3.4-13 Time to build: 1 minute, 8 seconds mingw-pixman-0.24.4-4 Time to build: 1 minute, 55 seconds mingw-pkg-config-0.27-1 Time to build: 39 seconds mingw-plotmm-0.1.2-14 Time to build: 1 minute, 55 seconds mingw-portablexdr-4.9.1-9 Time to build: 1 minute, 6 seconds mingw-proj-4.6.1-9 Time to build: 57 seconds mingw-pthreads-2.8.0-22.20110511cvs Time to build: 1 minute, 21 seconds mingw-qpid-cpp-0.14-4 Time to build: 17 minutes, 45 seconds mingw-qt-4.8.3-3 Time to build: 8 hours, 10 minutes, 0 seconds mingw-qt5-qt3d-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.e4d3ccac Time to build: 11 minutes, 56 seconds mingw-qt5-qtactiveqt-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.435fac3b Time to build: 3 minutes, 30 seconds mingw-qt5-qtbase-5.0.0-0.13.beta1.git20121110.d725239c Time to build: 1 hour, 26 minutes, 34 seconds mingw-qt5-qtconnectivity-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.63139e83 Time to build: 2 minutes, 32 seconds mingw-qt5-qtdeclarative-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.dd1d6b56 Time to build: 22 minutes, 12 seconds mingw-qt5-qtdoc-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.0530cf09 Time to build: 2 minutes, 8 seconds mingw-qt5-qtfeedback-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.d22ba2dd Time to build: 2 minutes, 3 seconds mingw-qt5-qtgraphicaleffects-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.fcbc6043 Time to build: 1 minute, 51 seconds mingw-qt5-qtimageformats-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.a0ec617b Time to build: 2 minutes, 22 seconds mingw-qt5-qtjsbackend-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.4cbcad7f Time to build: 7 minutes, 52 seconds mingw-qt5-qtlocation-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.8e6b5b08 Time to build: 7 minutes, 40 seconds mingw-qt5-qtmultimedia-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.a73dfa7c Time to build: 7 minutes, 38 seconds mingw-qt5-qtpim-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.2c24dab3 Time to build: 6 minutes, 41 seconds mingw-qt5-qtquick1-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.a14ab84c Time to build: 12 minutes, 25 seconds mingw-qt5-qtscript-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121111.d1427402 Time to build: 10 minutes, 33 seconds mingw-qt5-qtsensors-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.ac76c8d5 Time to build: 3 minutes, 49 seconds mingw-qt5-qtsvg-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.45483bfa Time to build: 2 minutes, 27 seconds mingw-qt5-qtsystems-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.511d739c Time to build: 4 minutes, 16 seconds mingw-qt5-qttools-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.769fa282 Time to build: 25 minutes, 53 seconds mingw-qt5-qttranslations-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.ad9181a5 Time to build: 1 minute, 54 seconds mingw-qt5-qtwebkit-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.23037105 Time to build: 1 hour, 37 minutes, 25 seconds mingw-qt5-qtxmlpatterns-5.0.0-0.2.beta1.git20121112.69b7a0bb Time to build: 14 minutes, 44 seconds mingw-qwt-5.2.2-1 Time to build: 5 minutes, 43 seconds mingw-readline-5.2-13 Time to build: 1 minute, 35 seconds mingw-SDL-1.2.15-2 Time to build: 2 minutes, 1 second mingw-SDL_image-1.2.12-7 Time to build: 1 minute, 27 seconds mingw-SDL_mixer-1.2.12-2 Time to build: 1 minute, 17 seconds mingw-sigar-1.6.5-0.9.git58097d9 Time to build: 39 seconds mingw-spice-protocol-0.10.1-2 Time to build: 26 seconds mingw-sqlite-3.7.9-7 Time to build: 2 minutes, 25 seconds mingw-srvany-1.0-9 Time to build: 45 seconds mingw-tcl-8.5.11-6 Time to build: 3 minutes, 26 seconds mingw-termcap-1.3.1-14 Time to build: 50 seconds mingw-tk-8.5.9-7 Time to build: 1 minute, 48 seconds mingw-w64-tools-2.0.999-0.5.trunk.20120124 Time to build: 1 minute, 43 seconds mingw-webkitgtk-1.10.1-1 Time to build: 2 hours, 26 minutes, 34 seconds mingw-webkitgtk3-1.10.1-1 Time to build: 2 hours, 2 minutes, 35 seconds mingw-wine-gecko-1.8-1 !! Package built successfully while it failed during the previous mass rebuild !! Time to build: 1 hour, 33 minutes, 34 seconds mingw-win-iconv-0.0.4-1 Time to build: 1 minute, 18 seconds mingw-wpcap-4.1.final2-8 Time to build: 1 minute, 16 seconds mingw-wxWidgets-2.8.12-12 Time to build: 1 hour, 32 minutes, 51 seconds mingw-xerces-c-3.1.1-6 Time to build: 6 minutes, 9 seconds mingw-xz-5.1.2-2alpha Time to build: 1 minute, 40 seconds mingw-zfstream-20041202-15 Time to build: 1 minute, 25 seconds mingw-zlib-1.2.5-11 Time to build: 1 minute, 17 seconds wine-mono-0.0.8-1 Time to build: 35 minutes, 44 seconds =============================================================================== Mass rebuild script for the Fedora MinGW packages written and maintained by Erik van Pienbroek (epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org)

1 0

Broken dependencies: mingw32-libpng
by Fedora Koji Build System 11 Nov '12

11 Nov '12

mingw32-libpng has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(zlib1.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-filesystem >= 0:63 mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-runtime Please resolve this as soon as possible.

1 0

Broken dependencies: mingw32-libpng
by Fedora Koji Build System 11 Nov '12

11 Nov '12

mingw32-libpng has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(zlib1.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-filesystem >= 0:63 mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-runtime Please resolve this as soon as possible.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Nov '12

10 Nov '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |kalevlember(a)gmail.com Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |kalevlember(a)gmail.com --- Comment #12 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> --- Hi Greg, Like we talked on IRC, I'm now a sponsor and going to help you become an official packager. The spec file here looks very nice, but I have a question about the package naming, which is currently: upstream tarball: clucene-core source package: mingw-clucene binary packages: mingw32-clucene-core / mingw64-clucene-core Some of the things are called "clucene", and some "clucene-core". Wouldn't it make sense to stick with one name everywhere? I think it's a bit confusing to have different names for the source and binary packages; in the mingw packaging we've so far tried to keep them the same to keep the packaging simple and avoid confusion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[mingw-glib2] Fix the build (upstream commit 2b17e7)
by Erik van Pienbroek 09 Nov '12

09 Nov '12

commit c0d1bcbe7f7c31bfea2b01ed74f784776253f7d2 Author: Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> Date: Fri Nov 9 16:25:23 2012 +0100 Fix the build (upstream commit 2b17e7) glib-commit2b17e7.patch | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ mingw-glib2.spec | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/glib-commit2b17e7.patch b/glib-commit2b17e7.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7fa1433 --- /dev/null +++ b/glib-commit2b17e7.patch @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +From 2b17e797a43944e38babcac1ba02296cfd81623d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Chun-wei Fan <fanchunwei(a)src.gnome.org> +Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 09:22:38 +0000 +Subject: gio/gthreadedresolver.c: Fix non-UNIX build + +Move the GError *error declaration up, as that variable is also used for +non-Unix builds. +--- +diff --git a/gio/gthreadedresolver.c b/gio/gthreadedresolver.c +index 23f4360..2c2398e 100644 +--- a/gio/gthreadedresolver.c ++++ b/gio/gthreadedresolver.c +@@ -204,12 +204,12 @@ do_lookup_records (GTask *task, + { + LookupRecordsData *lrd = task_data; + GList *targets; ++ GError *error = NULL; + #if defined(G_OS_UNIX) + gint len = 512; + gint herr; + GByteArray *answer; + gint rrtype; +- GError *error = NULL; + + rrtype = _g_resolver_record_type_to_rrtype (lrd->record_type); + answer = g_byte_array_new (); +-- +cgit v0.9.0.2 diff --git a/mingw-glib2.spec b/mingw-glib2.spec index 580ada1..cf349bb 100644 --- a/mingw-glib2.spec +++ b/mingw-glib2.spec @@ -47,6 +47,9 @@ Patch1: 0001-Use-CreateFile-on-Win32-to-make-sure-g_unlink-always.patch # https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684145 Patch2: glib-build-dbus-proxy-testcase-only-on-unix.patch +# http://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/commit/?id=2b17e797a43944e38babcac1ba02296… +Patch3: glib-commit2b17e7.patch + %description MinGW Windows Glib2 library. @@ -90,6 +93,7 @@ Static version of the MinGW Windows GLib2 library. %patch0 -p1 %patch1 -p1 %patch2 -p1 +%patch3 -p1 autoreconf -i --force

1 0

[mingw-glib2] Update to 2.35.1
by Erik van Pienbroek 09 Nov '12

09 Nov '12

commit c3acf6294a7e01be8bca7c06a179ad3fae4f55d0 Author: Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> Date: Fri Nov 9 15:26:46 2012 +0100 Update to 2.35.1 mingw-glib2.spec | 5 ++++- sources | 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/mingw-glib2.spec b/mingw-glib2.spec index 038d5c7..580ada1 100644 --- a/mingw-glib2.spec +++ b/mingw-glib2.spec @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ %?mingw_package_header Name: mingw-glib2 -Version: 2.34.1 +Version: 2.35.1 Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: MinGW Windows GLib2 library @@ -270,6 +270,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name "*.la" -delete %changelog +* Fri Nov 9 2012 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.35.1-1 +- Update to 2.35.1 + * Sat Oct 20 2012 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> - 2.34.1-1 - Update to 2.34.1 diff --git a/sources b/sources index 17cdee8..9218fdb 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1 @@ -ee779493b083be9348a841e0a51f1b27 glib-2.34.1.tar.xz +6375a4441c2723fb155c8315f0eab26f glib-2.35.1.tar.xz

1 0

File glib-2.35.1.tar.xz uploaded to lookaside cache by epienbro
by Erik van Pienbroek 09 Nov '12

09 Nov '12

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for mingw-glib2: 6375a4441c2723fb155c8315f0eab26f glib-2.35.1.tar.xz

1 0

Mass rebuild report for November 6 2012
by Erik van Pienbroek 07 Nov '12

07 Nov '12

This is a report for the 20121106 mass rebuild of all Fedora MinGW packages against Fedora Rawhide. During this mass rebuild the following toolchain was used: * mingw-w64 20121016 trunk snapshot * binutils 2.22.52.0.4 * gcc 4.7.2 Statistics about current mass rebuild: -------------------------------------- Timestamp of mass rebuild: 20121106 Total packages: 150 Number of failed packages: 3 Number of succeeded packages: 147 Time needed to perform mass rebuild: 29 hours, 24 minutes, 23 seconds =============================================================================== The following packages FAILED to rebuild: mingw-gnutls-2.12.20-2 Package owner: rjones Time to build: 2 minutes, 47 seconds Build logs: http://build1.openftd.org/fedora-mingw-rebuild/20121106/mingw-gnutls-2.12.2… mingw-openssl-1.0.0d-7 Package owner: rjones Time to build: 1 minute, 40 seconds Build logs: http://build1.openftd.org/fedora-mingw-rebuild/20121106/mingw-openssl-1.0.0… mingw-wine-gecko-1.8-1 Package owner: awjb Time to build: 16 minutes, 42 seconds Build logs: http://build1.openftd.org/fedora-mingw-rebuild/20121106/mingw-wine-gecko-1.… =============================================================================== The following packages were rebuilt successfully: mingw-antlr-2.7.7-10 Time to build: 1 minute, 53 seconds mingw-atk-2.6.0-1 Time to build: 2 minutes, 4 seconds mingw-atkmm-2.22.6-5 Time to build: 2 minutes, 35 seconds mingw-binutils-2.22.52.0.4-2 Time to build: 7 minutes, 10 seconds mingw-boost-1.48.0-10 Time to build: 1 hour, 6 minutes, 36 seconds mingw-bzip2-1.0.6-2 Time to build: 1 minute, 15 seconds mingw-cairo-1.12.6-1 Time to build: 5 minutes, 36 seconds mingw-cairomm-1.10.0-8 Time to build: 2 minutes, 3 seconds mingw-celt051-0.5.1.3-10 Time to build: 1 minute, 33 seconds mingw-cppunit-1.12.1-10 Time to build: 1 minute, 3 seconds mingw-crossreport-8-3 Time to build: 5 minutes, 22 seconds mingw-crt-2.0.999-0.13.trunk.20121016 Time to build: 4 minutes, 17 seconds mingw-curl-7.25.0-2 Time to build: 7 minutes, 31 seconds mingw-cximage-600-7 Time to build: 3 minutes, 30 seconds mingw-cxxtest-3.10.1-10 Time to build: 20 seconds mingw-dbus-1.6.4-1 Time to build: 4 minutes, 5 seconds mingw-dirac-1.0.2-9 Time to build: 1 minute, 30 seconds mingw-dlfcn-0-0.14.r11 Time to build: 46 seconds mingw-enchant-1.6.0-7 Time to build: 2 minutes, 7 seconds mingw-expat-2.1.0-3 Time to build: 1 minute, 4 seconds mingw-filesystem-96-1 Time to build: 21 seconds mingw-fontconfig-2.10.1-2 Time to build: 2 minutes, 10 seconds mingw-freeglut-2.8.0-3 Time to build: 1 minute, 33 seconds mingw-freetype-2.4.10-2 Time to build: 1 minute, 51 seconds mingw-ftplib-3.1-6 Time to build: 36 seconds mingw-gcc-4.7.2-2 Time to build: 29 minutes, 56 seconds mingw-gdb-7.5-2 Time to build: 7 minutes, 35 seconds mingw-gdbm-1.8.0-10 Time to build: 53 seconds mingw-gdk-pixbuf-2.26.4-1 Time to build: 4 minutes, 22 seconds mingw-gettext-0.18.1.1-10 Time to build: 10 minutes, 52 seconds mingw-glib2-2.34.1-1 Time to build: 16 minutes, 57 seconds mingw-glibmm24-2.32.1-1 Time to build: 5 minutes, 29 seconds mingw-glib-networking-2.34.0-1 Time to build: 2 minutes, 45 seconds mingw-gmp-5.0.5-1 Time to build: 2 minutes, 54 seconds mingw-goocanvas2-2.0.1-5 Time to build: 3 minutes, 2 seconds mingw-gsl-1.15-3 Time to build: 4 minutes, 19 seconds mingw-gstreamer-0.10.36-2 Time to build: 4 minutes, 2 seconds mingw-gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-0.10.23-6 Time to build: 7 minutes, 46 seconds mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.36-2 Time to build: 5 minutes, 54 seconds mingw-gstreamer-plugins-good-0.10.31-7 Time to build: 6 minutes, 38 seconds mingw-gtk2-2.24.13-1 Time to build: 14 minutes, 48 seconds mingw-gtk3-3.6.1-1 Time to build: 12 minutes, 58 seconds mingw-gtkhtml3-4.4.0-2 Time to build: 6 minutes, 47 seconds mingw-gtkmm24-2.24.2-7 Time to build: 9 minutes, 45 seconds mingw-gtkmm30-3.4.0-2 Time to build: 9 minutes, 51 seconds mingw-gtksourceview3-3.4.1-2 Time to build: 3 minutes, 43 seconds mingw-gtk-vnc-0.5.1-2 Time to build: 4 minutes, 29 seconds mingw-harfbuzz-0.9.3-1 Time to build: 3 minutes, 7 seconds mingw-headers-2.0.999-0.13.trunk.20121016 Time to build: 1 minute, 18 seconds mingw-hunspell-1.3.2-7 Time to build: 2 minutes, 25 seconds mingw-icu-4.8.1.1-6 Time to build: 6 minutes, 53 seconds mingw-jasper-1.900.1-20 Time to build: 1 minute, 49 seconds mingw-libffi-3.0.11-0.4.rc2 Time to build: 1 minute, 7 seconds mingw-libgcrypt-1.5.0-5 Time to build: 3 minutes, 8 seconds mingw-libgeotiff-1.3.0-0.7.svn1664 Time to build: 1 minute, 29 seconds mingw-libglade2-2.6.4-14 Time to build: 3 minutes, 48 seconds mingw-libglademm24-2.6.7-16 Time to build: 2 minutes, 18 seconds mingw-libgnurx-2.5.1-13 Time to build: 1 minute, 4 seconds mingw-libgpg-error-1.10-3 Time to build: 1 minute, 56 seconds mingw-libidn-1.25-1 Time to build: 3 minutes, 16 seconds mingw-libjpeg-turbo-1.2.1-2 Time to build: 2 minutes, 21 seconds mingw-libltdl-2.4-7 Time to build: 51 seconds mingw-libogg-1.3.0-3 Time to build: 1 minute, 13 seconds mingw-liboil-0.3.16-7 Time to build: 1 minute, 43 seconds mingw-libosinfo-0.2.0-1 Time to build: 2 minutes, 29 seconds mingw-libpng-1.5.13-1 Time to build: 1 minute, 28 seconds mingw-libsigc++20-2.2.10-8 Time to build: 1 minute, 22 seconds mingw-libsigsegv-2.6-6 Time to build: 50 seconds mingw-libsoup-2.40.1-1 Time to build: 5 minutes, 38 seconds mingw-libsqlite3x-20071018-17 Time to build: 1 minute, 34 seconds mingw-libssh2-1.1-12 Time to build: 1 minute, 48 seconds mingw-libtasn1-2.13-1 Time to build: 1 minute, 39 seconds mingw-libtiff-4.0.2-1 Time to build: 4 minutes, 10 seconds mingw-libusbx-1.0.11-2 Time to build: 1 minute, 7 seconds mingw-libvirt-0.10.2-1 Time to build: 8 minutes, 4 seconds mingw-libvirt-glib-0.1.2-1 Time to build: 2 minutes, 45 seconds mingw-libvorbis-1.3.3-1 Time to build: 1 minute, 15 seconds mingw-libxml++-2.34.2-7 Time to build: 2 minutes, 18 seconds mingw-libxml2-2.9.0-1 Time to build: 4 minutes, 1 second mingw-libxslt-1.1.27-2 Time to build: 2 minutes, 29 seconds mingw-libzip-0.9-7 Time to build: 1 minute, 5 seconds mingw-llvm-3.0-5 Time to build: 23 minutes, 45 seconds mingw-matahari-0.5.0-1 Time to build: 3 minutes, 18 seconds mingw-nettle-2.4-2 Time to build: 2 minutes, 14 seconds mingw-nsis-2.46-8 Time to build: 2 minutes, 29 seconds mingw-nsiswrapper-9-4 Time to build: 19 seconds mingw-openjpeg-1.3-10 Time to build: 1 minute, 12 seconds mingw-orc-0.4.16-2 Time to build: 1 minute, 35 seconds mingw-p11-kit-0.13-1 Time to build: 3 minutes, 10 seconds mingw-pango-1.32.1-1 Time to build: 3 minutes, 27 seconds mingw-pangomm-2.28.4-4 Time to build: 4 minutes, 32 seconds mingw-pcre-8.30-2 Time to build: 2 minutes, 6 seconds mingw-pdcurses-3.4-13 Time to build: 1 minute, 11 seconds mingw-pixman-0.24.4-4 Time to build: 2 minutes, 18 seconds mingw-pkg-config-0.27-1 Time to build: 57 seconds mingw-plotmm-0.1.2-14 Time to build: 2 minutes, 19 seconds mingw-portablexdr-4.9.1-9 Time to build: 1 minute, 23 seconds mingw-proj-4.6.1-9 Time to build: 1 minute, 18 seconds mingw-pthreads-2.8.0-22.20110511cvs Time to build: 1 minute, 30 seconds mingw-qpid-cpp-0.14-4 Time to build: 18 minutes, 46 seconds mingw-qt-4.8.3-3 Time to build: 7 hours, 58 minutes, 28 seconds mingw-qt5-qt3d-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 11 minutes, 28 seconds mingw-qt5-qtactiveqt-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 3 minutes, 54 seconds mingw-qt5-qtbase-5.0.0-0.11.beta1 Time to build: 1 hour, 23 minutes, 37 seconds mingw-qt5-qtconnectivity-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 2 minutes, 46 seconds mingw-qt5-qtdeclarative-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 19 minutes, 20 seconds mingw-qt5-qtdoc-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 2 minutes, 27 seconds mingw-qt5-qtfeedback-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 2 minutes, 20 seconds mingw-qt5-qtgraphicaleffects-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 1 minute, 51 seconds mingw-qt5-qtimageformats-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 2 minutes, 29 seconds mingw-qt5-qtjsbackend-5.0.0-0.2.beta1 Time to build: 8 minutes, 39 seconds mingw-qt5-qtlocation-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 6 minutes, 56 seconds mingw-qt5-qtmultimedia-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 6 minutes, 58 seconds mingw-qt5-qtpim-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 6 minutes, 13 seconds mingw-qt5-qtquick1-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 11 minutes, 4 seconds mingw-qt5-qtscript-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 10 minutes, 32 seconds mingw-qt5-qtsensors-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 3 minutes, 18 seconds mingw-qt5-qtsvg-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 2 minutes, 38 seconds mingw-qt5-qtsystems-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 3 minutes, 57 seconds mingw-qt5-qttools-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 23 minutes, 6 seconds mingw-qt5-qttranslations-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 1 minute, 56 seconds mingw-qt5-qtwebkit-5.0.0-0.2.beta1 Time to build: 1 hour, 58 minutes, 45 seconds mingw-qt5-qtxmlpatterns-5.0.0-0.1.beta1 Time to build: 13 minutes, 13 seconds mingw-qwt-5.2.2-1 Time to build: 5 minutes, 44 seconds mingw-readline-5.2-13 Time to build: 1 minute, 53 seconds mingw-SDL-1.2.15-2 Time to build: 2 minutes, 3 seconds mingw-SDL_image-1.2.12-7 Time to build: 1 minute, 43 seconds mingw-SDL_mixer-1.2.12-2 Time to build: 1 minute, 40 seconds mingw-sigar-1.6.5-0.9.git58097d9 Time to build: 59 seconds mingw-spice-gtk-0.12-3 Time to build: 8 minutes, 17 seconds mingw-spice-protocol-0.10.1-2 Time to build: 44 seconds mingw-sqlite-3.7.9-7 Time to build: 2 minutes, 44 seconds mingw-srvany-1.0-9 Time to build: 1 minute, 1 second mingw-tcl-8.5.11-6 Time to build: 3 minutes, 50 seconds mingw-termcap-1.3.1-14 Time to build: 1 minute, 26 seconds mingw-tk-8.5.9-7 Time to build: 2 minutes, 5 seconds mingw-w64-tools-2.0.999-0.5.trunk.20120124 Time to build: 2 minutes, 21 seconds mingw-webkitgtk-1.10.1-1 Time to build: 2 hours, 31 minutes, 50 seconds mingw-webkitgtk3-1.10.1-1 Time to build: 2 hours, 11 minutes, 38 seconds mingw-win-iconv-0.0.4-1 Time to build: 1 minute, 33 seconds mingw-wpcap-4.1.final2-8 Time to build: 1 minute, 33 seconds mingw-wxWidgets-2.8.12-12 Time to build: 1 hour, 39 minutes, 27 seconds mingw-xerces-c-3.1.1-6 Time to build: 6 minutes, 31 seconds mingw-xz-5.1.2-2alpha Time to build: 2 minutes, 4 seconds mingw-zfstream-20041202-15 Time to build: 1 minute, 44 seconds mingw-zlib-1.2.5-11 Time to build: 1 minute, 42 seconds wine-mono-0.0.8-1 Time to build: 37 minutes, 43 seconds =============================================================================== Mass rebuild script for the Fedora MinGW packages written and maintained by Erik van Pienbroek (epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org)

1 0

[Bug 870455] cmake FindQt4 cannot find MinGW qconfig.pri
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Nov '12

07 Nov '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870455 --- Comment #8 from Erik van Pienbroek <erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl> --- The Fedora MinGW SIG recommends to use the mingw32-cmake / mingw64-cmake wrappers to call CMake with the proper environment set. Internally these wrappers call this RPM macro: %mingw32_cmake %{mingw32_env} ; \ if test -f CMakeLists.txt; then __mingw32_topdir=.; \\\ elif test -f ../CMakeLists.txt; then __mingw32_topdir=..; \\\ else __mingw32_topdir=""; fi; \\\ PATH=%{_prefix}/%{mingw32_target}/bin:$PATH %__cmake \\\ -DCMAKE_VERBOSE_MAKEFILE=ON \\\ -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=%{mingw32_prefix} \\\ -DCMAKE_INSTALL_LIBDIR:PATH=%{mingw32_libdir} \\\ -DINCLUDE_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=%{mingw32_includedir} \\\ -DLIB_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=%{mingw32_libdir} \\\ -DSYSCONF_INSTALL_DIR:PATH=%{mingw32_sysconfdir} \\\ -DSHARE_INSTALL_PREFIX:PATH=%{mingw32_datadir} \\\ %{?_cmake_skip_rpath} \\\ -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=ON \\\ -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=/usr/share/mingw/Toolchain-mingw32.cmake \\\ ${MINGW_CMAKE_ARGS} \\\ ${MINGW32_CMAKE_ARGS} \\\ "$@" $__mingw32_topdir If I understand the discussion above correctly then the QT_BINARY_DIR which is set in Toolchain-mingw32.cmake / Toolchain-mingw64.cmake is redundant and should be removed. I just tried to remove it from the toolchain file, but doing so causes mingw32-cmake to not be able to detect to qt tools (like moc and rcc) any more. I think this is because QT_BINARY_DIR will be set to /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin internally by CMake. However, this path only contains cross-compiled binaries. The native binaries belonging to the cross-compiled Qt are in /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/bin (we don't want to mix native and cross-compiled binaries in the same folder). In the FindQt4.cmake file there's this snippet of code: # ask qmake for the binary dir IF (NOT QT_BINARY_DIR OR QT_QMAKE_CHANGED) _qt4_query_qmake(QT_INSTALL_BINS qt_bins) SET(QT_BINARY_DIR ${qt_bins} CACHE INTERNAL "" FORCE) ENDIF (NOT QT_BINARY_DIR OR QT_QMAKE_CHANGED) The qmake variable QT_INSTALL_BINS is used by Qt's build system to determine where the (cross-)compiled binaries will be installed. I could try hack up the mingw-qt package so that QT_INSTALL_BINS points to /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/bin instead of /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin but that isn't the most elegant solution and I'm not sure what else will break because of this.. All qmake mkspecs profiles contain variables like QMAKE_MOC which points to the full path where the moc binary is installed. Ideally CMake should be able to use these variables instead of only searching for $QT_INSTALL_BINS/moc or $PATH/moc. Unfortunately these value for these variables can't be extracted with 'qmake-qt4 -query' so I guess a different solution should be searched.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 872753] CVE-2012-4190 freetype: memory corruption and application crash (reported against firefox on android)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Nov '12

05 Nov '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872753 --- Comment #5 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala <huzaifas(a)redhat.com> --- This issue does not affect the version of freetype as shipped with Fedora 16 and 17. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 872753] CVE-2012-4190 freetype: memory corruption and application crash (reported against firefox on android)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Nov '12

05 Nov '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872753 --- Comment #4 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala <huzaifas(a)redhat.com> --- Statement: Not Vulnerable. This issue does not affect the version of freetype as shipped with Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 and 6. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 872753] CVE-2012-4190 freetype: memory corruption and application crash (reported against firefox on android)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Nov '12

05 Nov '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872753 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala <huzaifas(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Whiteboard|impact=important,public=201 |impact=important,public=201 |21011,reported=20121012,sou |21011,reported=20121012,sou |rce=cve,cvss2=6.8/AV:N/AC:M |rce=cve,cvss2=6.8/AV:N/AC:M |/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P,rhel-5/fr |/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P,rhel-5/fr |eetype=new,rhel-6/freetype= |eetype=notaffected,rhel-6/f |new,fedora-all/freetype=new |reetype=notaffected,fedora- |,fedora-all/mingw32-freetyp |all/freetype=notaffected,fe |e=new |dora-all/mingw32-freetype=n | |otaffected --- Comment #3 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala <huzaifas(a)redhat.com> --- Hi Behdad, Agreed, thanks for looking into this though :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

Broken dependencies: mingw32-libpng
by Fedora Koji Build System 04 Nov '12

04 Nov '12

mingw32-libpng has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(zlib1.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-filesystem >= 0:63 mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-runtime Please resolve this as soon as possible.

1 0

Broken dependencies: mingw32-libpng
by Fedora Koji Build System 04 Nov '12

04 Nov '12

mingw32-libpng has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(zlib1.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-filesystem >= 0:63 mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-runtime Please resolve this as soon as possible.

1 0

[Bug 872753] CVE-2012-4190 freetype: memory corruption and application crash (reported against firefox on android)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Nov '12

03 Nov '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872753 Behdad Esfahbod <behdad(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed| |2012-11-02 21:24:06 --- Comment #2 from Behdad Esfahbod <behdad(a)fedoraproject.org> --- I read the upstream bug in full. It doesn't affect FreeType, or any other code we're interested in. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 872753] CVE-2012-4190 freetype: memory corruption and application crash (reported against firefox on android)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Nov '12

02 Nov '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=872753 Vincent Danen <vdanen(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |872754 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 872753] CVE-2012-4190 freetype: memory corruption and application crash (reported against firefox on android)
by Red Hat Bugzilla 02 Nov '12

02 Nov '12

1 0

Version Discrepancy Report
by Michael Cronenworth 01 Nov '12

01 Nov '12

------------------------------------------ MinGW/native package version discrepancies ------------------------------------------ Fedora N Matches Found: 43 Fedora Rawhide Matches Found: 42 +-------------------------------+ | f18 | rawhide | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | binutils | 2.23.51.0.1 | 2.23.51.0.3 | | mingw-binutils | 2.22.52.0.4 | 2.22.52.0.4 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | boost | 1.50.0 | 1.50.0 | | mingw-boost | 1.48.0 | 1.48.0 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | cairo | 1.12.4 | | | mingw-cairo | 1.10.2 | | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | curl | 7.27.0 | 7.28.0 | | mingw-curl | 7.25.0 | 7.25.0 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | dbus | 1.6.8 | 1.6.8 | | mingw-dbus | 1.6.4 | 1.6.4 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | gdb | 7.5.0.20120926 | 7.5.0.20120926 | | mingw-gdb | 7.5 | 7.5 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | gdbm | 1.10 | 1.10 | | mingw-gdbm | 1.8.0 | 1.8.0 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | glib-networking | 2.34.0 | 2.34.0 | | mingw-glib-networking | 2.32.1 | 2.32.1 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | glibmm24 | 2.33.14 | 2.33.14 | | mingw-glibmm24 | 2.32.1 | 2.32.1 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | gtkhtml3 | 4.5.91 | 4.5.91 | | mingw-gtkhtml3 | 4.4.0 | 4.4.0 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | gtkmm30 | 3.5.13 | 3.5.13 | | mingw-gtkmm30 | 3.4.0 | 3.4.0 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | gtksourceview3 | 3.6.0 | 3.6.0 | | mingw-gtksourceview3 | 3.4.1 | 3.4.1 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | harfbuzz | 0.9.4 | 0.9.5 | | mingw-harfbuzz | 0.9.3 | 0.9.3 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | icu | 49.1.1 | 49.1.1 | | mingw-icu | 4.8.1.1 | 4.8.1.1 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libffi | 3.0.10 | 3.0.10 | | mingw-libffi | 3.0.11 | 3.0.11 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libgeotiff | 1.2.5 | 1.2.5 | | mingw-libgeotiff | 1.3.0 | 1.3.0 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libsigc++20 | 2.2.11 | 2.2.11 | | mingw-libsigc++20 | 2.2.10 | 2.2.10 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libsigsegv | 2.10 | 2.10 | | mingw-libsigsegv | 2.6 | 2.6 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libssh2 | 1.4.2 | 1.4.2 | | mingw-libssh2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libtiff | 4.0.3 | 4.0.3 | | mingw-libtiff | 4.0.2 | 4.0.2 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libusbx | 1.0.14 | 1.0.14 | | mingw-libusbx | 1.0.11 | 1.0.11 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libvirt-glib | 0.1.3 | 0.1.3 | | mingw-libvirt-glib | 0.1.2 | 0.1.2 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libxml++ | 2.35.4 | 2.35.4 | | mingw-libxml++ | 2.34.2 | 2.34.2 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libxml2 | 2.9.0 | | | mingw-libxml2 | 2.8.0 | | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libxslt | 1.1.26 | | | mingw-libxslt | 1.1.27 | | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | libzip | 0.10.1 | 0.10.1 | | mingw-libzip | 0.9 | 0.9 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | llvm | 3.1 | 3.1 | | mingw-llvm | 3.0 | 3.0 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | matahari | 0.6.0 | 0.6.0 | | mingw-matahari | 0.5.0 | 0.5.0 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | openjpeg | 1.5.0 | 1.5.1 | | mingw-openjpeg | 1.3 | 1.3 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | openssl | 1.0.1c | 1.0.1c | | mingw-openssl | 1.0.0d | 1.0.0d | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | p11-kit | 0.14 | 0.14 | | mingw-p11-kit | 0.13 | 0.13 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | pcre | 8.31 | 8.31 | | mingw-pcre | 8.30 | 8.30 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | pixman | 0.26.2 | 0.27.4 | | mingw-pixman | 0.24.4 | 0.24.4 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | proj | 4.8.0 | 4.8.0 | | mingw-proj | 4.6.1 | 4.6.1 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | qpid-cpp | 0.18 | 0.18 | | mingw-qpid-cpp | 0.14 | 0.14 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | readline | 6.2 | 6.2 | | mingw-readline | 5.2 | 5.2 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | spice-gtk | 0.14 | 0.14 | | mingw-spice-gtk | 0.12 | 0.12 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | spice-protocol | 0.12.2 | 0.12.2 | | mingw-spice-protocol | 0.8.0 | 0.8.0 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | sqlite | 3.7.13 | 3.7.14 | | mingw-sqlite | 3.7.9 | 3.7.9 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | tcl | 8.5.12 | 8.5.12 | | mingw-tcl | 8.5.11 | 8.5.11 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | tk | 8.5.12 | 8.5.12 | | mingw-tk | 8.5.9 | 8.5.9 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | webkitgtk | 1.10.0 | | | mingw-webkitgtk | 1.10.1 | | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+ | zlib | 1.2.7 | 1.2.7 | | mingw-zlib | 1.2.5 | 1.2.5 | +-----------------------+---------------+---------------+

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw November 2012