mingw July 2012

mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org

7 participants
76 discussions

[Bug 819670] Review Request: mingw-llvm - MinGW LLVM libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '12

08 Jul '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670 --- Comment #14 from Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com> --- Thanks Michael! I'll look into why it wanted the native C++ compiler. I'm also working on updating this to llvm 3.1, which does have to build a native executable for llvm-config, which was formerly a script, so 3.1 will definitely need a native compiler. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 819670] Review Request: mingw-llvm - MinGW LLVM libraries
by Red Hat Bugzilla 08 Jul '12

08 Jul '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=819670 Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Eric Smith <eric(a)brouhaha.com> --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw-llvm Short Description: MinGW LLVM libraries for cross-development use Owners: brouhaha Branches: f17 el6 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 07 Jul '12

07 Jul '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 --- Comment #6 from greg.hellings(a)gmail.com --- http://dl.thehellings.com/mingw32/clucene/mingw-clucene-2.3.3.4-1.fc17.src.… http://dl.thehellings.com/mingw32/clucene/mingw-clucene.spec Uploaded new files as per the previous two posts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 825557] Review Request: mingw-clucene - CLucene 2.3.3.4 built for MinGW
by Red Hat Bugzilla 06 Jul '12

06 Jul '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557 --- Comment #5 from greg.hellings(a)gmail.com --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > I have uploaded an updated spec and src.rpm file to > > the same URLs as above if anyone else wants to take a look. > > Please bump the release and upload a new .src.rpm every time you make a > change. This makes it easier to compare changes between versions Noted. I figured the bumps should only happen once an actual build was released. My bad. > > Some additional review comments: > - The CMake argument -DDISABLE_MULTITHREADING=ON and > -D_CL_HAVE_WIN32_THREADS=0 are used in both the MINGW32_CMAKE_ARGS and the > MINGW64_CMAKE_ARGS. To reduce duplication, you might want to move these to > the %mingw_cmake call I still hope to fix the issue regarding threads on 32-bit architecture, as I know the 32-bit version can be built with threading support. Hence why I want to keep them separated until I can focus on that. > - The %clean section can be removed completely Will do. > - Why are the files %{mingw32_libdir}/CLuceneConfig.cmake and > %{mingw64_libdir}/CLuceneConfig.cmake dropped but not the files > %{mingw32_libdir}/CLucene/CLuceneConfig.cmake and > %{mingw64_libdir}/CLucene/CLuceneConfig.cmake. Shouldn't these two files be > dropped as well? The .cmake files are analagous to .pc files. Since they are supplied by the CLucene team they should be maintained, but they shouldn't be placed in the general %{mingw*_libdir}/ root. > - The CMake arguments -DLUCENE_SYS_INCLUDES:PATH=%{mingw32_libdir} and > -DLUCENE_SYS_INCLUDES:PATH=%{mingw64_libdir} shouldn't be needed for MinGW > packages. It looks like the native Fedora CLucene package uses it for > multilib support, but as Fedora MinGW doesn't use multilib this CMake > argument shouldn't be needed for this package I'll give it a go building without it and see how it works out. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 835686] Review Request: wine-mono - Mono library required for Wine
by Red Hat Bugzilla 05 Jul '12

05 Jul '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835686 Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed| |2012-07-05 11:23:02 --- Comment #14 from Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de> --- Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 835686] Review Request: wine-mono - Mono library required for Wine
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '12

04 Jul '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835686 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

Compiling code that uses GDI+?
by Georgios Petasis 04 Jul '12

04 Jul '12

Hi all, It seems that Gdiplus.h is missing from my Fedora 17 system. Is there a mingw package that provides it, or GDI+ is not supported? George

1 1

[Bug 835686] Review Request: wine-mono - Mono library required for Wine
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '12

04 Jul '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835686 Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de> --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: wine-mono Short Description: Mono library required for Wine Owners: awjb Branches: f17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 835686] Review Request: wine-mono - Mono library required for Wine
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '12

04 Jul '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835686 Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> --- Looks good. ================================================ The package wine-mono is APPROVED by mooninite ================================================ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 835686] Review Request: wine-mono - Mono library required for Wine
by Red Hat Bugzilla 04 Jul '12

04 Jul '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835686 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de> --- incorrect-fsf-address reported upstream: http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31121 http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-mono.spec http://fedora.lowlatency.de/review/wine-mono-0.0.4-7.fc17.src.rpm * Wed Jul 04 2012 Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert[AT]lowlatency.de> - 0.0.4-7 - add mingw-filesystem BR - fix header macro -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw July 2012