mingw

mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org

5907 discussions

Retire mingw package once unified in main package?
by Richard Shaw 03 Sep '22

03 Sep '22

Just wanted to check there's nothing special I need to do once I've unified the mingw build with the native package. I don't have a reason to do a build yet but I successfully performed a scratch build of fltk w/ the integrated mingw build. So it should be safe to retire mingw-fltk? Thanks, Richard

2 1

Planning to start unifying native and mingw packages
by Sandro Mani 24 Aug '22

24 Aug '22

Hi Following recent discussions and to reduce the maintenance burden, I'm planning to start merging native and mingw packages. Initially, I'll be looking at these packages where I maintain both variants: eigen3 mingw-eigen3 enchant2 mingw-enchant2 freeimage mingw-freeimage gdal mingw-gdal GeographicLib mingw-GeographicLib geos mingw-geos giflib mingw-giflib gtkspell3 mingw-gtkspell3 gtkspellmm30 mingw-gtkspellmm30 jxrlib mingw-jxrlib leptonica mingw-leptonica libgeotiff mingw-libgeotiff libimagequant mingw-libimagequant libkml mingw-libkml librttopo mingw-librttopo libspatialite mingw-libspatialite libwebp mingw-libwebp openjpeg2 mingw-openjpeg2 OpenSceneGraph mingw-OpenSceneGraph osgearth mingw-osgearth podofo mingw-podofo proj mingw-proj python-pillow mingw-python-pillow qtspell mingw-qtspell shapelib mingw-shapelib svg2svgt mingw-svg2svgt tesseract mingw-tesseract uriparser mingw-uriparser I'm performing test builds here [1]. Once I've got them all building there, if there are no objections, I plan to push to F37 and retire all the corresponding mingw repos. Sandro [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/smani/mingw-unified-spec/builds/

3 6

Re: Adding mingw64-gtk4 and mingw64-libadwaita
by Sim Tov 22 Jun '22

22 Jun '22

Unfortunately I don't know how to package for Fedora (or any other distro), but I have found this: https://packages.msys2.org/base/mingw-w64-gtk4 https://packages.msys2.org/base/mingw-w64-libadwaita https://packages.msys2.org/base/mingw-w64-gtksourceview5 How different is this from what Fedora needs? Or can this just be uploaded as is to Fedora?... On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 12:31 AM Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I'm afraid I'm not really in the position to answer questions about > libadwaita as I've never used it - I mostly cross-compile Qt5/6 apps to > Windows. > On 19.06.22 23:21, Sim Tov wrote: > > See it in action: > https://twitter.com/Puri_sm/status/1499852205301673997?s=20&t=Pk_1628ohy7Lt… > > The same code both for mobile and desktop... > > The question - will it work on Windows after cross-compilation?... > > On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 11:51 PM Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> What do you mean by convergent? >> On 19.06.22 22:50, Sim Tov wrote: >> >> Do you know whether the Windows applications indeed will be convergent >> (if built with mingw64-libadwaita)? >> >> On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 11:39 PM Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Well the best way to have a package included in the repos is packaging >>> it and submitting it for review. If you do so, I'm happy to review it. >>> >>> Sandro >>> On 19.06.22 22:35, Sim Tov wrote: >>> >>> Anybody here?... >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:46 AM Sim Tov <smntov(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Dear mingw maintainers, >>>> >>>> may I ask you, please, to add mingw64-gtk4 and mingw64-libadwaita to >>>> Fedora, so people can start cross-compile modern GTK4 applications for >>>> Windows. >>>> >>>> BTW, is it possible to cross-compile mingw64-libadwaita and make >>>> Windows builds of the applications convergent? It might be relevant for >>>> Windows based tablets. >>>> >>>> Gnome Text Editor requires this packages: >>>> >>>> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-text-editor/-/issues/149 >>>> >>>> Thank you! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mingw mailing list -- mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to mingw-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >>> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >>> >>>

3 4

Adding mingw64-gtk4 and mingw64-libadwaita
by Sim Tov 19 Jun '22

19 Jun '22

Dear mingw maintainers, may I ask you, please, to add mingw64-gtk4 and mingw64-libadwaita to Fedora, so people can start cross-compile modern GTK4 applications for Windows. BTW, is it possible to cross-compile mingw64-libadwaita and make Windows builds of the applications convergent? It might be relevant for Windows based tablets. Gnome Text Editor requires this packages: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-text-editor/-/issues/149 Thank you!

2 2

Standard DLL provides
by Sandro Mani 04 May '22

04 May '22

Hi Currently mingw-filesystem contains # (rpm -ql mingw32-crt | grep '\.a$' | while read f ; do i686-w64-mingw32-dlltool -I $f 2>/dev/null ; done) | sort | uniq | tr A-Z a-z > standard-dlls-mingw32 Source20: standard-dlls-mingw32 # (rpm -ql mingw64-crt | grep '\.a$' | while read f ; do x86_64-w64-mingw32-dlltool -I $f 2>/dev/null ; done) | sort | uniq | tr A-Z a-z > standard-dlls-mingw64 Source21: standard-dlls-mingw64 # (rpm -ql ucrt64-crt | grep '\.a$' | while read f ; do x86_64-w64-mingw32ucrt-dlltool -I $f 2>/dev/null ; done) | sort | uniq | tr A-Z a-z > standard-dlls-ucrt64 Source22: standard-dlls-ucrt64 and %package -n mingw32-filesystem [...] Provides: %(sed "s/$.*$/mingw32(\1) /g" %{SOURCE20} | tr "\n" " ") Provides: mingw32(mscoree.dll) %package -n mingw64-filesystem [...] Provides: %(sed "s/$.*$/mingw64(\1) /g" %{SOURCE21} | tr "\n" " ") Provides: mingw64(mscoree.dll) %package -n ucrt64-filesystem [...] Provides: %(sed "s/$.*$/ucrt64(\1) /g" %{SOURCE22} | tr "\n" " ") Provides: ucrt64(mscoree.dll) I wonder whether these standard DLL provides should be provided by mingw32-crt, mingw64 and ucrt64-crt instead? The provided DLLs depend on the mingw-w64 version (indeed I just had to update them for mingw-w64-10.0.0), and IMO it would be better to keep mingw-filesystem independent from the mingw-w64 version, i.e. to allow adding macros etc and allow simple git merges to update also the other branches. I'd proceed with removing these from mingw-filesystem, and adding to mingw-crt.spec: # Steps: # - Perform (scratch) build with bootstrap=1 # - Update the standard-dlls-xxx files as documented below, and rebuild with bootstrap=0 %global bootstrap 0 %if 0%{?bootstrap:1} # (rpm -ql mingw32-crt | grep '\.a$' | while read f ; do i686-w64-mingw32-dlltool -I $f 2>/dev/null ; done) | sort | uniq | tr A-Z a-z > standard-dlls-mingw32 Source1: standard-dlls-mingw32 # (rpm -ql mingw64-crt | grep '\.a$' | while read f ; do x86_64-w64-mingw32-dlltool -I $f 2>/dev/null ; done) | sort | uniq | tr A-Z a-z > standard-dlls-mingw64 Source2: standard-dlls-mingw64 # (rpm -ql ucrt64-crt | grep '\.a$' | while read f ; do x86_64-w64-mingw32ucrt-dlltool -I $f 2>/dev/null ; done) | sort | uniq | tr A-Z a-z > standard-dlls-ucrt64 Source3: standard-dlls-ucrt64 %endif %package -n mingw32-crt [...] %if 0%{?bootstrap:1} Provides: %(sed "s/$.*$/mingw32(\1) /g" %{SOURCE1} | tr "\n" " ") Provides: mingw32(mscoree.dll) %endif %package -n mingw64-crt [...] %if 0%{?bootstrap:1} Provides: %(sed "s/$.*$/mingw64(\1) /g" %{SOURCE2} | tr "\n" " ") Provides: mingw64(mscoree.dll) %endif %package -n ucrt64-crt [...] %if 0%{?bootstrap:1} Provides: %(sed "s/$.*$/ucrt64(\1) /g" %{SOURCE3} | tr "\n" " ") Provides: ucrt64(mscoree.dll) %endif Any comments/objections? Thanks Sandro

3 4

Fwd: Standard DLL provides
by Sandro Mani 03 May '22

03 May '22

On 03.05.22 17:16, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2022 at 04:46:34PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: >>>> Any comments/objections? >>>> >>>> >>>> That seems to make sense to me, is there a reason why it wasn't before? >>>> >> As far as I see mingw-filesystem provided the standard DLLs since >> the beginning of the package, perhaps @rjones can recall if there >> was a reason? > The reason for having the standard provides at all, or the reason they > are in mingw-filesystem? The reason for having them at all is just > for uniformity. You can "BuildRequires: mingw(wsock32.dll)" and not > care whether that comes from Windows/Wine or from Fedora. > > The reason they are in mingw-filesystem and not in mingw-crt is likely > just because we put them there without thinking about it too much. > (Or "filesystem" is the system environment). > > Anyway moving them seem sensible, I have no objections. Ok thanks, I'll proceed then. Sandro

1 0

HEADS UP: mingw-w64-10.0.0 coming to rawhide
by Sandro Mani 27 Apr '22

27 Apr '22

Hi I'll be updating to mingw-w64-10.0.0 in rawhide over the next day or two. I did an initial test-run here [1] and everything worked smoothly. Sandro [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/smani/mingw-w64-10.0.0/builds/

2 1

mingw-gcc-12.0.1 and mingw-binutils-2.38 coming to rawhide
by Sandro Mani 20 Apr '22

20 Apr '22

Hi As per [1] I'll be landing mingw-gcc-12.0.1 and mingw-binutils-2.38 towards the end of the week. I've completed test-builds here [2]. Sandro [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F37MingwEnvToolchainUpdate [2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/smani/mingw-gcc-12/

2 3

Re: Dropping wine from ARM
by Michael Cronenworth 02 Apr '22

02 Apr '22

On 3/30/22 8:42 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > That sounds like a bug in the package, because our LLVM build has all > targets enabled on Fedora: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/llvm/blob/rawhide/f/llvm.spec#_51-52 OK, bug filed. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2070151

3 14

Review requests: mingw-qt6-qtwebchannel, mingw-qt6-qttranslations
by Sandro Mani 31 Mar '22

31 Mar '22

Hi I've got two more mingw-qt6-* packages which are up for review, both are straight forward mingw/c++ packages. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009269 - mingw-qt6-qtwebchannel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2070708 - mingw-qt6-qttranslations Happy to review in exchange Thanks Sandro

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw