Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811909
--- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler kevin@tigcc.ticalc.org 2012-04-12 11:04:59 EDT --- That's not the correct solution. It will make the functions use the cdecl calling convention instead of stdcall upstream uses and thus make the bzip2 DLL we ship binary-incompatible with the upstream one.
Renaming the DLL's symbols to remove the default stdcall mangling (those @8 etc. suffixes) is also binary-incompatible.