hi, i update the openssl package to the latest rawhide plus my previous patches. the full hg diff is too large so i collect the changes:
- add all new patch files from openssl-0.9.8j-6.fc11.src.rpm
- mingw32-openssl-0.9.8g-shared.patch updated to mingw32-openssl-0.9.8j-shared.patch (attached)
- remove these patches since no longer needed: openssl-0.9.7-beta5-version-add-engines.patch openssl-0.9.7f-ca-dir.patch openssl-0.9.8a-enginesdir.patch openssl-0.9.8g-bn-mul-bug.patch openssl-0.9.8g-cve-2008-0891.patch openssl-0.9.8g-cve-2008-1671.patch openssl-0.9.8g-redhat.patch openssl-0.9.8g-shlib-version.patch openssl-0.9.8g-soversion.patch openssl-0.9.8g-speed-bug.patch
and my spec file patch which is attached where i try to merge with native spec file. a few comments about it: - rename with_tests to run_tests (since it's called in that way in ptheads package), - update the patch sections, - remove the gcc hack and replace Configure scripts with our macros, - enable pthread tests too - add files under pki/ - add license
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 02:08:29PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, i update the openssl package to the latest rawhide plus my previous patches. the full hg diff is too large so i collect the changes:
I looked over this, and it seems good to me. I'll apply the patch to our Mercurial repo later once I've done a bit more testing.
Rich.
I didn't really look into it in detail yet, but I got a build failure in Koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1097899&name=build.log
It built fine on my local machine though.
Rich.
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I didn't really look into it in detail yet, but I got a build failure in Koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1097899&name=build.log
It built fine on my local machine though.
it's really strange, since centos's patch can work with it:-( anyway here is a patch for the spec file and two new patch. of course 0.9.8j replace the previous 0.9.8g patches. previously i forget to send the configure patch and header was updated.
ps. you can also remove openssl-0.9.8a-enginesdir.patch from hg.
ACKed and applied to the Mercurial repository.
Rich.
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
ACKed and applied to the Mercurial repository.
now it seems to work for me on my centos-5 and on fedora: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1099869
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
ACKed and applied to the Mercurial repository.
in the meantime there is a newer native version:-( and here is the patches for this.
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 10:32:58PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
ACKed and applied to the Mercurial repository.
in the meantime there is a newer native version:-( and here is the patches for this.
Is this patch still waiting for attention?
Rich.
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 10:32:58PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
ACKed and applied to the Mercurial repository.
in the meantime there is a newer native version:-( and here is the patches for this.
Is this patch still waiting for attention?
yes imho should have to apply to the hg (at least this still diff from the hg repo). anyway why is there the hg repo when openssl is in fedora cvs?
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:57:54PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 10:32:58PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
ACKed and applied to the Mercurial repository.
in the meantime there is a newer native version:-( and here is the patches for this.
Is this patch still waiting for attention?
yes imho should have to apply to the hg (at least this still diff from the hg repo). anyway why is there the hg repo when openssl is in fedora cvs?
I should have removed it from the hg repository, and if I didn't then that's a mistake. As is the case here, so I'll remove it shortly.
Can you repost the latest version of your patch against the Fedora CVS, and I'll try to take a look at it on Monday.
Rich.
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 11:57:54PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 10:32:58PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
ACKed and applied to the Mercurial repository.
in the meantime there is a newer native version:-( and here is the patches for this.
Is this patch still waiting for attention?
yes imho should have to apply to the hg (at least this still diff from the hg repo). anyway why is there the hg repo when openssl is in fedora cvs?
I should have removed it from the hg repository, and if I didn't then that's a mistake. As is the case here, so I'll remove it shortly.
Can you repost the latest version of your patch against the Fedora CVS, and I'll try to take a look at it on Monday.
sorry, fedora cvs already contains the latest version i just check against the hg wrongly:-(