hi, thoughts about mingw32-pthreads: replace %{crazy_version} with `echo %{version}|tr . -`
in the build section put the clean after the first build: make clean
make CROSS=%{_mingw32_host}- GC-inlined
make CROSS=%{_mingw32_host}- GCE-inlined afais GCE-inlined has different defines so probably a clean would be useful before it.
add -mms-bitfields or even better %_mingw32_cflags to OPT probably only way to do this is a patch for the makefile. the same applys to the CFLAGS in the test dir.
anyway it's a clear package.
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 02:01:07PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote: [...]
Yes, these are all possibilities. Do you have a proposed patch? Do you use this package?
Rich.
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 02:01:07PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote: [...]
Yes, these are all possibilities. Do you have a proposed patch? Do you use this package?
yes we use it. as i come back may be this week i'll have some free time for this too.
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 02:01:07PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote: [...]
Yes, these are all possibilities. Do you have a proposed patch? Do you use this package?
here's the proposed patch:-) we plan to use. anyway at the beginning of dec we switch back to the old mingw system since the new compiler and tool generated exes work strange (ie. it works but looks like some internal params changed, but may be it was only our fault, we'll look into it in jan).
Farkas Levente wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 02:01:07PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote: [...]
Yes, these are all possibilities. Do you have a proposed patch? Do you use this package?
here's the proposed patch:-) we plan to use. anyway at the beginning of dec we switch back to the old mingw system since the new compiler and tool generated exes work strange (ie. it works but looks like some internal params changed, but may be it was only our fault, we'll look into it in jan).
and may be useful to update the filesystem br line too. here's the updated patch.
Applied to Mercurial, thanks.
Rich.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 04:55:17PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
we plan to use. anyway at the beginning of dec we switch back to the old mingw system since the new compiler and tool generated exes work strange (ie. it works but looks like some internal params changed, but may be it was only our fault, we'll look into it in jan).
This is disturbing news :-( Do you have any handle on why you cannot use our Fedora MinGW packages?
Rich.
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 04:55:17PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
we plan to use. anyway at the beginning of dec we switch back to the old mingw system since the new compiler and tool generated exes work strange (ie. it works but looks like some internal params changed, but may be it was only our fault, we'll look into it in jan).
This is disturbing news :-( Do you have any handle on why you cannot use our Fedora MinGW packages?
it's more complicated. until i manage to build all required libs too in fedora's mingw i won't try it again. that's way i now work on openssl and ptheads etc (but still i have only one day/week:-()
-
Farkas Levente -
Richard W.M. Jones