https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=825557
Kalev Lember kalevlember@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |kalevlember@gmail.com Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |kalevlember@gmail.com
--- Comment #12 from Kalev Lember kalevlember@gmail.com --- Hi Greg,
Like we talked on IRC, I'm now a sponsor and going to help you become an official packager.
The spec file here looks very nice, but I have a question about the package naming, which is currently:
upstream tarball: clucene-core source package: mingw-clucene binary packages: mingw32-clucene-core / mingw64-clucene-core
Some of the things are called "clucene", and some "clucene-core". Wouldn't it make sense to stick with one name everywhere? I think it's a bit confusing to have different names for the source and binary packages; in the mingw packaging we've so far tried to keep them the same to keep the packaging simple and avoid confusion.
-
Red Hat Bugzilla