Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722707
--- Comment #6 from Randall "Randy" Berry <randyn3lrx(a)gmail.com>
2011-07-17 06:24:41 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Actually, the naming is OK.
Now that I do further research shouldn't the name be mingw32-libvorbis so that
it matches the naming scheme of the mingw32 packages?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW#Package_naming
Package naming
Built packages should be named by prefixing the upstream package name with
mingw32-
Source packages can be named starting with mingw- in order to more easily
support a transition to the new MinGW guidelines which mandate that naming.
Otherwise two separate package repositories must be set up ("mingw32-foo" and
"mingw-foo") with one needing to be marked EOL.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.