hi, what about my openssl patch? i'd like to work on the new upstream openssl merge too.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:43:20PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, what about my openssl patch? i'd like to work on the new upstream openssl merge too.
Yes, I hate openssl too.
Probably best if you go ahead and rebase to the new openssl and then post an updated patch.
Rich.
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:43:20PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, what about my openssl patch? i'd like to work on the new upstream openssl merge too.
Yes, I hate openssl too.
Probably best if you go ahead and rebase to the new openssl and then post an updated patch.
ok the first question what we do with ca-certificates? on fedora it's been removed from openssl and a new packages created for this. do we create a new mingw32 packages?
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 04:01:01PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:43:20PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, what about my openssl patch? i'd like to work on the new upstream openssl merge too.
Yes, I hate openssl too.
Probably best if you go ahead and rebase to the new openssl and then post an updated patch.
ok the first question what we do with ca-certificates? on fedora it's been removed from openssl and a new packages created for this. do we create a new mingw32 packages?
If the file is identical (or very similar) to the one in the native Fedora package, then we should probably just drop the file.
Rich.
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 04:01:01PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:43:20PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, what about my openssl patch? i'd like to work on the new upstream openssl merge too.
Yes, I hate openssl too.
Probably best if you go ahead and rebase to the new openssl and then post an updated patch.
ok the first question what we do with ca-certificates? on fedora it's been removed from openssl and a new packages created for this. do we create a new mingw32 packages?
If the file is identical (or very similar) to the one in the native Fedora package, then we should probably just drop the file.
the question: do we need the ca certs on win32? since the ca-certificates package contains only root ca's cert.
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 02:18:05PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 04:01:01PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 01:43:20PM +0100, Farkas Levente wrote:
hi, what about my openssl patch? i'd like to work on the new upstream openssl merge too.
Yes, I hate openssl too.
Probably best if you go ahead and rebase to the new openssl and then post an updated patch.
ok the first question what we do with ca-certificates? on fedora it's been removed from openssl and a new packages created for this. do we create a new mingw32 packages?
If the file is identical (or very similar) to the one in the native Fedora package, then we should probably just drop the file.
the question: do we need the ca certs on win32? since the ca-certificates package contains only root ca's cert.
I have absolutely no idea.
Rich.
-
Farkas Levente -
Richard W.M. Jones