[Bug 499992] New: Review Request: mingw32-WebKit - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: mingw32-WebKit - MinGW Windows web content engine library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

Summary: Review Request: mingw32-WebKit - MinGW Windows web
                    content engine library
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: low
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: [e-mail]
        ReportedBy: [e-mail]
         QAContact: [e-mail]
                CC: [e-mail], [e-mail],
                    [e-mail]
        Depends on: 499983,499986,499991
    Classification: Fedora

Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-WebKit.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-WebKit-1.1.5-1.fc11.src.rpm
Description:
WebKit is an open source web browser engine.

Koji scratch build: none for now because mingw32-libsoup, mingw32-libxslt and
mingw32-libidn aren't in Fedora yet

Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-WebKit - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

--- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler   2009-05-10 06:24:27 EDT ---
The native package is now built from a SRPM called webkitgtk, the MinGW package
should probably be based on that.

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

Erik van Pienbroek  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Review Request:             |Review Request:
                   |mingw32-WebKit - MinGW      |mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW
                   |Windows web content engine  |Windows web content engine
                   |library                     |library

--- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek   2009-05-10 16:47:32 EDT ---
This .spec file is based on the native WebKit package from just before the
rename. I've renamed the package now to mingw32-webkitgtk and updated it to
version 1.1.6 (the current version of the native package), but I can't get it
compiled yet because upstream has added a dependency on enchant which we don't
have packaged in our mingw toolchain yet. I'll try to package mingw32-enchant
ASAP and also put it up for review.

New Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk.spec
New SRPM URL:
http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk-1.1.6-1.fc11.src.rpm

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

--- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek   2009-05-11 07:34:22 EDT ---
Just tried to package mingw32-enchant, but it can't be compiled right now
because the C functions _lock_file and _unlock_file aren't present in the MinGW
headers/libraries yet:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/8w5bsb4f%28VS.80%29.aspx

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

--- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek   2009-05-20 10:02:27 EDT ---
The _lock_file issue has been reported upstream by Ryan McDougall (sempuki) @
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2794382&group_id=24...

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Fridrich Strba]

Check the enchant package in the url I mentioned in the "Worth
considering" thread. Or check the SVN of enchant. I submitted all the
patches that are needed to cross-compile it with mingw.

Cheers

Fridrich

On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 10:02 -0400, bugzilla-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR
[e-mail] wrote:
> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
> comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992
>
> --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek   2009-05-20 10:02:27 EDT ---
> The _lock_file issue has been reported upstream by Ryan McDougall (sempuki) @
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2794382&group_id=24...

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Erik van Pienbroek]

Op woensdag 20-05-2009 om 19:29 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Fridrich
Strba:
> Check the enchant package in the url I mentioned in the "Worth
> considering" thread. Or check the SVN of enchant. I submitted all the
> patches that are needed to cross-compile it with mingw.
>
> Cheers
>
> Fridrich

Ah, thx for the heads up!

Upon further investigation it looks like the _lock_file issue was
already solved for several months in the enchant SVN:
http://www.abisource.com/viewvc?limit_changes=100&view=rev&revision=...
It's strange there hasn't been any new release of enchant, the last
release was over a year ago...

Anyway, with this patch I can get enchant compiled and packaged, so a
review request can be expected soon :)

Regards,

Erik van Pienbroek

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

Erik van Pienbroek  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Depends on|                            |502388

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

--- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek   2009-05-24 13:58:39 EDT ---
The libraries enchant and hunspell (dependency for enchant) are now packaged
and ready for review (bug 502388 and bug 502387).

Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk-1.1.7-1.fc11.src.rpm

* Fri May 22 2009 Erik van Pienbroek  - 1.1.7-1
- Update to 1.1.7

* Sun May 10 2009 Erik van Pienbroek  - 1.1.6-1
- Update to 1.1.6
- Updated the patches to apply cleanly against version 1.1.6
- Renamed the package to mingw32-webkitgtk
- Merged the changes from the native webkitgtk package up to 1.1.6-1
- Added a BR: mingw32-enchant (required as of version 1.1.6)

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

Rafael Aquini  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

Bug 499992 depends on bug 499986, which changed state.

Bug 499986 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986

What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED

Bug 499992 depends on bug 499983, which changed state.

Bug 499983 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libsoup - MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499983

What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED

Bug 499992 depends on bug 499991, which changed state.

Bug 499991 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499991

What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|                            |NEXTRELEASE
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED

Bug 499992 depends on bug 502388, which changed state.

Bug 502388 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388

What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         Resolution|                            |ERRATA
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED

--- Comment #6 from Rafael Aquini  2010-08-19 21:22:59 EDT ---
PING

It's been more than a year with no progress; This review should be closed soon
if there is no response, shouldn't it?

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

Richard W.M. Jones  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[e-mail]

--- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones  2010-08-20 03:42:55 EDT ---
Ditto, leave these bugs open.  They don't harm anyone.

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

--- Comment #8 from Rafael Aquini  2010-08-20 08:06:15 EDT ---
Richard,

Same as Bug 479874:

This is a janitorial work on Fedora Package Review queues, 
-- http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ -- in order to identify and
close stalled reviews.

I'm just following this policy:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews

Regards

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

--- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-08-20 08:11:55 EDT ---
A review ticket without a submitter is useless and needs to be closed.  We have
few enough reviewers as it is without having them waste time on packages where
they will receive no response from the submitter.

In any case, if another submitter wants to take up this package, they should
open their own review ticket.  So this one must be closed in any case.

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

Richard W.M. Jones  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Status Whiteboard|                            |NotReady

--- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones  2010-08-20 08:43:05 EDT ---
Does adding NotReady to the Whiteboard help?

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

Erik van Pienbroek  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Status Whiteboard|NotReady                    |

--- Comment #11 from Erik van Pienbroek  2010-11-07 12:30:47 EST ---
New Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk.spec
New SRPM URL:
http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk-1.2.5-1.fc14.src.rpm

* Sun Nov  7 2010 Erik van Pienbroek  - 1.2.5-1
- Update to 1.2.5
- Automatically generate debuginfo subpackage
- Use %global instead of %define
- Dropped the manual strip command
- Dropped old patches

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

--- Comment #12 from Erik van Pienbroek  2010-11-11 19:34:15 EST ---
The Koji scratch build has completed successfully as well:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2595924

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

--- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-11-13 15:11:27 EST ---
I note that F14 is at webkitgtk 1.3.4 (and 1.3.6 is in testing), so this
package violates
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW#Track_Fedora_native_package_ve...

Is there a specific reason to stay with 1.2.5?

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

--- Comment #14 from Erik van Pienbroek  2010-11-13 18:33:33 EST ---
While updating the package I wasn't aware that F14 was bundling a development
version of webkitgtk. I just took the latest stable version which is 1.2.5.

I'll try to provide a more recent version ASAP

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

--- Comment #15 from Erik van Pienbroek  2010-11-14 13:39:49 EST ---
New Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk.spec
New SRPM URL:
http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-1.fc14.src.rpm
Koji scratch build (F15):
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2600627

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
         AssignedTo|[e-mail]    |[e-mail]
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-11-16 10:54:26 EST ---
This is a huge build, and the debuginfo package is hilarious; one of the debug
files is over a gigabyte.  Fortunately it compresses pretty well.

Note that Fedora doesn't need BuildRoot:, %clean or the first line of %install.

I think the main package %description probably needs mention of MinGW
somewhere.

The license information seems to be missing.  The regular webkitgtk package
puts it in the -doc subpackage, which is actually a guideline violation, but
you seem to drop the -doc package altogether so it doesn't get in at all.

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:
  c9bdd5eb544d9447dbfa117cac2c925b6d09091a6a9798c71f2d2e6d5ab542f9
   webkit-1.3.6.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
? description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
X license text not included in package.
* version packaged is the same as the native Fedora version.
* package is noarch.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* special mingw32 dependency generators are used.
* final provides and requires are sane:
  mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-1.fc15.noarch.rpm
   mingw32(libwebkitgtk-1.0-0.dll)  
   mingw32-webkitgtk = 1.3.6-1.fc15
  =
   mingw32-filesystem >= 63
   mingw32-runtime  
   mingw32(kernel32.dll)  
   mingw32(libatk-1.0-0.dll)  
   mingw32(libcairo-2.dll)  
   mingw32(libenchant.dll)  
   mingw32(libgailutil-18.dll)  
   mingw32(libgcc_s_sjlj-1.dll)  
   mingw32(libgdk_pixbuf-2.0-0.dll)  
   mingw32(libgdk-win32-2.0-0.dll)  
   mingw32(libgio-2.0-0.dll)  
   mingw32(libglib-2.0-0.dll)  
   mingw32(libgmodule-2.0-0.dll)  
   mingw32(libgnutls-26.dll)  
   mingw32(libgobject-2.0-0.dll)  
   mingw32(libgthread-2.0-0.dll)  
   mingw32(libgtk-win32-2.0-0.dll)  
   mingw32(libjpeg-7.dll)  
   mingw32(libpango-1.0-0.dll)  
   mingw32(libpangocairo-1.0-0.dll)  
   mingw32(libpng14-14.dll)  
   mingw32(libsoup-2.4-1.dll)  
   mingw32(libsqlite3-0.dll)  
   mingw32(libstdc++-6.dll)  
   mingw32(libwebkitgtk-1.0-0.dll)  
   mingw32(libxml2-2.dll)  
   mingw32(libxslt-1.dll)  
   mingw32(msvcrt.dll)  
   mingw32(ole32.dll)  
   mingw32(pthreadgc2.dll)  
   mingw32(user32.dll)

mingw32-webkitgtk-static-1.3.6-1.fc15.noarch.rpm
   mingw32-webkitgtk-static = 1.3.6-1.fc15
  =
   mingw32-webkitgtk = 1.3.6-1.fc15
   mingw32-filesystem >= 63
   mingw32-runtime

* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* static libraries are in a separate -static subpackage.
* .dll and .def files in _mingw32_bindir
* .dll.a and .la files in _mingw32_libdir
* dll files are listed explicitly in %files.
* libraries and executables are stripped properly.

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

--- Comment #17 from Erik van Pienbroek  2010-11-16 13:35:31 EST ---
Yeah, this package is a huge beast to get compiled. I don't know why the
(unstripped) binaries are so huge. The debug .so file in native Fedora package
also is quite huge, over 600MB
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=2250732) so I guess it's
something we have to live with.

I just updated published packages where all your review comments are taken care
of.

New Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk.spec
New SRPM URL:
http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-2.fc14.src.rpm

* Tue Nov 16 2010 Erik van Pienbroek  - 1.3.6-2
- Improved the description
- Bundle the various license files
- Dropped the BuildRoot tag, the %%clean section and the
  'rm -rf %{buildroot}' from the %%install section as they
  aren't needed anymore these days

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

Jason Tibbitts  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-11-16 13:42:54 EST ---
Great, thanks.  I'm not going to bother building this because it takes a while
even on my fast builder, but everything looks fine from looking at the spec.

APPROVED

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

Erik van Pienbroek  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |fedora-cvs?

--- Comment #19 from Erik van Pienbroek  2010-11-16 13:57:26 EST ---
Thanks for the review!

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: mingw32-webkitgtk
Short Description: MinGW Windows web content engine library
Owners: epienbro
Branches: f14 el5 el6
InitialCC:

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

--- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-11-16 14:03:14 EST ---
I may have led you astray; Fedora doesn't need it and EL6 doesn't need it, but
el5, being ancient, still needs BuildRoot, %clean and so on.

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

--- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts  2010-11-17 10:58:16 EST ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |MODIFIED

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System  2010-12-08 18:02:43 EST ---
mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-2.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-2.fc14

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |ON_QA

--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System  2010-12-09 16:59:17 EST ---
mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mingw32-webkitgtk'.  You can
provide feedback for this update here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-2.fc14

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System  2010-12-17 15:32:11 EST ---
mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

[Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library

[Red Hat Bugzilla]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992

Fedora Update System  changed:

What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version|                            |mingw32-webkitgtk-1.3.6-2.f
                   |                            |c14
         Resolution|                            |ERRATA
        Last Closed|                            |2010-12-17 15:32:18