11:30 p.m.
morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds for me at home on Time
Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red Hat.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653
Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com) 2009-05-07 10:59:53 EDT
(-) [reply]
Description of problem:
Downloading Packages:
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...:
[Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is unreachable')>
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 10 x86_64
How reproducible:
Everytime since last few days
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10.
2.
3.
Actual results:
yum uses mirror site to update for all packages
Expected results:
yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its available. We
do not expect it to be down for too long.
Additional info:
My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on Lenovo
laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so far.
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
12:22 a.m.
which ip address I wonder is the user using? v4/v6? which?
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds
for me at home on Time Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red
Hat.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653
Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com) 2009-05-07 10:59:53 EDT
(-) [reply]
Description of problem:
Downloading Packages:
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...:
[Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is unreachable')>
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 10 x86_64
How reproducible:
Everytime since last few days
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10.
2.
3.
Actual results:
yum uses mirror site to update for all packages
Expected results:
yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its available. We
do not expect it to be down for too long.
Additional info:
My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on Lenovo
laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so far.
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
8:09 a.m.
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:7E:13:4A:68
inet addr:10.17.14.64 Bcast:10.17.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::224:7eff:fe13:4a68/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1112 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1081 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:663504 (647.9 KiB) TX bytes:177423 (173.2 KiB)
Memory:fc000000-fc020000
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 12:22:10 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
which ip address I wonder is the user using? v4/v6? which?
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds
for me at home on Time Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red
Hat.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653
Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com) 2009-05-07 10:59:53 EDT
(-) [reply]
Description of problem:
Downloading Packages:
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...:
[Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is unreachable')>
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 10 x86_64
How reproducible:
Everytime since last few days
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10.
2.
3.
Actual results:
yum uses mirror site to update for all packages
Expected results:
yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its available. We
do not expect it to be down for too long.
Additional info:
My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on Lenovo
laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so far.
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
8:10 a.m.
It failed from my hotel as well (outside Red Hat network).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raj Ramamoorthy" <rramamoo(a)redhat.com>
To: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org, "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 8:09:08 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:7E:13:4A:68
inet addr:10.17.14.64 Bcast:10.17.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::224:7eff:fe13:4a68/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1112 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1081 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:663504 (647.9 KiB) TX bytes:177423 (173.2 KiB)
Memory:fc000000-fc020000
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 12:22:10 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
which ip address I wonder is the user using? v4/v6? which?
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds
for me at home on Time Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red
Hat.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653
Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com) 2009-05-07 10:59:53 EDT
(-) [reply]
Description of problem:
Downloading Packages:
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...:
[Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is unreachable')>
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 10 x86_64
How reproducible:
Everytime since last few days
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10.
2.
3.
Actual results:
yum uses mirror site to update for all packages
Expected results:
yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its available. We
do not expect it to be down for too long.
Additional info:
My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on Lenovo
laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so far.
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
8:27 a.m.
[rramamoo@rramamoo ~]$ traceroute fedora.secsup.org
traceroute to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 unused (10.17.14.254) 1.987 ms 2.170 ms 2.127 ms
2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 2.386 ms 2.331 ms 2.279 ms
3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 2.204 ms 2.437 ms 2.392 ms
4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 2.345 ms 2.539 ms 2.801 ms
5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 20.222 ms 20.180 ms 20.132 ms
6 500.ATM7-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.145) 20.026 ms 20.045 ms 20.659 ms
7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.618 ms 20.915 ms 20.877 ms
8 * * *
9 * * *
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 * * *
13 * * *
14 * * *
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
-----Original Message-----
From: Raj Ramamoorthy [mailto:rramamoo@redhat.com]
Sent: Fri 5/8/2009 8:10 AM
To: Chris Morrow
Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org; Domsch, Matt
Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
It failed from my hotel as well (outside Red Hat network).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raj Ramamoorthy" <rramamoo(a)redhat.com>
To: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org, "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 8:09:08 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:7E:13:4A:68
inet addr:10.17.14.64 Bcast:10.17.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::224:7eff:fe13:4a68/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1112 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1081 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:663504 (647.9 KiB) TX bytes:177423 (173.2 KiB)
Memory:fc000000-fc020000
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 12:22:10 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
which ip address I wonder is the user using? v4/v6? which?
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds
for me at home on Time Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red
Hat.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653
Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com) 2009-05-07 10:59:53 EDT
(-) [reply]
Description of problem:
Downloading Packages:
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...:
[Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is unreachable')>
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 10 x86_64
How reproducible:
Everytime since last few days
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10.
2.
3.
Actual results:
yum uses mirror site to update for all packages
Expected results:
yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its available. We
do not expect it to be down for too long.
Additional info:
My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on Lenovo
laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so far.
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
9:47 a.m.
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
[rramamoo@rramamoo ~]$ traceroute fedora.secsup.org
traceroute to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 unused (10.17.14.254) 1.987 ms 2.170 ms 2.127 ms
2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 2.386 ms 2.331 ms 2.279 ms
3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 2.204 ms 2.437 ms 2.392 ms
4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 2.345 ms 2.539 ms 2.801 ms
5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 20.222 ms 20.180 ms 20.132 ms
6 500.ATM7-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.145) 20.026 ms 20.045 ms 20.659 ms
7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.618 ms 20.915 ms 20.877 ms
that's a firewall, traceroute/ping are rarely your friend for finding
end-system state... tcptraceroute though might help here.
on the other hand (from a non-701 connected host):
[morrowc@usa1 ~]$ wget
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
--2009-05-08 14:46:38--
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
Resolving fedora.secsup.org... 208.209.50.21,
2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1114, 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1111,
...
Connecting to fedora.secsup.org|208.209.50.21|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 321670 (314K) [text/plain]
Saving to: `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm'
100%[======================================>] 321,670 367K/s in
0.9s
2009-05-08 14:46:40 (367 KB/s) -
`gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm' saved [321670/321670]
so... 'works for me!' ??
8 * * *
9 * * *
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 * * *
13 * * *
14 * * *
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
-----Original Message-----
From: Raj Ramamoorthy [mailto:rramamoo@redhat.com]
Sent: Fri 5/8/2009 8:10 AM
To: Chris Morrow
Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org; Domsch, Matt
Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
It failed from my hotel as well (outside Red Hat network).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raj Ramamoorthy" <rramamoo(a)redhat.com>
To: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org, "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 8:09:08 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:7E:13:4A:68
inet addr:10.17.14.64 Bcast:10.17.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::224:7eff:fe13:4a68/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1112 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1081 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:663504 (647.9 KiB) TX bytes:177423 (173.2 KiB)
Memory:fc000000-fc020000
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 12:22:10 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
which ip address I wonder is the user using? v4/v6? which?
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
> morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds for me at home on
Time Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red Hat.
>
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653
>
> Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com) 2009-05-07 10:59:53
EDT (-) [reply]
>
> Description of problem:
>
> Downloading Packages:
>
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...:
> [Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is unreachable')>
>
>
> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
> Fedora 10 x86_64
>
> How reproducible:
> Everytime since last few days
>
> Steps to Reproduce:
> 1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10.
> 2.
> 3.
>
> Actual results:
> yum uses mirror site to update for all packages
>
> Expected results:
> yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its available. We
> do not expect it to be down for too long.
>
> Additional info:
> My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on Lenovo
> laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so far.
>
>
>
> --
> Matt Domsch
> Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
> linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
>
>
>
>
9:53 a.m.
[root@rramamoo rramamoo]# tcptraceroute fedora.secsup.org
Selected device eth0, address 10.17.14.64, port 42624 for outgoing packets
Tracing the path to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21) on TCP port 80 (http), 30 hops max
1 10.17.14.254 0.704 ms 0.287 ms 0.652 ms
2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 1.237 ms 1.215 ms 1.052 ms
3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 1.338 ms 1.446 ms 1.296 ms
4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 1.315 ms 1.443 ms 1.454 ms
5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 62.352 ms 20.014 ms 20.224 ms
6 500.ATM4-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.137) 20.511 ms 22.391 ms 19.830 ms
7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.590 ms 30.110 ms 20.724 ms
8 * * *
9 208.209.50.21 [open] 20.334 ms 20.514 ms 22.031 ms
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 9:47:35 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: RE: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
[rramamoo@rramamoo ~]$ traceroute fedora.secsup.org
traceroute to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 unused (10.17.14.254) 1.987 ms 2.170 ms 2.127 ms
2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 2.386 ms 2.331 ms 2.279 ms
3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 2.204 ms 2.437 ms 2.392 ms
4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 2.345 ms 2.539 ms 2.801 ms
5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 20.222 ms 20.180 ms 20.132 ms
6 500.ATM7-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.145) 20.026 ms 20.045 ms 20.659 ms
7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.618 ms 20.915 ms 20.877 ms
that's a firewall, traceroute/ping are rarely your friend for finding
end-system state... tcptraceroute though might help here.
on the other hand (from a non-701 connected host):
[morrowc@usa1 ~]$ wget
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
--2009-05-08 14:46:38--
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
Resolving fedora.secsup.org... 208.209.50.21,
2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1114, 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1111,
...
Connecting to fedora.secsup.org|208.209.50.21|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 321670 (314K) [text/plain]
Saving to: `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm'
100%[======================================>] 321,670 367K/s in
0.9s
2009-05-08 14:46:40 (367 KB/s) -
`gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm' saved [321670/321670]
so... 'works for me!' ??
8 * * *
9 * * *
10 * * *
11 * * *
12 * * *
13 * * *
14 * * *
--
Matt Domsch
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
-----Original Message-----
From: Raj Ramamoorthy [mailto:rramamoo@redhat.com]
Sent: Fri 5/8/2009 8:10 AM
To: Chris Morrow
Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org; Domsch, Matt
Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
It failed from my hotel as well (outside Red Hat network).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raj Ramamoorthy" <rramamoo(a)redhat.com>
To: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org, "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 8:09:08 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:7E:13:4A:68
inet addr:10.17.14.64 Bcast:10.17.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::224:7eff:fe13:4a68/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:1112 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:1081 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
RX bytes:663504 (647.9 KiB) TX bytes:177423 (173.2 KiB)
Memory:fc000000-fc020000
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 12:22:10 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
which ip address I wonder is the user using? v4/v6? which?
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
> morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds for me at home on
Time Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red Hat.
>
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653
>
> Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com) 2009-05-07 10:59:53
EDT (-) [reply]
>
> Description of problem:
>
> Downloading Packages:
>
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...:
> [Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is unreachable')>
>
>
> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
> Fedora 10 x86_64
>
> How reproducible:
> Everytime since last few days
>
> Steps to Reproduce:
> 1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10.
> 2.
> 3.
>
> Actual results:
> yum uses mirror site to update for all packages
>
> Expected results:
> yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its available. We
> do not expect it to be down for too long.
>
> Additional info:
> My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on Lenovo
> laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so far.
>
>
>
> --
> Matt Domsch
> Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
> linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
>
>
>
>
10:29 a.m.
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Raj Ramamoorthy wrote:
[root@rramamoo rramamoo]# tcptraceroute fedora.secsup.org
Selected device eth0, address 10.17.14.64, port 42624 for outgoing packets
Tracing the path to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21) on TCP port 80 (http), 30 hops max
1 10.17.14.254 0.704 ms 0.287 ms 0.652 ms
2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 1.237 ms 1.215 ms 1.052 ms
3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 1.338 ms 1.446 ms 1.296 ms
4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 1.315 ms 1.443 ms 1.454 ms
5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 62.352 ms 20.014 ms 20.224 ms
6 500.ATM4-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.137) 20.511 ms 22.391 ms 19.830 ms
7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.590 ms 30.110 ms 20.724 ms
8 * * *
9 208.209.50.21 [open] 20.334 ms 20.514 ms 22.031 ms
great, does wget work for you? I can test from a bunch of other places,
but I suspect it's going to work for me from everywhere I look...
pls try your download again.
-Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 9:47:35 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: RE: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
> [rramamoo@rramamoo ~]$ traceroute fedora.secsup.org
> traceroute to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
> 1 unused (10.17.14.254) 1.987 ms 2.170 ms 2.127 ms
> 2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 2.386 ms 2.331 ms 2.279 ms
> 3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 2.204 ms 2.437 ms 2.392 ms
> 4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 2.345 ms 2.539 ms 2.801 ms
> 5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 20.222 ms 20.180 ms 20.132 ms
> 6 500.ATM7-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.145) 20.026 ms 20.045 ms 20.659 ms
> 7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.618 ms 20.915 ms 20.877 ms
that's a firewall, traceroute/ping are rarely your friend for finding
end-system state... tcptraceroute though might help here.
on the other hand (from a non-701 connected host):
[morrowc@usa1 ~]$ wget
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
--2009-05-08 14:46:38--
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
Resolving fedora.secsup.org... 208.209.50.21,
2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1114, 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1111,
...
Connecting to fedora.secsup.org|208.209.50.21|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 321670 (314K) [text/plain]
Saving to: `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm'
100%[======================================>] 321,670 367K/s in
0.9s
2009-05-08 14:46:40 (367 KB/s) -
`gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm' saved [321670/321670]
so... 'works for me!' ??
> 8 * * *
> 9 * * *
> 10 * * *
> 11 * * *
> 12 * * *
> 13 * * *
> 14 * * *
>
> --
> Matt Domsch
> Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
> linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raj Ramamoorthy [mailto:rramamoo@redhat.com]
> Sent: Fri 5/8/2009 8:10 AM
> To: Chris Morrow
> Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org; Domsch, Matt
> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>
> It failed from my hotel as well (outside Red Hat network).
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Raj Ramamoorthy" <rramamoo(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
> Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org, "Matt Domsch"
<Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 8:09:08 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:7E:13:4A:68
> inet addr:10.17.14.64 Bcast:10.17.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> inet6 addr: fe80::224:7eff:fe13:4a68/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:1112 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:1081 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> RX bytes:663504 (647.9 KiB) TX bytes:177423 (173.2 KiB)
> Memory:fc000000-fc020000
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
> To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
> Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 12:22:10 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>
> which ip address I wonder is the user using? v4/v6? which?
>
> On Thu, 7 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
>
>> morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds for me at
home on Time Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red Hat.
>>
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653
>>
>> Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com) 2009-05-07
10:59:53 EDT (-) [reply]
>>
>> Description of problem:
>>
>> Downloading Packages:
>>
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...:
>> [Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is unreachable')>
>>
>>
>> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
>> Fedora 10 x86_64
>>
>> How reproducible:
>> Everytime since last few days
>>
>> Steps to Reproduce:
>> 1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10.
>> 2.
>> 3.
>>
>> Actual results:
>> yum uses mirror site to update for all packages
>>
>> Expected results:
>> yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its available. We
>> do not expect it to be down for too long.
>>
>> Additional info:
>> My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on Lenovo
>> laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so far.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matt Domsch
>> Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
>> linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
10:32 a.m.
Yes. wget worked.
[rramamoo@rramamoo ~]$ wget
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
--2009-05-08 10:31:43--
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
Resolving fedora.secsup.org... 208.209.50.21, 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1112,
2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1114, ...
Connecting to fedora.secsup.org|208.209.50.21|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 321670 (314K) [text/plain]
Saving to: `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm'
100%[=============================================================================================================>]
321,670 1.62M/s in 0.2s
2009-05-08 10:31:44 (1.62 MB/s) - `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm' saved
[321670/321670]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
To: "Raj Ramamoorthy" <rramamoo(a)redhat.com>
Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org, "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 10:29:40 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Raj Ramamoorthy wrote:
[root@rramamoo rramamoo]# tcptraceroute fedora.secsup.org
Selected device eth0, address 10.17.14.64, port 42624 for outgoing packets
Tracing the path to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21) on TCP port 80 (http), 30 hops max
1 10.17.14.254 0.704 ms 0.287 ms 0.652 ms
2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 1.237 ms 1.215 ms 1.052 ms
3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 1.338 ms 1.446 ms 1.296 ms
4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 1.315 ms 1.443 ms 1.454 ms
5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 62.352 ms 20.014 ms 20.224 ms
6 500.ATM4-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.137) 20.511 ms 22.391 ms 19.830 ms
7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.590 ms 30.110 ms 20.724 ms
8 * * *
9 208.209.50.21 [open] 20.334 ms 20.514 ms 22.031 ms
great, does wget work for you? I can test from a bunch of other places,
but I suspect it's going to work for me from everywhere I look...
pls try your download again.
-Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 9:47:35 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: RE: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
> [rramamoo@rramamoo ~]$ traceroute fedora.secsup.org
> traceroute to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
> 1 unused (10.17.14.254) 1.987 ms 2.170 ms 2.127 ms
> 2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 2.386 ms 2.331 ms 2.279 ms
> 3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 2.204 ms 2.437 ms 2.392 ms
> 4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 2.345 ms 2.539 ms 2.801 ms
> 5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 20.222 ms 20.180 ms 20.132 ms
> 6 500.ATM7-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.145) 20.026 ms 20.045 ms 20.659 ms
> 7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.618 ms 20.915 ms 20.877 ms
that's a firewall, traceroute/ping are rarely your friend for finding
end-system state... tcptraceroute though might help here.
on the other hand (from a non-701 connected host):
[morrowc@usa1 ~]$ wget
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
--2009-05-08 14:46:38--
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
Resolving fedora.secsup.org... 208.209.50.21,
2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1114, 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1111,
...
Connecting to fedora.secsup.org|208.209.50.21|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 321670 (314K) [text/plain]
Saving to: `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm'
100%[======================================>] 321,670 367K/s in
0.9s
2009-05-08 14:46:40 (367 KB/s) -
`gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm' saved [321670/321670]
so... 'works for me!' ??
> 8 * * *
> 9 * * *
> 10 * * *
> 11 * * *
> 12 * * *
> 13 * * *
> 14 * * *
>
> --
> Matt Domsch
> Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
> linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raj Ramamoorthy [mailto:rramamoo@redhat.com]
> Sent: Fri 5/8/2009 8:10 AM
> To: Chris Morrow
> Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org; Domsch, Matt
> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>
> It failed from my hotel as well (outside Red Hat network).
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Raj Ramamoorthy" <rramamoo(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
> Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org, "Matt Domsch"
<Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 8:09:08 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>
> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:7E:13:4A:68
> inet addr:10.17.14.64 Bcast:10.17.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
> inet6 addr: fe80::224:7eff:fe13:4a68/64 Scope:Link
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
> RX packets:1112 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:1081 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
> RX bytes:663504 (647.9 KiB) TX bytes:177423 (173.2 KiB)
> Memory:fc000000-fc020000
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
> To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
> Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 12:22:10 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>
> which ip address I wonder is the user using? v4/v6? which?
>
> On Thu, 7 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
>
>> morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds for me at
home on Time Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red Hat.
>>
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653
>>
>> Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com) 2009-05-07
10:59:53 EDT (-) [reply]
>>
>> Description of problem:
>>
>> Downloading Packages:
>>
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...:
>> [Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is unreachable')>
>>
>>
>> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
>> Fedora 10 x86_64
>>
>> How reproducible:
>> Everytime since last few days
>>
>> Steps to Reproduce:
>> 1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10.
>> 2.
>> 3.
>>
>> Actual results:
>> yum uses mirror site to update for all packages
>>
>> Expected results:
>> yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its available. We
>> do not expect it to be down for too long.
>>
>> Additional info:
>> My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on Lenovo
>> laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so far.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matt Domsch
>> Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
>> linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
11:08 a.m.
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Raj Ramamoorthy wrote:
Yes. wget worked.
ok, so.. was it NOT wget that you used previously? (oh, yum...) what does
yum use in the background and can you test yum as well?
[rramamoo@rramamoo ~]$ wget
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
--2009-05-08 10:31:43--
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
Resolving fedora.secsup.org... 208.209.50.21, 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1112,
2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1114, ...
Connecting to fedora.secsup.org|208.209.50.21|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 321670 (314K) [text/plain]
Saving to: `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm'
100%[=============================================================================================================>]
321,670 1.62M/s in 0.2s
2009-05-08 10:31:44 (1.62 MB/s) - `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm' saved
[321670/321670]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
To: "Raj Ramamoorthy" <rramamoo(a)redhat.com>
Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org, "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 10:29:40 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Raj Ramamoorthy wrote:
> [root@rramamoo rramamoo]# tcptraceroute fedora.secsup.org
> Selected device eth0, address 10.17.14.64, port 42624 for outgoing packets
> Tracing the path to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21) on TCP port 80 (http), 30 hops
max
> 1 10.17.14.254 0.704 ms 0.287 ms 0.652 ms
> 2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 1.237 ms 1.215 ms 1.052 ms
> 3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 1.338 ms 1.446 ms 1.296 ms
> 4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 1.315 ms 1.443 ms 1.454 ms
> 5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 62.352 ms 20.014 ms 20.224 ms
> 6 500.ATM4-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.137) 20.511 ms 22.391 ms 19.830 ms
> 7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.590 ms 30.110 ms 20.724 ms
> 8 * * *
> 9 208.209.50.21 [open] 20.334 ms 20.514 ms 22.031 ms
great, does wget work for you? I can test from a bunch of other places,
but I suspect it's going to work for me from everywhere I look...
pls try your download again.
-Chris
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
> To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
> Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 9:47:35 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: RE: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>
>
>
> On Fri, 8 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
>
>> [rramamoo@rramamoo ~]$ traceroute fedora.secsup.org
>> traceroute to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
>> 1 unused (10.17.14.254) 1.987 ms 2.170 ms 2.127 ms
>> 2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 2.386 ms 2.331 ms 2.279
ms
>> 3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 2.204 ms 2.437 ms 2.392 ms
>> 4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 2.345 ms 2.539 ms 2.801 ms
>> 5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 20.222 ms 20.180 ms 20.132
ms
>> 6 500.ATM7-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.145) 20.026 ms 20.045 ms 20.659
ms
>> 7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.618 ms 20.915 ms 20.877 ms
>
> that's a firewall, traceroute/ping are rarely your friend for finding
> end-system state... tcptraceroute though might help here.
>
> on the other hand (from a non-701 connected host):
>
> [morrowc@usa1 ~]$ wget
>
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
> --2009-05-08 14:46:38--
>
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
> Resolving fedora.secsup.org... 208.209.50.21,
> 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1114, 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1111,
> ...
> Connecting to fedora.secsup.org|208.209.50.21|:80... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> Length: 321670 (314K) [text/plain]
> Saving to: `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm'
>
> 100%[======================================>] 321,670 367K/s in
> 0.9s
>
> 2009-05-08 14:46:40 (367 KB/s) -
> `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm' saved [321670/321670]
>
>
> so... 'works for me!' ??
>
>> 8 * * *
>> 9 * * *
>> 10 * * *
>> 11 * * *
>> 12 * * *
>> 13 * * *
>> 14 * * *
>>
>> --
>> Matt Domsch
>> Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
>> linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Raj Ramamoorthy [mailto:rramamoo@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Fri 5/8/2009 8:10 AM
>> To: Chris Morrow
>> Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org; Domsch, Matt
>> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>>
>> It failed from my hotel as well (outside Red Hat network).
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Raj Ramamoorthy" <rramamoo(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
>> Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org, "Matt Domsch"
<Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
>> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 8:09:08 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
>> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>>
>> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:7E:13:4A:68
>> inet addr:10.17.14.64 Bcast:10.17.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>> inet6 addr: fe80::224:7eff:fe13:4a68/64 Scope:Link
>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:1112 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>> TX packets:1081 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
>> RX bytes:663504 (647.9 KiB) TX bytes:177423 (173.2 KiB)
>> Memory:fc000000-fc020000
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
>> To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
>> Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org
>> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 12:22:10 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
>> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>>
>> which ip address I wonder is the user using? v4/v6? which?
>>
>> On Thu, 7 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
>>
>>> morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds for me at
home on Time Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red Hat.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653
>>>
>>> Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com) 2009-05-07
10:59:53 EDT (-) [reply]
>>>
>>> Description of problem:
>>>
>>> Downloading Packages:
>>>
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...:
>>> [Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is
unreachable')>
>>>
>>>
>>> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
>>> Fedora 10 x86_64
>>>
>>> How reproducible:
>>> Everytime since last few days
>>>
>>> Steps to Reproduce:
>>> 1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10.
>>> 2.
>>> 3.
>>>
>>> Actual results:
>>> yum uses mirror site to update for all packages
>>>
>>> Expected results:
>>> yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its available.
We
>>> do not expect it to be down for too long.
>>>
>>> Additional info:
>>> My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on Lenovo
>>> laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so far.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matt Domsch
>>> Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
>>> linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
5:39 a.m.
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 04:08:52PM +0000, Chris Morrow wrote:
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Raj Ramamoorthy wrote:
> Yes. wget worked.
ok, so.. was it NOT wget that you used previously? (oh, yum...) what does
yum use in the background and can you test yum as well?
Try "urlgrabber" instead of wget; that should use the same code yum uses.
Adrian
> [rramamoo@rramamoo ~]$ wget
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
> --2009-05-08 10:31:43--
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
> Resolving fedora.secsup.org... 208.209.50.21, 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1112,
2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1114, ...
> Connecting to fedora.secsup.org|208.209.50.21|:80... connected.
> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
> Length: 321670 (314K) [text/plain]
> Saving to: `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm'
>
>
100%[=============================================================================================================>]
321,670 1.62M/s in 0.2s
>
> 2009-05-08 10:31:44 (1.62 MB/s) - `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm'
saved [321670/321670]
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
> To: "Raj Ramamoorthy" <rramamoo(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org, "Matt Domsch"
<Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 10:29:40 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>
>
>
> On Fri, 8 May 2009, Raj Ramamoorthy wrote:
>
>> [root@rramamoo rramamoo]# tcptraceroute fedora.secsup.org
>> Selected device eth0, address 10.17.14.64, port 42624 for outgoing packets
>> Tracing the path to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21) on TCP port 80 (http), 30
hops max
>> 1 10.17.14.254 0.704 ms 0.287 ms 0.652 ms
>> 2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 1.237 ms 1.215 ms 1.052
ms
>> 3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 1.338 ms 1.446 ms 1.296
ms
>> 4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 1.315 ms 1.443 ms 1.454 ms
>> 5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 62.352 ms 20.014 ms 20.224
ms
>> 6 500.ATM4-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.137) 20.511 ms 22.391 ms 19.830
ms
>> 7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.590 ms 30.110 ms 20.724 ms
>> 8 * * *
>> 9 208.209.50.21 [open] 20.334 ms 20.514 ms 22.031 ms
>
> great, does wget work for you? I can test from a bunch of other places,
> but I suspect it's going to work for me from everywhere I look...
>
> pls try your download again.
>
> -Chris
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
>> To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
>> Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org
>> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 9:47:35 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
>> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 8 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
>>
>>> [rramamoo@rramamoo ~]$ traceroute fedora.secsup.org
>>> traceroute to fedora.secsup.org (208.209.50.21), 30 hops max, 60 byte
packets
>>> 1 unused (10.17.14.254) 1.987 ms 2.170 ms 2.127 ms
>>> 2 500.Serial3-9.GW3.ATL1.ALTER.NET (157.130.68.181) 2.386 ms 2.331 ms
2.279 ms
>>> 3 187.at-1-2-0.XR1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.83.110) 2.204 ms 2.437 ms
2.392 ms
>>> 4 0.so-1-0-0.XL1.ATL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.85) 2.345 ms 2.539 ms 2.801
ms
>>> 5 0.so-7-0-0.CL1.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.34.142) 20.222 ms 20.180 ms
20.132 ms
>>> 6 500.ATM7-0.GW5.IAD5.ALTER.NET (152.63.43.145) 20.026 ms 20.045 ms
20.659 ms
>>> 7 xa-gw2.customer.alter.net (157.130.13.70) 20.618 ms 20.915 ms 20.877
ms
>>
>> that's a firewall, traceroute/ping are rarely your friend for finding
>> end-system state... tcptraceroute though might help here.
>>
>> on the other hand (from a non-701 connected host):
>>
>> [morrowc@usa1 ~]$ wget
>>
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
>> --2009-05-08 14:46:38--
>>
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...
>> Resolving fedora.secsup.org... 208.209.50.21,
>> 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1114, 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1111,
>> ...
>> Connecting to fedora.secsup.org|208.209.50.21|:80... connected.
>> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
>> Length: 321670 (314K) [text/plain]
>> Saving to: `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm'
>>
>> 100%[======================================>] 321,670 367K/s in
>> 0.9s
>>
>> 2009-05-08 14:46:40 (367 KB/s) -
>> `gstreamer-python-0.10.12-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm' saved [321670/321670]
>>
>>
>> so... 'works for me!' ??
>>
>>> 8 * * *
>>> 9 * * *
>>> 10 * * *
>>> 11 * * *
>>> 12 * * *
>>> 13 * * *
>>> 14 * * *
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matt Domsch
>>> Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
>>> linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Raj Ramamoorthy [mailto:rramamoo@redhat.com]
>>> Sent: Fri 5/8/2009 8:10 AM
>>> To: Chris Morrow
>>> Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org; Domsch, Matt
>>> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>>>
>>> It failed from my hotel as well (outside Red Hat network).
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Raj Ramamoorthy" <rramamoo(a)redhat.com>
>>> To: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
>>> Cc: mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org, "Matt Domsch"
<Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 8:09:08 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
>>> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>>>
>>> eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:7E:13:4A:68
>>> inet addr:10.17.14.64 Bcast:10.17.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
>>> inet6 addr: fe80::224:7eff:fe13:4a68/64 Scope:Link
>>> UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>>> RX packets:1112 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>> TX packets:1081 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
>>> RX bytes:663504 (647.9 KiB) TX bytes:177423 (173.2 KiB)
>>> Memory:fc000000-fc020000
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
>>> To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
>>> Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org
>>> Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 12:22:10 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
>>> Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
>>>
>>> which ip address I wonder is the user using? v4/v6? which?
>>>
>>> On Thu, 7 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds for
me at home on Time Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red Hat.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653
>>>>
>>>> Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com)
2009-05-07 10:59:53 EDT (-) [reply]
>>>>
>>>> Description of problem:
>>>>
>>>> Downloading Packages:
>>>>
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...:
>>>> [Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is
unreachable')>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
>>>> Fedora 10 x86_64
>>>>
>>>> How reproducible:
>>>> Everytime since last few days
>>>>
>>>> Steps to Reproduce:
>>>> 1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10.
>>>> 2.
>>>> 3.
>>>>
>>>> Actual results:
>>>> yum uses mirror site to update for all packages
>>>>
>>>> Expected results:
>>>> yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its
available. We
>>>> do not expect it to be down for too long.
>>>>
>>>> Additional info:
>>>> My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on
Lenovo
>>>> laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so
far.
9:46 a.m.
On Fri, 8 May 2009, Raj Ramamoorthy wrote:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:7E:13:4A:68
inet addr:10.17.14.64 Bcast:10.17.14.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::224:7eff:fe13:4a68/64 Scope:Link
sorry, I meant: "What ip address were you trying to reach?" to which I'd
expect something like: 208.209.50.21 or 2600:803:420:2:b00b:b00b:1234:1114
... sadly I think the v6 is actually broken which was the genesis of my
question.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Morrow" <morrowc(a)ops-netman.net>
To: "Matt Domsch" <Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com>
Cc: rramamoo(a)redhat.com, mirror-admin(a)fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, May 8, 2009 12:22:10 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: secsup.org Fedora mirror problem report
which ip address I wonder is the user using? v4/v6? which?
On Thu, 7 May 2009, Matt_Domsch(a)Dell.com wrote:
> morrowc, any chance this is a known problem? The download succeeds for me at home on
Time Warner, but apparently is failing for this user who works at Red Hat.
>
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499653
>
> Description From Rajagopal Ramamoorthy (rramamoo(a)redhat.com) 2009-05-07 10:59:53
EDT (-) [reply]
>
> Description of problem:
>
> Downloading Packages:
>
http://fedora.secsup.org/linux/releases/10/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/...:
> [Errno 4] IOError: <urlopen error (101, 'Network is unreachable')>
>
>
> Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
> Fedora 10 x86_64
>
> How reproducible:
> Everytime since last few days
>
> Steps to Reproduce:
> 1. Just type yum update in 64bit Fedora 10.
> 2.
> 3.
>
> Actual results:
> yum uses mirror site to update for all packages
>
> Expected results:
> yum should have got to the first site it has in the list if its available. We
> do not expect it to be down for too long.
>
> Additional info:
> My email id rramamoo(a)redhat.com and I am running Fedora 10 x86_64 on Lenovo
> laptop ThinkPad T500. I get this error from all networks I have used so far.
>
>
>
> --
> Matt Domsch
> Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO
> linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
>
>
>
>
5459
days inactive
5460
days old
mirror-admin@lists.fedoraproject.org
11 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Adrian Reber -
Chris Morrow -
Matt Domsch -
Raj Ramamoorthy