music March 2010

music@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
10 discussions

Re: [Fedora Update] [old_testing] rakarrack-0.2.0-5.fc8 / fc9
by Development discussions related to Fedora 27 Jan '26

27 Jan '26

updates(a)fedoraproject.org wrote: > The update for rakarrack-0.2.0-5.fc8 has been in 'testing' status for over 2 weeks. .. > ================================================================================ > rakarrack-0.2.0-5.fc8 > ================================================================================ > Update ID: FEDORA-2008-9033 > Release: Fedora 8 > Status: testing > Type: newpackage > Karma: 0 > Bugs: 455953 - Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack > : for guitar > Notes: Initial build of rakarrack for fedora > Submitter: dtimms > Submitted: 2008-10-20 21:46:29 > Comments: dtimms - 2008-10-20 21:46:32 (karma 0) > This update has been submitted for testing > bodhi - 2008-10-23 16:35:19 (karma 0) > This update has been pushed to testing > > http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-9033 Hi fedora-music lovers, I would be keen for some feedback on whether rakarrack that is now in fedora testing works for you ? To fully test you'll need a guitar and pickup plugged into your soundcard, but even a go/nogo on whether it starts would be helpful. Where I developed the package, it works OK, but another older AMD machine, it fails during startup. This will help me to decide whether to push it to the F8,F9 updates repos. DaveT.

6 11

whysynth doesn't work
by Florin Andrei 06 Jan '26

06 Jan '26

I got whysynth-dssi-20060122-7.src.rpm from here: http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/ I rebuilt it on FC6 without problems. The thing is, the GUI doesn't show up. The program appears to be working, I see the outputs being automatically routed in qjackctl, but there's no GUI anywhere! ############################################### $ jack-dssi-host whysynth.so jack-dssi-host: Warning: DSSI path not set jack-dssi-host: Defaulting to "/usr/local/lib/dssi:/usr/lib/dssi:/home/florin/.dssi" jack-dssi-host: OSC URL is: osc.udp://rivendell.home.local:15040/dssi/whysynth/WhySynth/chan00 host: Ready WhySynth_gtk starting (pid 4305)... ############################################### -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/

6 16

QMidiCtl and QMidiNet (was Re: [PlanetCCRMA] Pd + PulseAudio?)
by Niels Mayer 25 Mar '10

25 Mar '10

Rui's note on qjackctl prompted me to look at http://www.rncbc.org and then http://www.rncbc.org/drupal/node/191 which lead to http://qmidictl.sourceforge.net/ and http://qmidinet.sourceforge.net/ ... Both of these apps look awesome. Any chance these can be made available through PlanetCCRMA or even better, through fedora which already carries up-to-date versions of qtractor. Also, one issue I've found w/ controllers in general is that there is a need for a simple scripting language, or a comprehensive set of "built-in special functions" to handle "state" and "computation" in midi controllers. Do qmidictl or qmidinet have any solutions for this? One quick example I ran into recently. I've setup a very useful remote control to a TC Electronics Finalizer. One of the features it has is a MIDI-controlled "fader" (e.g. for doing smooth fadeouts/fadeins). I've got that mapped to a 100MM slider on a behringer controller and it's SWEET. But also, it's linear. What I need is to map the midi controllers 0-127 to a logarithmic curve so as to match human loudness perception. This doesn't seem possible in qmidiroute... (?) What tools would allow this, or any other "computed" mapping to be done? (see also see http://old.nabble.com/using-qmidiroute-for-midi-device-control....-ts279631… ) Is there an easy way to add scripting languages to Qt apps? (something like 'Guile' would be nice). Niels http://nielsmayer.com PS: thanks to http://www.rncbc.org/drupal/node/183 , I will also be taking a look at qtractor-0.4.5-1.fc12.x86_64 which i've installed, but not yet explored ( rosegarden4-10.02.1-1.fc12.x86_64 works well for me so far).

2 2

new packages in Fedora updates-testing (2010-03-13)
by Orcan Ogetbil 13 Mar '10

13 Mar '10

Please give a day or two until it gets pushed and the mirrors are populated. jconvolver-0.8.6: F-11: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jconvolver-0.8.6-1.fc11 F-12: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jconvolver-0.8.6-1.fc12 F-13: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jconvolver-0.8.6-1.fc13 To give positive or negative karma, please visit the above pages. The extra reverbs are still excluded from the package since the upstream didn't respond to our queries about the license. These reverbs can be downloaded from: http://www.kokkinizita.net/linuxaudio/downloads/index.html Cheers, Orcan

1 0

new packages in Fedora updates-testing (2010-03-12)
by Orcan Ogetbil 12 Mar '10

12 Mar '10

I submitted qjackctl-0.3.6 to updates-testing in Fedora. Please give a day or two until it gets pushed and the mirrors are populated. Te give positive or negative karma, please visit: F-11: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qjackctl-0.3.6-1.fc11 F-12: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qjackctl-0.3.6-1.fc12 F-13: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qjackctl-0.3.6-1.fc13 If you are impatient, the above pages also contain a link from where you can manually download the RPM's for your architecture. Cheers, Orcan

1 0

Re: [Fedora-music-list] [PlanetCCRMA] about Fedora updates
by Orcan Ogetbil 09 Mar '10

09 Mar '10

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 3:34 AM, Luis Garrido wrote: >> The main reason that I am writing is to ask you about your take on our >> update strategy in Fedora. Currently, there is a heated discussion in >> Fedora-devel mailing list about update policies. It might happen that >> our updates policy might change to a more conservative one. > > I thought Fedora filled RedHat's niche for "keeping up with the new > features even if stability suffers a bit" distributions. What is "more > conservative", exactly? > There are mixed opinions. Some say security and bugfixes but no enhancement updates. Some even go up to pushing security fixes only. Here is a proposal that will be discussed in tomorrow's steering committee meeting: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-March/132730.html No conclusion has been reached for the time being. > A mature-ish Fedora (i.e., one version below the the current one but > still on maintenance, between 6- and 12-months old) is usually a good > trade-off. You will always have to deal with some problematic stuff or > another, putting down small fires, but that's the blood in the > bleeding edge, people should be aware of that when they choose this > kind of distro. If you value rock-solid stability over new features go > RHEL or CentOS (which I do for my servers.) > :) These were the main arguments that some more "adventurous" package maintainers like me came up with. I just wanted to hear you folks' opinions, as that's what matters for me most. Orcan

2 1

Re: [Fedora-music-list] [PlanetCCRMA] about Fedora updates
by Fernando Lopez-Lezcano 09 Mar '10

09 Mar '10

On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 22:39 -0800, Niels Mayer wrote: > For example, there should be a well supported option for "prosumer" > and "pro" audio/video use of Linux using Jack and netjack as a > replacement for pulseaudio. These would need to be supported across > the board by other apps in fedora/gnome/kde s.t. users wouldn't need > to manually set gstreamer properties in gconf, or do other gyrations I > described earlier > in: http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.audio.planetccrma.general/9485 . One suggestion for using Jack as a replacement to pulseaudio was made here: http://pdavila.homelinux.org:8080/blog/?p=369 ... This comes up every once in a while in the jack* lists (and/or lac). So far no one (AFAIK) has gone beyond saying that it is the way it should be and that that would solve all problems. When somebody actually starts working the way down that path he/she will realize that it is not that simple (this is not to say that it should not be done or could not be done). Currently Jack2 (fc12+) plays nice with Pulseaudio and can get the sound card on startup and release it when exiting. And the Pulseaudio connection to Jack did work on limited tests I did. So you can start Jack, load the appropriate Pulseaudio plugin and redirect all PA streams to play through Jack. I experimented with that briefly when writing the perl script I used for Jack/PA interaction in fc11 when the PA vs. Jack interaction was still buggy. It was possible to start Jack and get an application that was playing on PA to keep playing transparently through Jack. So, the building blocks are already there, I think. Still, there are many reasons why it is not possible or desirable to make Jack a "system service" that starts when the computer boots. It is not designed to do that (security is one of the main problems). > Such an option would also make Fedora even more "the distro to have" > for doing prosumer and pro music and video on Linux, especially with > Fedora's strong support for infrastructure like qjackctl and patchage, > audio tools like rosegarden or ardour, and video tools including > qjadeo , kino, kdenlive etc. -- Fernando

1 0

Re: [Fedora-music-list] [PlanetCCRMA] about Fedora updates
by Orcan Ogetbil 09 Mar '10

09 Mar '10

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:39 AM, Niels Mayer wrote: > > Orcan -- Please continue doing what you're doing! > I think what would help is your continuing to announce new packages, and our > willingness to invest enough time to properly test functionality in new > releases. Thanks Niels, Yes I admit I have not been so good with announcements of new update candidates. I will try harder. Best, Orcan

1 0

about Fedora updates
by Orcan Ogetbil 08 Mar '10

08 Mar '10

Hi folks, I just submitted rosegarden-10.02 to stable in Fedora since nobody yelled at me, and those who commented didn't complain. The main reason that I am writing is to ask you about your take on our update strategy in Fedora. Currently, there is a heated discussion in Fedora-devel mailing list about update policies. It might happen that our updates policy might change to a more conservative one. Are you happy with the current situation? What I do is, I typically push an update to updates-testing, leave it there for 2 weeks minimum (sometimes more). If no complaints, push it to stable updates repo. Do you think that we are pushing updates too frequently? I like to keep all of us up to date. We get a decently low number of bug reports. Do you have a stability problem with this policy? I can stop doing non-critical updates in stable Fedora releases if there is an issue. I just wanted to hear your opinion. Thanks, Orcan

1 0

fedora 12, Pulseaudio and Jack
by Jeff Sandys 08 Mar '10

08 Mar '10

In Fedora 12 with Planet CCRMA Jack Audio Connection Kit, does starting jack with qjackctl suspend pulseaudio? If not, how can I add pulseaudio suspend (and resume) to qjackctl? How can I tell if pulseaudio is running, is there a terminal command for pulseaudio status? I have searched through the jackaudio.org, pulseaudio.org, qjackctl.sourceforge.net and other sites, and didn't find an obvious answer. http://fedorasolved.org/Members/fenris02/pulseaudio-fixes-and-workaroundshas some info but not about jack. Thanks, Jeff Sandys

3 4

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

music March 2010