updates(a)fedoraproject.org wrote:
> The update for rakarrack-0.2.0-5.fc8 has been in 'testing' status for over 2 weeks.
..
> ================================================================================
> rakarrack-0.2.0-5.fc8
> ================================================================================
> Update ID: FEDORA-2008-9033
> Release: Fedora 8
> Status: testing
> Type: newpackage
> Karma: 0
> Bugs: 455953 - Review Request: rakarrack - Audio effects processing rack
> : for guitar
> Notes: Initial build of rakarrack for fedora
> Submitter: dtimms
> Submitted: 2008-10-20 21:46:29
> Comments: dtimms - 2008-10-20 21:46:32 (karma 0)
> This update has been submitted for testing
> bodhi - 2008-10-23 16:35:19 (karma 0)
> This update has been pushed to testing
>
> http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-9033
Hi fedora-music lovers,
I would be keen for some feedback on whether rakarrack that is now in
fedora testing works for you ?
To fully test you'll need a guitar and pickup plugged into your
soundcard, but even a go/nogo on whether it starts would be helpful.
Where I developed the package, it works OK, but another older AMD
machine, it fails during startup. This will help me to decide whether to
push it to the F8,F9 updates repos.
DaveT.
I got whysynth-dssi-20060122-7.src.rpm from here:
http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/
I rebuilt it on FC6 without problems. The thing is, the GUI doesn't show
up. The program appears to be working, I see the outputs being
automatically routed in qjackctl, but there's no GUI anywhere!
###############################################
$ jack-dssi-host whysynth.so
jack-dssi-host: Warning: DSSI path not set
jack-dssi-host: Defaulting to
"/usr/local/lib/dssi:/usr/lib/dssi:/home/florin/.dssi"
jack-dssi-host: OSC URL is:
osc.udp://rivendell.home.local:15040/dssi/whysynth/WhySynth/chan00
host: Ready
WhySynth_gtk starting (pid 4305)...
###############################################
--
Florin Andrei
http://florin.myip.org/
Hi Gemi / comaintainers of audacity,
I am about to request cvs epel branches (5,6) for audacity.
The intent would be to build current 1.3.12 beta for EL-6, and if
positive feedback also build for EL-5 testing (in case it has the needed
requirements).
Let me know if this will cause issues etc ?
Also 1.3.12 beta has been built for rawhide and F13 (awaiting testing push):
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/community/?_csrf_token=6c58fe00609f78fbdd34…
If you are an audacity user please help by testing this build and
reporting problems in the update as soon as you can.
David Timms.
The Fedora version has annoying bugs that are fixed in the current svn
(QjackCtl: 0.3.6.30). Any chance of a bugfix release picking up these
important fixes:
(1) Fixed: Patchbay connections made from a single midi subdevice to
different midi port's subdevices end up connecting to all subdevices
between ports. Requiriung hand-editing each time a patchbay is
activated where this bug is occurring.
(2) Fixed: Infinite loop and warning-dialog-lockout on jackd failure:
http://old.nabble.com/Re:-qjackctl---server-name-p28893271.html
> Fons said:
> There is still the (older but not very old) problem of
> qjackctl going into and endless loop when it somehow
> fails to start jackd. The only solution in that case is
> to terminate it. Which can be a shooting game as windows
> keep popping up, and you have to close them all before
> a close on the main window is accepted.
(3) Fixed: You can now start multiple qjackctl's each talking to their
own soundcard
( http://old.nabble.com/Re:-qjackctl---server-name-p28828296.html )
e.g.
qjackctl --server-name=ICE1724 --preset=ICE1724_48
qjackctl --server-name=M66 --preset=M66-Omni-Studio
Niels
http://nielsmayer.com
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If I install Fedora+CCRMA do I will have problems with my Maotu UltraLite
> firewire soundcard. Is it supported at all???
>
I believe that it is supported with ffado version 2.0rc2+ according to
http://www.ffado.org/?q=release/rc2
So PlanetCCRMA's ffado should support it. Alternatively, an SVN
snapshot of ffado, which will become version 2.1 in the future and
which supports a wider range of hardware, is under review in Fedora.
You might want to grab the SRPM from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456353
and build your own RPMs. It is supposed to have the same API/ABI with
previous versions so we don't expect it to have problems.
Orcan
Hi, I've recently updated rakarrack to 0.4.2-2 for fc12 and rawhide.
While it works well on my F12 system, I would welcome some additional
testing feedback (preferably in bodhi), before pushing it to the more
stable F12 updates:
f12:
yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rakarrack
feedback to:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rakarrack-0.4.2-2.fc12
Since the f13 build had sat in testing, but no comments were made, and I
had no trouble running it over last 2 months, I've pushed the update to
stable.
For rawhide, I don't have a machine to test on at the moment (with
working alsa/pulse analog input), so feel free to provide any feedback
you can about rakarrack.
About rhel5 - anyone prefer the upgrade to not go to the epel5 repo ?
Cheers, David.