I've been spending a lot of time on the #opensourcemusicians channel
talking to Ubuntu Studio users about their kernel and latency times they're
getting. Seems like most of them are using g a stock kernel with the
preemptive option enabled and they are getting great latency results
(2ms)while utilizing the @audio group on their user. I ended up compiling
my own low latency kernel and I haven't had any issues with it yet. If this
is what we are missing for the spin I'd be happy to maintain packaging for
the kernel. I know ccrma has been behind a few kernel releases.
I saw the instructions for adding the real time patch for a tick less
kernel and from what I can tell it wouldn't be hard to get that rolling as
I'm not entirely sure what ccrma does differently with their kernels
compared to other Linux users, and I'm still a bit of a noob so I could be
off base with this, but I would reason that we should be able to just
utilize the same settings to archive similar performance enhancements.
I thought I read that ccrma uses a unique scheduler, but if we could get a
2ms latency time without it, the point may be moot.
does anyone have any objection to a new comps group containing packages
currently present in the Fedora Jam audio spin?
We will be discussing names further within the music creation SIG /
fedora-music mailing list soon, but Audio Production or Music Creation
are two that immediately spring to mind. Suggestions welcome.
I was finally able to figure out what was going on with synthclone.
I've got the rpm built and successful koji builds but I still need review
and a sponsor. I do want to get to a place where I can help out brandon and
others with some of the packaging.