On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 05:40 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:
Ant wrote:
> Transaction Check Error:
> file /usr/share/locale/de_DE/LC_MESSAGES/gtk_ardour.mo conflicts
> between attempted installs of ardour2-2.0-1.fc6.ccrma and
> ardour-0.99.3-8.fc6
[lots deleted]
> file /usr/share/locale/sv_SE/LC_MESSAGES/libardour.mo conflicts
> between attempted installs of ardour2-2.0-1.fc6.ccrma and
> ardour-0.99.3-8.fc6
>
> But thats what the current thread is about, having both versions?
Ugh.. I guess upstream was wrong when they said you can install both
ardour 0.99.3 and ardour 2 in parallel.
Nando, what do you think? One solution would be to drop the .mo files
from the proposed ardour0, have it depend on ardour (2), and hope that
the messages are backwards compatible.
This is something I don't understand, looks like a bug (feature?) in
yum?. I have both installed in fc6. So I erased them and tried:
install both in the same transaction: fails
install ardour, then install ardour2: fine
install ardour2, then install ardour: fine
Argh...
So... install, say, ardour and then go for planetccrma-apps (I'll erase
"ardour" from the meta package later - for now).
-- Fernando