I guess renaming it makes the most sense. Could we put in a request
upstream to see if they have a preference?
On Tue Jan 06 2015 at 10:15:21 AM Fernando Lopez-Lezcano <
On 01/06/2015 08:07 AM, Janina Sajka wrote:
Hi Janina, thanks for the report!
> I upgraded one of my machines from Fedora 20 to 21 the other day and ran
> into the following error:
> Transaction check error:
> file /usr/bin/lscp from install of nilfs-utils-2.2.0-3.fc21.x86_64
> conflicts with file from package
> file /usr/share/man/man1/lscp.1.gz from install of
> nilfs-utils-2.2.0-3.fc21.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
> I resolved the conflict by removing nilfs-utils, but there's clearly a
> bug here somewhere. I'm unclear where to report it, though.
Apparently the existing lscp lists NILFS2 checkpoints. Linuxsampler
chose to name their new LSCP shell "lscp" and that is why there is a
conflict (I have not tried it, I presume it is a command line controller
of linuxsampler using the LSCP protocol).
I don't know what to do exactly. I could rename the linuxsampler "lscp"
to something else, for example "linuxsampler-lscp". Probably the only
reasonable option (or I could just leave the conflict there).
What do others on the list think?
music mailing list