notting(a)redhat.com said:
Anthony Green (green(a)redhat.com) said:
> One of the suggestions was to use the official project spelling of
> "MusE" for the package name. Do the Extras packaging guidelines allow
> this (having both MusE and muse package)?
Let's please not go that route... even though I can't find anything in the
guidelines that mention this case (yet...)
Some combination of CVS, bugzilla, and/or the buildsystem I suspect
would
break.
Yes, and for the end user it might get quite confusing...
Frankly, I'd rename the emacs thing emacs-muse, but that's
just me. :)
Not just you. If RPM can handle this, maybe an emacs-muse package that
Provides muse for a short while... I think spot wanted to explicitly mention
emacs/xemacs in the addon packages section.
Cheers,
Christian