[Fwd: [Bug 440736] FTBFS qsynth-0.2.5-7.fc9]

[Fernando Lopez-Lezcano]

Would it be possible for someone to pick this up and follow through? I'm
completely off the loop of the new compiling process in Fedora and I
just came back from teaching in Berlin for 5 months, my schedule is
completely completely full....

Thanks!
-- Fernando


-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: bugzilla(a)redhat.com
To: nando(a)ccrma.Stanford.EDU
Subject: [Bug 440736] FTBFS qsynth-0.2.5-7.fc9
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:26:22 -0400

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440736


--- Comment #7 from FTBFS <ftbfs(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;  2008-09-05 12:26:22 EDT ---
This package has Failed to Build From Source for many months.  Per
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS, this package is now proposed for
removal from the distribution.  Please address this FTBFS bug
immediately, or this package will be removed from the distribution
within the next few weeks.

Thank you for your continued contributions to Fedora, and your
commitment to ensuring Fedora packages remain buildable from source
code.

[Michel Salim]

I can take a look at it later today.

Cheers,

-- 
Michel

On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
<nando(a)ccrma.stanford.edu&gt; wrote:
>  Would it be possible for someone to pick this up and follow through?
> I'm
>  completely off the loop of the new compiling process in Fedora and I
>  just came back from teaching in Berlin for 5 months, my schedule is
>  completely completely full....
>
>  Thanks!
>  -- Fernando
>
>
>  -------- Forwarded Message --------
>  From: bugzilla(a)redhat.com
>  To: nando(a)ccrma.Stanford.EDU
>  Subject: [Bug 440736] FTBFS qsynth-0.2.5-7.fc9
>  Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 12:26:22 -0400
>
>  Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
>  comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
>
>
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440736
>
>
>  --- Comment #7 from FTBFS <ftbfs(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;  2008-09-05 12:26:22 EDT ---
>  This package has Failed to Build From Source for many months.  Per
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS, this package is now proposed for
>  removal from the distribution.  Please address this FTBFS bug
>  immediately, or this package will be removed from the distribution
>  within the next few weeks.
>
>  Thank you for your continued contributions to Fedora, and your
>  commitment to ensuring Fedora packages remain buildable from source
>  code.
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Fedora-music-list mailing list
>  Fedora-music-list(a)redhat.com
>  http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list
>  


-- 
Michel Salim
http://hircus.jaiku.com/

[Hans de Goede]

Michel Salim wrote:
>  I can take a look at it later today.
>  
Good,

Let me know if you can't solve it then I'll take a look.

Regards,

Hans

[Michel Salim]

On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl&gt; wrote:
>  Michel Salim wrote:
> >
> > I can take a look at it later today.
> >
>
>  Good,
>
>  Let me know if you can't solve it then I'll take a look.
>  
I've pushed the build to the update system: the actual build failure
is not complicated (qt -> qt3 renaming), but as the qt4-based 0.3.3
release is out, I figured updating to it instead would reduce the
number of Qt3 applications shipped.

Works on F10 just fine (modulo the currently-broken Qt/KDE anti-aliasing, ugh)

Regards,

-- 
Michel Salim
http://hircus.jaiku.com/

[Fernando Lopez-Lezcano]

On Sat, 2008-09-06 at 09:11 -0400, Michel Salim wrote:
>  On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Hans de Goede
> <j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl&gt; wrote:
>  > Michel Salim wrote:
>  >>
>  >> I can take a look at it later today.
>  >>
>  >
>  > Good,
>  >
>  > Let me know if you can't solve it then I'll take a look.
>  >
>  I've pushed the build to the update system: the actual build failure
>  is not complicated (qt -> qt3 renaming), but as the qt4-based 0.3.3
>  release is out, I figured updating to it instead would reduce the
>  number of Qt3 applications shipped.
>  
>  Works on F10 just fine (modulo the currently-broken Qt/KDE anti-aliasing, ugh) 
Thank you very much for the fast response! And for the upgrade to
0.3.3...

-- Fernando