On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Niels Mayer wrote:
> I noticed that bristol-0.40.7-7 updated due to the following security
> update. What got me curious is what kind of security issue could
> running bristol possibly pose?? -- none on it's own, but another rogue
> package could exploit this issue ...
for whatever its worth, ardour had the same issue.
there's a more elegant fix than the one shown in that bug report
though. the general form is:
Shorter? Yes. More elegant? That's debatable since it is a confusing syntax.
For the ardour package in Fedora, I used your fix though, since you
are the upstream.