-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hello:
I want to confirm whether the JACK package that made it into the Fedora 14 freeze is based on jack1 or jack2.
I also want to confirm whether Qtractor will be included in the Fedora 14 repository.
Thank you, Christopher.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Christopher Antila wrote:
Hello:
Hello,
I want to confirm whether the JACK package that made it into the Fedora 14 freeze is based on jack1 or jack2.
Jack2. 100% certainly.
I also want to confirm whether Qtractor will be included in the Fedora 14 repository.
Nobody can be sure about this. Qtractor is provided by RPMFusion because it has some libmad dependency. It can only get in Fedora if it gets compiled without libmad support. If someone packages Qtractor without libmad support and submits it to Fedora, and it gets accepted before Fedora 14 is released, then it will be included in the Fedora 14 repository. Otherwise it won't be included in the Fedora 14 repository.
If you want me to make a guess, it will be in the Fedora 14 repository by 3% chance. However it will be in the RPMFusion 14 repository for sure.
Orcan
On 08/02/2010 03:02 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Christopher Antila wrote:
Hello:
Hello,
I want to confirm whether the JACK package that made it into the Fedora 14 freeze is based on jack1 or jack2.
Jack2. 100% certainly.
Great news!
I also want to confirm whether Qtractor will be included in the Fedora 14 repository.
Nobody can be sure about this. Qtractor is provided by RPMFusion because it has some libmad dependency. It can only get in Fedora if it gets compiled without libmad support. If someone packages Qtractor without libmad support and submits it to Fedora, and it gets accepted before Fedora 14 is released, then it will be included in the Fedora 14 repository. Otherwise it won't be included in the Fedora 14 repository.
If you want me to make a guess, it will be in the Fedora 14 repository by 3% chance. However it will be in the RPMFusion 14 repository for sure.
Orcan
Is it better to use the version from RPMFusion or from Planet CCRMA? Does it make a difference at all?
Thank you for the fast response!
Christopher
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Christopher Antila wrote:
On 08/02/2010 03:02 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Christopher Antila wrote:
I also want to confirm whether Qtractor will be included in the Fedora 14 repository.
Nobody can be sure about this. Qtractor is provided by RPMFusion because it has some libmad dependency. It can only get in Fedora if it gets compiled without libmad support. If someone packages Qtractor without libmad support and submits it to Fedora, and it gets accepted before Fedora 14 is released, then it will be included in the Fedora 14 repository. Otherwise it won't be included in the Fedora 14 repository.
If you want me to make a guess, it will be in the Fedora 14 repository by 3% chance. However it will be in the RPMFusion 14 repository for sure.
Orcan
Is it better to use the version from RPMFusion or from Planet CCRMA? Does it make a difference at all?
"Better" is a very subjective term. So my answer cannot be precise.
Some consider the latest bleeding edge software to be better, others prefer stability. Moreover, we can't predict which packaged versions will have better behavior than others. If same versions are packaged in both repos, there shouldn't be much of a difference. Otherwise, there will be a difference, but the difference can be in any direction.
Orcan
traverso has the same problem?
2010/8/2 Orcan Ogetbil oget.fedora@gmail.com:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Christopher Antila wrote:
On 08/02/2010 03:02 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Christopher Antila wrote:
I also want to confirm whether Qtractor will be included in the Fedora 14 repository.
Nobody can be sure about this. Qtractor is provided by RPMFusion because it has some libmad dependency. It can only get in Fedora if it gets compiled without libmad support. If someone packages Qtractor without libmad support and submits it to Fedora, and it gets accepted before Fedora 14 is released, then it will be included in the Fedora 14 repository. Otherwise it won't be included in the Fedora 14 repository.
If you want me to make a guess, it will be in the Fedora 14 repository by 3% chance. However it will be in the RPMFusion 14 repository for sure.
Orcan
Is it better to use the version from RPMFusion or from Planet CCRMA? Does it make a difference at all?
"Better" is a very subjective term. So my answer cannot be precise.
Some consider the latest bleeding edge software to be better, others prefer stability. Moreover, we can't predict which packaged versions will have better behavior than others. If same versions are packaged in both repos, there shouldn't be much of a difference. Otherwise, there will be a difference, but the difference can be in any direction.
Orcan _______________________________________________ music mailing list music@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 11:13:17AM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Christopher Antila wrote:
On 08/02/2010 03:02 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: Is it better to use the version from RPMFusion or from Planet CCRMA? Does it make a difference at all?
"Better" is a very subjective term. So my answer cannot be precise.
Some consider the latest bleeding edge software to be better, others prefer stability. Moreover, we can't predict which packaged versions will have better behavior than others. If same versions are packaged in both repos, there shouldn't be much of a difference. Otherwise, there will be a difference, but the difference can be in any direction.
There is a danger of problems having more than one repo enabled that have identical packages. One consideration on which to choose, can you get the external repositories needed to a single source to avoid duplicates and dependency weirdness?
- Karsten
-
Bernardo Barros -
Christopher Antila -
Karsten Wade -
Orcan Ogetbil