Hi all,
I have recently gone through the pain of relocating countries, setting up new workstations etc. and would love to have all the packages I use sitting in Fedora. As a result I've packaged a few things which I use
What is the status of the Fedora Audio SIG? After going through this myself I am keen to resurrect the idea of a Fedora Studio. We could even make it a feature of Fedora 17.
We would probably need to coordinate from planetccrma what desperately needs to be in mainline Fedora and any other packages which are missing. If there is anything you would like packaged which is not let me know.
In the meantime there is a new packages that have hit Fedora 16 (at .least) in the last month or so.
zita-at1 - Fons' auto-tuner zita-rev1 - Reverb from Fons phat - GTK toolkit for audio software, was in planetccrma, depandancy of specimen. New project coming soon to Fedora petri-foo, which replaces/inherits specimen (currently FTBS in planet) clxclient - dependancy of zita*, previously in planetccrma*
I also have a couple of lv2 plugins awaiting review here [1].
Also thinking of packaging Neil, although this will probably need to reside in rpmfusion
regards, Brendan
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&classifica...
FAS: bsjones Freenode: bsjones (not often but will lurk in #fedora-audio, #opensourcemusicians for a bit)
Hi:
One package that I use almost every day is "frescobaldi". It was included until Fedora 15, is unmaintained in f16, and has a new upstream release coming soon. The previous maintainer gave us plenty of notice that he would be orphaning the package, and I thought I would be able to pick it up myself, but it's just not feasible for me in the near future. For my own use, it's easy enough to download the Python sources and run it locally... but to have it back in the official repository would be a definite plus for those of us who can't. It's also in the "Musicians' Guide."
If that doesn't interest you, there's the "supercollider" set of packages, currently available in PlanetCCRMA@Home, that I feel would be great to have in the "real" Fedora repositories.
Maybe we could encourage somebody (a university student) to register for the Fedora Summer Coding program, which would give them three months of dedicated time to, basically, work on an audio spin and nothing else. This would fit better into the "Fedora 18" timeline.
Christopher.
On 10 December 2011 12:13:27 Brendan Jones wrote:
Hi all,
I have recently gone through the pain of relocating countries, setting up new workstations etc. and would love to have all the packages I use sitting in Fedora. As a result I've packaged a few things which I use
What is the status of the Fedora Audio SIG? After going through this myself I am keen to resurrect the idea of a Fedora Studio. We could even make it a feature of Fedora 17.
We would probably need to coordinate from planetccrma what desperately needs to be in mainline Fedora and any other packages which are missing. If there is anything you would like packaged which is not let me know.
In the meantime there is a new packages that have hit Fedora 16 (at .least) in the last month or so.
zita-at1 - Fons' auto-tuner zita-rev1 - Reverb from Fons phat - GTK toolkit for audio software, was in planetccrma, depandancy of specimen. New project coming soon to Fedora petri-foo, which replaces/inherits specimen (currently FTBS in planet) clxclient - dependancy of zita*, previously in planetccrma*
I also have a couple of lv2 plugins awaiting review here [1].
Also thinking of packaging Neil, although this will probably need to reside in rpmfusion
regards, Brendan
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&classifica... n=Fedora&product=Fedora&component=Package%20Review&bug_status=NEW&emailrepo rter1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=brendan.jones.it%40gmail.com
FAS: bsjones Freenode: bsjones (not often but will lurk in #fedora-audio, #opensourcemusicians for a bit)
music mailing list music@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
On 12/10/2011 08:40 PM, Christopher Antila wrote:
Hi:
One package that I use almost every day is "frescobaldi". It was included until Fedora 15, is unmaintained in f16, and has a new upstream release coming soon. The previous maintainer gave us plenty of notice that he would be orphaning the package, and I thought I would be able to pick it up myself, but it's just not feasible for me in the near future. For my own use, it's easy enough to download the Python sources and run it locally... but to have it back in the official repository would be a definite plus for those of us who can't. It's also in the "Musicians' Guide."
If that doesn't interest you, there's the "supercollider" set of packages, currently available in PlanetCCRMA@Home, that I feel would be great to have in the "real" Fedora repositories.
I'll speak to fernando about the supercollider set, as for frescobaldi, I'll unorphan it and put it up for re-review.
BTW Christopher, your efforts have not gone unnoticed. Why 18, we can do this for the next release (17)? I'm happy to put the time in, it actually works really well for me at the moment as I am working from my apartment now and can put those idle office hours to good use.
Brendan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi:
This is great news about both frescobaldi and supercollider!
My hesitation in terms of schedule is the amount of work you're committing yourself to doing. I can't imagine making a spin all by myself, but if you feel you can, or you can get enough help from others, I'm all for it. And I'll contribute in my usual way: whining on this mailing list and writing about the spin in the Release Notes.
Let's get started!
Christopher.
On 10 December 2011 14:54:34 Brendan Jones wrote:
On 12/10/2011 08:40 PM, Christopher Antila wrote:
Hi:
One package that I use almost every day is "frescobaldi". It was included until Fedora 15, is unmaintained in f16, and has a new upstream release coming soon. The previous maintainer gave us plenty of notice that he would be orphaning the package, and I thought I would be able to pick it up myself, but it's just not feasible for me in the near future. For my own use, it's easy enough to download the Python sources and run it locally... but to have it back in the official repository would be a definite plus for those of us who can't. It's also in the "Musicians' Guide."
If that doesn't interest you, there's the "supercollider" set of packages, currently available in PlanetCCRMA@Home, that I feel would be great to have in the "real" Fedora repositories.
I'll speak to fernando about the supercollider set, as for frescobaldi, I'll unorphan it and put it up for re-review.
BTW Christopher, your efforts have not gone unnoticed. Why 18, we can do this for the next release (17)? I'm happy to put the time in, it actually works really well for me at the moment as I am working from my apartment now and can put those idle office hours to good use.
Brendan _______________________________________________ music mailing list music@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
On 12/11/2011 01:46 AM, Christopher Antila wrote:
This is great news about both frescobaldi and supercollider!
My hesitation in terms of schedule is the amount of work you're committing yourself to doing. I can't imagine making a spin all by myself, but if you feel you can, or you can get enough help from others, I'm all for it. And I'll contribute in my usual way: whining on this mailing list and writing about the spin in the Release Notes.
Let's get started!
I think I will have to do a bit of a feasibility study here before making grandiose claims. I have noticed that there is a lot of work already done in this area so perhaps we can leverage our efforts.
The Frescobaldi release is probably a good place start, as the later version no longer depends on KDE so it kind of opens up our options in terms of what DE we could base it on.
I'll report back when I've done a bit more digging.
Brendan
On 12/11/2011 01:46 AM, Christopher Antila wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi:
This is great news about both frescobaldi and supercollider!
My hesitation in terms of schedule is the amount of work you're committing yourself to doing. I can't imagine making a spin all by myself, but if you feel you can, or you can get enough help from others, I'm all for it. And I'll contribute in my usual way: whining on this mailing list and writing about the spin in the Release Notes.
Let's get started!
Christopher.
I've submitted a review request for python-poppler-qt4 (for the latest frescobaldi if anyone wants to pick it up).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767583
My others can be found here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&classifica...
Brendan
I feel late to the part, but I'm very interested in helping with this. I'm a bit of a n00b when it comes to coding but if someone could point me in the right direction I'll work at some testing to on building packages.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Brendan Jones brendan.jones.it@gmail.comwrote:
On 12/11/2011 01:46 AM, Christopher Antila wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Hi:
This is great news about both frescobaldi and supercollider!
My hesitation in terms of schedule is the amount of work you're committing yourself to doing. I can't imagine making a spin all by myself, but if you feel you can, or you can get enough help from others, I'm all for it. And I'll contribute in my usual way: whining on this mailing list and writing about the spin in the Release Notes.
Let's get started!
Christopher.
I've submitted a review request for python-poppler-qt4 (for the latest frescobaldi if anyone wants to pick it up).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/**show_bug.cgi?id=767583https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=767583
My others can be found here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/**buglist.cgi?query_format=** advanced&classification=**Fedora&product=Fedora&** component=Package%20Review&**bug_status=NEW&emailreporter1=** 1&emailtype1=substring&email1=**brendan.jones.it%40gmail.comhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&classification=Fedora&product=Fedora&component=Package%20Review&bug_status=NEW&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=brendan.jones.it%40gmail.com
Brendan ______________________________**_________________ music mailing list music@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/musichttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
On 02/01/2012 11:44 PM, Brian Monroe wrote:
I feel late to the part, but I'm very interested in helping with this. I'm a bit of a n00b when it comes to coding but if someone could point me in the right direction I'll work at some testing to on building packages.
Thanks for the interest! I'll post the bugzilla links to any major changes / new packages. You can either enable the updates-testing repo or follow the instructions on how to pull the test packages from koji in the BZ.
Brendan
Nice one Brendan,
can you push these on fc15 (fc15 still has 5 months of support from fedora)?
Regards, Simon
Am 10.12.2011 18:13, schrieb Brendan Jones:
Hi all,
I have recently gone through the pain of relocating countries, setting up new workstations etc. and would love to have all the packages I use sitting in Fedora. As a result I've packaged a few things which I use
What is the status of the Fedora Audio SIG? After going through this myself I am keen to resurrect the idea of a Fedora Studio. We could even make it a feature of Fedora 17.
We would probably need to coordinate from planetccrma what desperately needs to be in mainline Fedora and any other packages which are missing. If there is anything you would like packaged which is not let me know.
In the meantime there is a new packages that have hit Fedora 16 (at .least) in the last month or so.
zita-at1 - Fons' auto-tuner zita-rev1 - Reverb from Fons phat - GTK toolkit for audio software, was in planetccrma, depandancy of specimen. New project coming soon to Fedora petri-foo, which replaces/inherits specimen (currently FTBS in planet) clxclient - dependancy of zita*, previously in planetccrma*
I also have a couple of lv2 plugins awaiting review here [1].
Also thinking of packaging Neil, although this will probably need to reside in rpmfusion
regards, Brendan
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&classifica...
FAS: bsjones Freenode: bsjones (not often but will lurk in #fedora-audio, #opensourcemusicians for a bit)
music mailing list music@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
On 12/11/2011 09:43 AM, Simon Lewis wrote:
Nice one Brendan,
can you push these on fc15 (fc15 still has 5 months of support from fedora)?
Regards, Simon
I'm a little hesitant to push these on a stable release as zita-rev1 involves pulling in a soname bump of zita-convolver. I will certainly consider it if enough people ask.
regards,
Brendan
Hello Brendan
It's a shame that fedora does not have a rolling release like openSUSE's Tumbleweed...
A rolling release would get over these soname bumps, which the fedora core developers seldom, if ever, do for the benefit of multi-media community.
Regards, Simon
Am 12.12.2011 18:59, schrieb Brendan Jones:
On 12/11/2011 09:43 AM, Simon Lewis wrote:
Nice one Brendan,
can you push these on fc15 (fc15 still has 5 months of support from fedora)?
Regards, Simon
I'm a little hesitant to push these on a stable release as zita-rev1 involves pulling in a soname bump of zita-convolver. I will certainly consider it if enough people ask.
regards,
Brendan
music mailing list music@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
On 12/11/2011 09:43 AM, Simon Lewis wrote:
Nice one Brendan,
can you push these on fc15 (fc15 still has 5 months of support from fedora)?
Regards, Simon
zita-at1 and zita-rev1 now in fc15 updates-testing. Feel free to leave feedback. The zita-convolver dependency I mentioned was from another build entirely.
================================================================================ zita-at1-0.2.3-4.fc15 ================================================================================ Release: Fedora 15 Status: pending Type: newpackage Karma: 0 Request: testing Bugs: 749756 - Review Request: zita-at1 - autotuner for JACK Notes: zita-at1 is an 'autotuner', normally used for correcting the pitch : of a voice singing slightly out of tune.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-17114/zita-at1-0.2.3-4.f...
================================================================================ zita-rev1-0.2.1-4.fc15 ================================================================================ Update ID: FEDORA-2011-17092 Release: Fedora 15 Status: testing Type: newpackage Karma: 0 Bugs: 749757 - Review Request: zita-rev1 - Proaudio reverb for JACK Notes: zita-rev1 is a reworked version of the reverb originally developed : for Aeolus. Its character is more 'hall' than 'plate', : but it can be used on a wide variety of instruments or : voices. It is not a spatialiser - the early : reflections are different for the L and R inputs, but : do not correspond to any real room. They have been : tuned to match left and right sources to some extent. : In Stereo mode a dry/wet mix control is provided, so : it can be used either as an insert or in send/return : mode. For mono just connect one of the two channels. : In Ambisonic mode (selected by the -B command line : option) the only option is the send/return mode.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2011-17092/zita-rev1-0.2.1-4....
Hello All
I made packages for petri-foo for my own purposes from the latest git sources.
If anyone is interested in testing petri-foo and give feedback / file bug reports to James Morris and his team at tracker at https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=404816
then the i686.rpm / x86_64.rpm / src.rpm packages can be found in my repos as follows:
for fc15 http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/WilliamSimonLewis/Fedora_15/
for fc16 http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/WilliamSimonLewis/Fedora_16/
There are also packages for a2jmidid-7 (with bug fix for clean successful connections to jackd) and harmanySEQ-0.15.
Regards, Simon
Am 10.12.2011 18:13, schrieb Brendan Jones:
Hi all,
I have recently gone through the pain of relocating countries, setting up new workstations etc. and would love to have all the packages I use sitting in Fedora. As a result I've packaged a few things which I use
What is the status of the Fedora Audio SIG? After going through this myself I am keen to resurrect the idea of a Fedora Studio. We could even make it a feature of Fedora 17.
We would probably need to coordinate from planetccrma what desperately needs to be in mainline Fedora and any other packages which are missing. If there is anything you would like packaged which is not let me know.
In the meantime there is a new packages that have hit Fedora 16 (at .least) in the last month or so.
zita-at1 - Fons' auto-tuner zita-rev1 - Reverb from Fons phat - GTK toolkit for audio software, was in planetccrma, depandancy of specimen. New project coming soon to Fedora petri-foo, which replaces/inherits specimen (currently FTBS in planet) clxclient - dependancy of zita*, previously in planetccrma*
I also have a couple of lv2 plugins awaiting review here [1].
Also thinking of packaging Neil, although this will probably need to reside in rpmfusion
regards, Brendan
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&classifica...
FAS: bsjones Freenode: bsjones (not often but will lurk in #fedora-audio, #opensourcemusicians for a bit)
music mailing list music@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
-
Brendan Jones -
Brian Monroe -
Christopher Antila -
Simon Lewis