I got whysynth-dssi-20060122-7.src.rpm from here:
http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/
I rebuilt it on FC6 without problems. The thing is, the GUI doesn't show up. The program appears to be working, I see the outputs being automatically routed in qjackctl, but there's no GUI anywhere!
############################################### $ jack-dssi-host whysynth.so
jack-dssi-host: Warning: DSSI path not set jack-dssi-host: Defaulting to "/usr/local/lib/dssi:/usr/lib/dssi:/home/florin/.dssi"
jack-dssi-host: OSC URL is: osc.udp://rivendell.home.local:15040/dssi/whysynth/WhySynth/chan00
host: Ready WhySynth_gtk starting (pid 4305)... ###############################################
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 23:19 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
I got whysynth-dssi-20060122-7.src.rpm from here:
http://people.redhat.com/green/FE/devel/
I rebuilt it on FC6 without problems. The thing is, the GUI doesn't show up. The program appears to be working, I see the outputs being automatically routed in qjackctl, but there's no GUI anywhere!
Does your hostname resolve (or does "ping localhost" work?)?
My fresh FC6 installation came with a broken /etc/hosts...
# Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. ::1 localhost.localdomain localhost
This makes sense for IPv6, but I'm not using IPv6. Changing this to ...
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
...fixed a number of problems. I suspect it may help you as well, as I understand that liblo (used for GUI communication) is sensitive to problems like this.
AG
Anthony Green wrote:
My fresh FC6 installation came with a broken /etc/hosts...
# Do not remove the following line, or various programs # that require network functionality will fail. ::1 localhost.localdomain localhost
This makes sense for IPv6, but I'm not using IPv6. Changing this to ...
127.0.0.1 localhost.localdomain localhost
...fixed a number of problems.
I actually had both the IPv4 and the IPv6 lines. I commented out the IPv6 stuff. Also, the IP address for the real hostname was broken too - I moved this machine to another net and I forgot to update /etc/hosts
So I fixed both issues and now whysynth is working. I am not sure which one was actually the cause.
I wonder why it's not using localhost, but the Ethernet address instead.
Thanks! :-)
On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 23:19 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
I got whysynth-dssi-20060122-7.src.rpm from here:
By the way... I submitted this package for review 9 months ago today! Can somebody please pick this up?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029
Some other golden oldies...
hydrogen: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040
caps: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190045
Thanks,
AG
Anthony Green wrote:
By the way... I submitted this package for review 9 months ago today! Can somebody please pick this up?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029
Some other golden oldies...
hydrogen: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040
caps: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190045
OK, that does it. What does it take to become a reviewer? I've never been involved with Extras but I've built hundreds of RPMs.
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 21:56 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
OK, that does it. What does it take to become a reviewer? I've never been involved with Extras but I've built hundreds of RPMs.
Great! Before you can review, you need to contribute a package of your own...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors
Once you've had a package accepted you can start reviewing and approving other packages. Let me know when you've submitted something and I'll review it quickly.
AG
Anthony Green wrote:
Great! Before you can review, you need to contribute a package of your own...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors
Once you've had a package accepted you can start reviewing and approving other packages. Let me know when you've submitted something and I'll review it quickly.
Fernando, anything you may suggest I should pick up from PlanetCCRMA for migration to Extras?
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 13:47 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
Anthony Green wrote:
Great! Before you can review, you need to contribute a package of your own...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors
Once you've had a package accepted you can start reviewing and approving other packages. Let me know when you've submitted something and I'll review it quickly.
Fernando, anything you may suggest I should pick up from PlanetCCRMA for migration to Extras?
Hard to say. Qarecord and Timemachine are neat for recording (both are Jack clients). Hmmm, Ardour is there but Jamin is not. And of course you could pick up a LADSPA plugin collection from the many I currently host. For all of them if you pick up the latest fc6 srpm you should be close...
[if you do please try to keep the extra desktop categories I add to the desktop entry, they make it possible to have a neat categorized menu entry for audio apps]
I'm always meaning to add more to Extras but the process is long as you will find out - time flies and tasks pile up too fast on my todo list.
-- Fernando
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
Hard to say. Qarecord and Timemachine are neat for recording (both are Jack clients). Hmmm, Ardour is there but Jamin is not. And of course you could pick up a LADSPA plugin collection from the many I currently host. For all of them if you pick up the latest fc6 srpm you should be close...
Jamin and LADSPA are very important. Lemme take a look...
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano schrieb:
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 13:47 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
Anthony Green wrote:
Great! Before you can review, you need to contribute a package of your own... http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors Once you've had a package accepted you can start reviewing and approving other packages. Let me know when you've submitted something and I'll review it quickly.
Fernando, anything you may suggest I should pick up from PlanetCCRMA for migration to Extras?
[...] I'm always meaning to add more to Extras but the process is long as you will find out - time flies and tasks pile up too fast on my todo list.
Just my 2 cent: Maybe you guys should use the "MediaProduction Special Interest Group" http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/MediaProduction in a similar way as the Games SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Games -- e.g. maintain a list of packages in the wiki that are pending review and try to exchange reviews between SIG members. That could speed up things a lot -- I got the impression that many "normal" reviewers fear to touch the "music packages" as they don't understand much about music editing in general or jack.
CU thl
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Just my 2 cent: Maybe you guys should use the "MediaProduction Special Interest Group" http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/MediaProduction in a similar way as the Games SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Games -- e.g. maintain a list of packages in the wiki that are pending review and try to exchange reviews between SIG members. That could speed up things a lot -- I got the impression that many "normal" reviewers fear to touch the "music packages" as they don't understand much about music editing in general or jack.
Great idea, but the amount of red tape surrounding Extras is staggering.
<sigh> I'll try and get edit permissions to the Wiki.
On Sun, 28 Jan 2007, Florin Andrei wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
Just my 2 cent: Maybe you guys should use the "MediaProduction Special Interest Group" http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/MediaProduction in a similar way as the Games SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Games -- e.g. maintain a list of packages in the wiki that are pending review and try to exchange reviews between SIG members. That could speed up things a lot -- I got the impression that many "normal" reviewers fear to touch the "music packages" as they don't understand much about music editing in general or jack.
Great idea, but the amount of red tape surrounding Extras is staggering.
<sigh> I'll try and get edit permissions to the Wiki.
For what it's worth, we're working to cut this down. The barrier for working on the wiki in particular is way too high, and we know it.
--g
------------------------------------------------------------- Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors -------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote:
For what it's worth, we're working to cut this down. The barrier for working on the wiki in particular is way too high, and we know it.
Thank you!
Anthony Green wrote:
Great! Before you can review, you need to contribute a package of your own...
Done:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225114
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 21:56 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote:
Anthony Green wrote:
By the way... I submitted this package for review 9 months ago today! Can somebody please pick this up?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190029
Some other golden oldies...
hydrogen: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040
caps: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190045
OK, that does it. What does it take to become a reviewer? I've never been involved with Extras but I've built hundreds of RPMs.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Contributors
More help would be really appreciated... I also have freqtweak and sooperlooper on the queue, languishing...
-- Fernando
On Sat, 2007-01-27 at 11:27 -0800, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
More help would be really appreciated... I also have freqtweak and sooperlooper on the queue, languishing...
Sorry Fernando.. I thought I was waiting on final updates from you for those packages, aren't I?
AG
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 09:03 -0800, Anthony Green wrote:
hydrogen: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040
Heh, I was reviewing hydrogen and was almost done, but then bugzilla died and... I kinda forgot about it. I should probably finish that up...
-
Anthony Green -
Callum Lerwick -
Fernando Lopez-Lezcano -
Florin Andrei -
Greg DeKoenigsberg -
Thorsten Leemhuis