Can someone enlighten me why we forked these packages with the naming
scheme this way?
I know that the licensing changed from the version 2 and version 3 releases
and caused us to package them separately, but it seems to me like it's
backwards. Is there a fedora policy that would prohibit us from packaging
ardour3 under the package name ardour and ardour ver 2 under ardour2.
I can see this as being a potentially sore spot for new users to try to
install Ardour with "yum install ardour" and being disappointed and or
confused with why Fedora is a whole version behind. Or bewildered when they
start using the program and it doesn't look right and the menus are all
wrong according to the website.
Show replies by date