Hi,
I've committed a change that should fix the problem of the install option still showing up on the installed system that Edward Borasky found. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883367 A new compose is at http://imalone.fedorapeople.org/Fedora-Jam-64bit-20121205.iso this also includes the changes Jørn made in response to Christoph Wickert's suggestions. We no longer have our own theme set automatically :( still, there are rules, we have to play by them.
Will see if I can add anything to the Jack/Pulse stuff on the wiki this weekend, was holding off while I tried to figure out if anything would be likely to be different to previously, but it seems not.
On 12/08/2012 01:06 AM, Ian Malone wrote:
Hi,
I've committed a change that should fix the problem of the install option still showing up on the installed system that Edward Borasky found. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883367 A new compose is at http://imalone.fedorapeople.org/Fedora-Jam-64bit-20121205.iso this also includes the changes Jørn made in response to Christoph Wickert's suggestions. We no longer have our own theme set automatically :( still, there are rules, we have to play by them.
Will see if I can add anything to the Jack/Pulse stuff on the wiki this weekend, was holding off while I tried to figure out if anything would be likely to be different to previously, but it seems not.
Thanks for doing that! It's god to see some enthusiasm for the spin. We are this [ ] close to having the spin approved now, and if we all cross our finger swe might just make it for f18
The themes should apply automaticly in the near future. The part of the kickstart that enabled the theme by default has been moved to the fedora-jam-theme package, so when the updated theme package goes into updates/stable it should work again.
On 12/08/2012 01:11 AM, Jørn Lomax wrote:
The themes should apply automaticly in the near future. The part of the kickstart that enabled the theme by default has been moved to the fedora-jam-theme package, so when the updated theme package goes into updates/stable it should work again.
Enable updates-testing in my local compose from yesterday resulted in the default theme applied with these changes. We just need to get it into updates-stable. It should meet the requisite time spent in testing soon but leaving extra karma can't hurt:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-19785/fedora-jam-kde-the...
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Ian Malone ibmalone@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've committed a change that should fix the problem of the install option still showing up on the installed system that Edward Borasky found. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=883367 A new compose is at http://imalone.fedorapeople.org/Fedora-Jam-64bit-20121205.iso this also includes the changes Jørn made in response to Christoph Wickert's suggestions. We no longer have our own theme set automatically :( still, there are rules, we have to play by them.
I'm testing the kickstart file at the moment; so far everything looks good.
On 8 December 2012 00:06, Ian Malone ibmalone@gmail.com wrote:
Will see if I can add anything to the Jack/Pulse stuff on the wiki this weekend, was holding off while I tried to figure out if anything would be likely to be different to previously, but it seems not.
Made some updates to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JACK_Audio_Connection_Kit#Integrate_Jack_with...
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Ian Malone ibmalone@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2012 00:06, Ian Malone ibmalone@gmail.com wrote:
Will see if I can add anything to the Jack/Pulse stuff on the wiki this weekend, was holding off while I tried to figure out if anything would be likely to be different to previously, but it seems not.
Made some updates to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JACK_Audio_Connection_Kit#Integrate_Jack_with...
-- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk _______________________________________________ music mailing list music@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
I tried realTimeConfigQuickScan with the current spin ISO and there were a couple of issues that it flagged. I'm not on that machine at the moment but I can get back to it later tonight. Still, there does not appear to be *any* CPU frequency / performance governor package in either Fedora 17 or Fedora 18. You have to poke the values manually as 'root' into the /proc filesystem as far as I can tell. The same goes for "swappiness", another parameter that realTimeConfigQuickScan flagged on my machine.
I'll go ahead and file a documentation bug against realTimeConfigQuickScan when I get back to my machine.
On 12/09/2012 11:12 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Ian Malone ibmalone@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2012 00:06, Ian Malone ibmalone@gmail.com wrote:
Will see if I can add anything to the Jack/Pulse stuff on the wiki this weekend, was holding off while I tried to figure out if anything would be likely to be different to previously, but it seems not.
Made some updates to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JACK_Audio_Connection_Kit#Integrate_Jack_with...
-- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk _______________________________________________ music mailing list music@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
I tried realTimeConfigQuickScan with the current spin ISO and there were a couple of issues that it flagged. I'm not on that machine at the moment but I can get back to it later tonight. Still, there does not appear to be *any* CPU frequency / performance governor package in either Fedora 17 or Fedora 18. You have to poke the values manually as 'root' into the /proc filesystem as far as I can tell. The same goes for "swappiness", another parameter that realTimeConfigQuickScan flagged on my machine.
I'll go ahead and file a documentation bug against realTimeConfigQuickScan when I get back to my machine.
Its handled by cpupower now in Fedora. realTimeConfigQuickScan should be easy enough to patch to detect its presence and display a message regarding that I would have thought. I can look into it if you like.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JACK_Audio_Connection_Kit#CPU_Performance_Gov...
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Brendan Jones brendan.jones.it@gmail.com wrote:
Its handled by cpupower now in Fedora. realTimeConfigQuickScan should be easy enough to patch to detect its presence and display a message regarding that I would have thought. I can look into it if you like.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JACK_Audio_Connection_Kit#CPU_Performance_Gov...
Last time I checked, cpupower was in Fedora 16 but not in 17 or 18 because of a lack of maintainer commitment. If I had a system with F16 and upgraded it to 17, would the upgrade remove cpupower?
music mailing list music@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/music
On 12/10/2012 12:52 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Brendan Jones brendan.jones.it@gmail.com wrote:
Its handled by cpupower now in Fedora. realTimeConfigQuickScan should be easy enough to patch to detect its presence and display a message regarding that I would have thought. I can look into it if you like.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JACK_Audio_Connection_Kit#CPU_Performance_Gov...
Last time I checked, cpupower was in Fedora 16 but not in 17 or 18 because of a lack of maintainer commitment. If I had a system with F16 and upgraded it to 17, would the upgrade remove cpupower?
Looks like cpupower has been moved into kernel-tools. Good catch. We will want to add this too the spin. I'll update the wiki
On 12/09/2012 09:52 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 8 December 2012 00:06, Ian Malone ibmalone@gmail.com wrote:
Will see if I can add anything to the Jack/Pulse stuff on the wiki this weekend, was holding off while I tried to figure out if anything would be likely to be different to previously, but it seems not.
Made some updates to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JACK_Audio_Connection_Kit#Integrate_Jack_with...
That's great Ian. Thanks
On 8 December 2012 00:06, Ian Malone ibmalone@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, a new test compose, corresponding roughly to Fedora 18 TC3: http://imalone.fedorapeople.org/Fedora-Jam-x86_64-20121218.iso
Likely to be the last one I'm able to do before the New Year.
On 12/19/2012 02:41 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 8 December 2012 00:06, Ian Malone ibmalone@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, a new test compose, corresponding roughly to Fedora 18 TC3: http://imalone.fedorapeople.org/Fedora-Jam-x86_64-20121218.iso
Likely to be the last one I'm able to do before the New Year.
Thanks Ian!
I'm trying really hard to get this into the nightlies so hopefully we won't need another one. I don't think there will be any pulls into stable that affect us before release anyhow. Everything from here will be zero-day updates.
On 19 December 2012 14:03, Brendan Jones brendan.jones.it@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/19/2012 02:41 PM, Ian Malone wrote:
On 8 December 2012 00:06, Ian Malone ibmalone@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, a new test compose, corresponding roughly to Fedora 18 TC3: http://imalone.fedorapeople.org/Fedora-Jam-x86_64-20121218.iso
Likely to be the last one I'm able to do before the New Year.
Thanks Ian!
I'm trying really hard to get this into the nightlies so hopefully we won't need another one. I don't think there will be any pulls into stable that affect us before release anyhow. Everything from here will be zero-day updates.
Yes, I thought it would be worth having one that corresponded to a Final TC. I've just checked and there are no audio component blockers/NTH (unless you count one rhythmbox crash, but we don't include it).