omit inbox tag on sent folder
by R. Andrew Bailey
I've been using mutt-kz for several months and absolutely love it. I
suspect this is a dumb question, so apologies in advance.
I use 'set record="+sent"', and I find that my sent mail is
automatically indexed (good), but that it gets tagged as +inbox. I
considered adding sent to the new.ignore option in notmuch-config, but
I definitely like having it indexed.
I'm thinking I can ignore sent and then use a post send hook to index
my sentmail folder without adding +inbox, but I'm guessing there may
be some simpler way to do this. Any advice appreciated.
.andy
10 years, 11 months
Mark read using notmuch tag -unread
by Stefan Hajnoczi
Hi,
I've been using notmuch together with mutt to solve an email
annoyance: a message in multiple folders should be marked read all at
once. With vanilla mutt you need to mark the message read in each
folder (my messages are filtered into mailing list folders, so I have
this problem when a message is CCed to multiple mailing lists that I
subscribe to).
Here's the macro I use:
macro index \Cr "<enter-command>unset
wait_key<enter><pipe-message>~/notmuch/contrib/notmuch-mutt/notmuch-mutt
tag --whole-thread --
-unread<enter><sync-mailbox><previous-unread><next-unread>" "Mark
thread read and jump to next unread message"
Together with a notmuch-mutt patch that I recently sent:
http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2012/012527.html
Forking a notmuch-mutt process and syncing the mailbox afterwards
takes some time. It would be much smoother if mutt was linked against
notmuch... So here is my question:
Can mutt-kz do this? Ideally <read-thread> would use notmuch to
remove the unread tag from all messages in a thread.
It's not clear to me from skimming the source. The notmuch
integration seems to be focussed on virtual folders/queries and some
convenience commands rather than replacing mutt's message access (e.g.
maildir) completely with notmuch.
Stefan
11 years, 6 months
Using %X in $index_format
by Suvayu Ali
Hi,
I am using "%4C %Z %?X?@& ? %{%b %d} %-15.15n (%?M?»%3M&%4c?) %s" as my
$index_format. This works well with mutt, but with mutt-kz "%?X?@& ?"
does not seem to work as expected. My goal with that bit was to show
"@" when the message has an attachment and " " otherwise.
I looked in init.h, the docs for $index_format seem to mention %X so I
am not sure what I am doing wrong. Any ideas?
If I wanted to fix this bug myself, which part of the source should I look
at? It would be great if someone could point me in the right direction.
Thanks,
--
Suvayu
Open source is the future. It sets us free.
11 years, 6 months
