On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 01:39:59PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> - Is there any plans of doing a release?
Good question. I'd like to update my Fedora packages with mutt-kz
this week. Not sure about a real release.
Having at least tags on the git repo
would help to track changes - wdyt?
> - What about cleaning all the hg stuff from the repo since
we've moved
> to git (volunteering myself)
Well, we still merge from the official mutt upstream -- so it would
be probably good to keep the code "compatible" with the upstream.
So this isn't a "real" fork, in the sense that you are trying to stay
compatible with "upstream". I'd like to do some cleanups/refactoring,
but that complicates things if not done upstream first (and that means
fiddling with hg #sadpanda).
> - Any reason for not renaming the target executable to mutt-kz?
Not sure, it would be probably better to keep it compatible.
Since it's not a
"hard" fork, +1.
Note that you don't want to install mutt to test it. I use it
directly from git repo, just "make" and "./mutt" (or ./mutt -F
~/.muttrc-kz etc.)
Doing this already :)
--
qmx