On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Dale Bewley <dlbewley(a)lib.ucdavis.edu>
wrote:
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 16:04 -0500, Max Spevack wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Pascal Calarco wrote:
> > * Pascal will update the FWN StyleGuide to indicate that person
> > references should ideally reference the appropriate User: wiki page,
> > if it exists. If it does not, we will use CamelCase references as a
> > fallback.
Ian Weller tells me FAS users can be queried on IRC by messaging zodbot:
(02:56:24 PM) ianweller: .fas karsten wade
(02:56:25 PM) zodbot: ianweller: quaid 'Karsten Wade' ..<snip>..
(02:56:29 PM) ianweller: .wikilink quaid
(02:56:31 PM) zodbot: ianweller: [[User:quaid|Karsten Wade]]
This does seem to be handy, if not outisde typical workflow. It doesn't
seem complete though:
(03:08:31 PM) dbewley1: .fas dale bewley
(03:08:33 PM) zodbot: dbewley1: 'dale bewley' Not Found!
I checked and I have the 'privacy' box ticked in FAS, so I guess that's
why I'm missing.
I see that to appease the wiki czar, we've so far decided to link to
[[User:FAS_LOGIN|Full Name]] and fall back to camel case after a manual
query fails.
To be honest, I'm not very inclined to search for FAS usernames given a
full name just to link them from the article. I think it would be a
little too onerous. If camel case names are deemed evil, should we
discuss how valuable it is to have name links at all? Generally I'm all
for the more links the better, but I'd prefer to keep things as easy as
possible on us writers.
I'm in agreement here I think. Unless there's an easy way to find
people's names or guess them then it becomes time-consuming to find them
in the wiki. I was using the wiki advanced search with the User box
ticked and gave up after doing a couple because it took so long. By
comparison it's pretty easy to guess people's CamelCase name in general.
The only way I can think of around this is to obtain a dump of the FAS
usernames correlated to the surname/familyname of the user. We could
probably then use this to build dictionaries for whatever texteditors we
use (see next point).
Maybe we can discuss beat writer personal workflows. Describe our
own
habits, and pick up some tips from others. Probably best to start a new
thread for that.
The workflows do indeed make a big difference to what we expect or can
achieve from the above changes. I'll look for the other thread or go
start it now. Mine's a bit wonky but it had distinct advantages until
the above changes!
Best wishes,
--
Oisin Feeley
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OisinFeeley