[nmstate-devel] Re: VLAN MTU bug: https://github.com/nmstate/nmstate/pull/563

[Edward Haas]

>  On 21 Nov 2019, at 16:50, Gris Ge <fge(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  
>  Hi Edy and Fernando,
>  
>  This is what I found to workaround the VLAN MTU bug:
>  
>     1. Include vlan interface in desired state if base-iface changed
>        its MTUs.
>  
>     2. Place vlan interface __after__ other interface when activation
>  
>  To test whether step 2 works, I created patch:
>  
>     http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/816035
>  
>  It works well when I include both vlan and base-iface in the same
>  yml file with base-iface changed its MTU. 
But does it work when you do not include the vlan?
Current iface/mtu: eth0=2000, eth0.101=2000
Desired: eth0=3000
Is vlan 101 ok?
>  
>  
>  Hope this helps.
>  
>  -- 
>  Gris Ge