Missing packages in centos8

[Fernando Fernandez Mancera]

Hi!

I have been trying to move all the CI tests to centos8. I have found
that this is not going to be possible as some packages are missing.
Here is the list of them:

-

I have also tried to look up for a workaround but I have not been able
to do it. Do you have any idea? If not, we should move all F31 test to
rawhide in my opinion.

Thanks,
Fernando.

[Fernando Fernandez Mancera]

Whoops sorry, missing list.

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 11:33 AM Fernando Fernandez Mancera
<ferferna(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  Hi!
>
>  I have been trying to move all the CI tests to centos8. I have found
>  that this is not going to be possible as some packages are missing.
>  Here is the list of them:
>
>  - 
- python3-coveralls
- python3-tox
- python37
- python38

>  I have also tried to look up for a workaround but I have not been able
>  to do it. Do you have any idea? If not, we should move all F31 test to
>  rawhide in my opinion.
>
>  Thanks,
>  Fernando.

[Edward Haas]

Thank you Fernando!

>  On 31 Jan 2020, at 12:41, Fernando Fernandez Mancera
> <ferferna(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  
>  Whoops sorry, missing list.
>  
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 11:33 AM Fernando Fernandez Mancera
> > <ferferna(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > I have been trying to move all the CI tests to centos8. I have found
> > that this is not going to be possible as some packages are missing.
> > Here is the list of them:
> > 
> > -
>  
>  - python3-coveralls
>  - python3-tox 
What these two provide is available through pip3.

>  - python37
>  - python38 
For these, Fedora rawhide is the only option.

>  
> > 
> > I have also tried to look up for a workaround but I have not been able
> > to do it. Do you have any idea? If not, we should move all F31 test to
> > rawhide in my opinion. 
I am good with moving whatever is possible to CentOS and the rest to Fedora rawhide until
32 is available.
Pip3 can be used if something is missing on CentOS for the test infra.

> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Fernando.
>  _______________________________________________
>  nmstate-devel mailing list -- nmstate-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to nmstate-devel-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>  List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  List Archives:
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[e-mail]...

[Till Maas]

Hi,

Am Fr., 31. Jan. 2020 um 11:41 Uhr schrieb Fernando Fernandez Mancera
<ferferna(a)redhat.com&gt;:

>  > I have been trying to move all the CI tests to centos8. I have
> found
>  > that this is not going to be possible as some packages are missing.
>  > Here is the list of them:
>  >
>  > -
>
>  - python3-coveralls 
It is odd that this is installed in the image because coveralls runs
on Travis/Ubuntu and not in the image:
https://github.com/nmstate/nmstate/blob/master/.travis.yml#L62

This can probably be dropped.

>  - python3-tox 
We could install this via pip.

>  - python37 
This is only needed if we plan to support Fedora 31 I think. Fedora 32
will have Python 3.8

>  - python38 
I guess we will have to continue to run the unit tests for this on Fedora.

These problems also lead to the question, what are we going to do with
nmstate-0.1? If we change the CI container images it will also impact
any CI jobs when we merge anything back into the nmstate-0.1 branch.
For example updating the CentOS container image to 1.22 will mean that
a PR to nmstate-0.1 will also be tested against NM 1.22. Do we need
per branch CI images or can we drop support for nmstate-0.1 now?

Kind regards
Till

>  >
>  > I have also tried to look up for a workaround but I have not been able
>  > to do it. Do you have any idea? If not, we should move all F31 test to
>  > rawhide in my opinion.
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  > Fernando.
>  _______________________________________________
>  nmstate-devel mailing list -- nmstate-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to nmstate-devel-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>  Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>  List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  List Archives:
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[e-mail]... 


-- 
Till Maas
He/His/Him
Ansible RHEL Networking System Role Maintainer

Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill,
Thomas Savage

[Fernando Fernandez Mancera]

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:21 PM Till Maas <till(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  Hi,
>
>  Am Fr., 31. Jan. 2020 um 11:41 Uhr schrieb Fernando Fernandez Mancera
>  <ferferna(a)redhat.com&gt;:
>
>  > > I have been trying to move all the CI tests to centos8. I have found
>  > > that this is not going to be possible as some packages are missing.
>  > > Here is the list of them:
>  > >
>  > > -
>  >
>  > - python3-coveralls
>
>  It is odd that this is installed in the image because coveralls runs
>  on Travis/Ubuntu and not in the image:
>  https://github.com/nmstate/nmstate/blob/master/.travis.yml#L62
>
>  This can probably be dropped.
>
>  > - python3-tox
>
>  We could install this via pip.
>
>  > - python37
>
>  This is only needed if we plan to support Fedora 31 I think. Fedora 32
>  will have Python 3.8
>
>  > - python38
>
>  I guess we will have to continue to run the unit tests for this on Fedora.
>
>  These problems also lead to the question, what are we going to do with
>  nmstate-0.1? If we change the CI container images it will also impact
>  any CI jobs when we merge anything back into the nmstate-0.1 branch.
>  For example updating the CentOS container image to 1.22 will mean that
>  a PR to nmstate-0.1 will also be tested against NM 1.22. Do we need
>  per branch CI images or can we drop support for nmstate-0.1 now?
>  
I think we can keep a F31 Dockerfile and configure travis for
nmstate-0.1 branch to run with that image. I don't know if that is
possible but I will try to think in a workaround.

>  Kind regards
>  Till
>
>  >
>  > >
>  > > I have also tried to look up for a workaround but I have not been able
>  > > to do it. Do you have any idea? If not, we should move all F31 test to
>  > > rawhide in my opinion.
>  > >
>  > > Thanks,
>  > > Fernando.
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > nmstate-devel mailing list -- nmstate-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>  > To unsubscribe send an email to nmstate-devel-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>  > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>  > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  > List Archives:
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[e-mail]...
>
>
>
>  --
>  Till Maas
>  He/His/Him
>  Ansible RHEL Networking System Role Maintainer
>
>  Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.redhat.com/, Registered seat: Grasbrunn,
>  Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
>  Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill,
>  Thomas Savage
>