new approach. Thanks Gris for the help!
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 5:03 PM Edward Haas <ehaas(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On 21 Nov 2019, at 16:50, Gris Ge <fge(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Edy and Fernando,
> This is what I found to workaround the VLAN MTU bug:
> 1. Include vlan interface in desired state if base-iface changed
> its MTUs.
> 2. Place vlan interface __after__ other interface when activation
> To test whether step 2 works, I created patch:
> It works well when I include both vlan and base-iface in the same
> yml file with base-iface changed its MTU.
But does it work when you do not include the vlan?
Current iface/mtu: eth0=2000, eth0.101=2000
Is vlan 101 ok?
> Hope this helps.
> Gris Ge