nodejs October 2015

nodejs@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
3 discussions

Source0 for nodejs modules
by Piotr Popieluch 04 Dec '18

04 Dec '18

The the Node.js guidelines say about Source0 [1]: "The canonical method for shipping most node modules is tarballs from the npm registry" and "This method [PP: tarbals from npm] should be preferred to using checkouts from git or automatically generated tarballs from GitHub." But I think that in following cases it would be better to use sources from the upstream project: 1) When the license is not included in NPM but is in upstream project. o Because we are not supposed to ship the license separate from the sources. 2) When the tests are not included. o In this case we need to download the sources from NPM and from upstream project, which seems redundant and a waste of work. 3) When NPM content is generated and source files are not in NPM. o This would mean to download sources from NPM and upstream project, delete the NPM sources in prep and generate the files again. Are there good reason to enforce the use of NPM sources which I am missing? What is your opinion? I would like to suggest to ad those three exceptions to the guidelines. Piotr [1]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Node.js?rd=Node.js/Packagers#Using…

4 5

Self-introduction + package review swaps
by Jared K. Smith 20 Oct '15

20 Oct '15

Hello all... I'm Jared Smith, a long-time Fedora developer. I'm very new to NodeJS, but have been on a bit of a packaging kick this week helping out the new IoT SIG with getting some programs packaged up into Fedora. I have the following outstanding package review requests, and would be happy to swap reviews with anyone else to help push some of these packages forward. nodejs-depd: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269617 nodejs-content-type: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269620 nodejs-http-errors: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269642 nodejs-ee-first: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269648 nodejs-on-finished: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269651 nodejs-mime-db: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269658 nodejs-mime-types: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269670 nodejs-media-typer: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269672 nodejs-type-is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269676 Once those get reviewed, I'd appreciate some help with trying to get nodejs-body-parser packaged up -- I've got a draft package started, but the tests are failing and I haven't been able to figure out why yet. -Jared

3 4

UnSubscribe
by Napoleon Quashie 08 Oct '15

08 Oct '15

Sent from my Samsung device -------- Original message -------- From: Tom Hughes <tom(a)compton.nu> Date: 08/10/2015 16:17 (GMT+00:00) To: "Node.js on Fedora" <nodejs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> Subject: Re: Self-introduction + package review swaps On 08/10/15 15:51, Jared K. Smith wrote: > I have the following outstanding package review requests, and would be > happy to swap reviews with anyone else to help push some of these > packages forward. As you're aware I've already done a couple of our packages, and I'll try and look at some more this evening. I've got a couple of nodejs packages awaiting review if you'd like to help out in return: 1223550 nodejs-fill-keys 1257707 nodejs-should-http Beyond that I have some C++ based packages awaiting review if you're up for dealing with that. Tom -- Tom Hughes (tom(a)compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ _______________________________________________ nodejs mailing list nodejs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/nodejs

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

nodejs October 2015