On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 6:10 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 3:05 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 6:02 PM Troy Dawson <tdawson@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Here is almost a first draft of the Change Proposal.
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleByDefault
> > >
> > > I currently have two questions
> > > 1 - Name ... I'm having a hard time with the name. I'm currently at
> > > "Stop Shipping Individual Nodejs Library Packages" but that doesn't
> > > seem right.
> >
> > "Give up on packaging nodejs libraries"?
> >
>
> Well, ya, if we're going to be honest, that is the best title. :)
>
The only bit I don't really know about with this proposal so far is
how to deal with license auditing. Our license tags are supposed to
reflect the licenses of all the different projects being shipped, and
we don't have good tools for that yet...
There's some in-progress work for rust2rpm[1], but we don't have
anything *really* to handle this well.
[1]: https://pagure.io/fedora-rust/rust2rpm/pull-request/105
Node’s package.json contains the license, so we should be able to just extract that recursively.
> > > 2 - Updates. Do we have some package with a giant list of obsoletes?
> > > If so, what package?
> > >
> >
> > We have fedora-obsolete-packages:
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-obsolete-packages
> >
> >
>
> Cool. I didn't know we had that.
It's been a few years, but I always remember it because I suggested it
to tibbs years ago. :)
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!