Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: The latest F14 ocaml-lablgtk has lower NVR than F13
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626765
Summary: The latest F14 ocaml-lablgtk has lower NVR than F13 Product: Fedora Version: 14 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ocaml-lablgtk AssignedTo: gemi@bluewin.ch ReportedBy: atkac@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: dwheeler@dwheeler.com, gemi@bluewin.ch, rjones@redhat.com, amdunn@gmail.com, fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Description of problem: The latest F14 ocaml-lablgtk has lower NVR than F13 because the latest F14 build failed (https://kojiweb.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=187388).
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): $ koji latest-pkg dist-f13-updates ocaml-lablgtk Build Tag Built by ---------------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------- ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-5.fc13 dist-f13-updates dwheeler
$ koji latest-pkg dist-f14-updates-candidate ocaml-lablgtk Build Tag Built by ---------------------------------------- -------------------- ---------------- ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-4.fc13 dist-f14 rjones
Actual results: F13 package is newer than F14 one
Expected results: F14 NVR >= F13 NVR
Additional info: Main problem is that ocaml-lablgtk redefines glib's g_value_{get,set}_variant symbols. I'm not sure if simple removal of those symbols from ocaml-lablgtk sources doesn't cause regression.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626765
--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com 2010-08-24 07:31:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0)
Additional info: Main problem is that ocaml-lablgtk redefines glib's g_value_{get,set}_variant symbols. I'm not sure if simple removal of those symbols from ocaml-lablgtk sources doesn't cause regression.
This came up on the mailing list: http://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~garrigue/soft/olabl/lablgtk-list/628.txt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626765
--- Comment #2 from Adam Tkac atkac@redhat.com 2010-08-24 07:50:25 EDT --- Thanks for info. Are you going to fix this issue and release update for F14, please, or should I do it myself?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626765
--- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com 2010-08-24 08:23:36 EDT --- Please go ahead.
It wasn't clear to me whether upstream had posted a fix or if they were just saying the fix was 'easy'. You might want to send an email to Jacques if you can't find the right patch.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626765
Adam Tkac atkac@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|gemi@bluewin.ch |atkac@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626765
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626765
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-24 09:41:19 EDT --- ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-6.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-6.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626765
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-08-24 21:23:40 EDT --- ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-6.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ocaml-lablgtk'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-6.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626765
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2010-09-08 00:35:43 EDT --- ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-6.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626765
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |ocaml-lablgtk-2.14.0-6.fc14 Resolution| |ERRATA Last Closed| |2010-09-08 00:35:48
ocaml-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Red Hat Bugzilla