Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: ocaml-cairo: cairo_ps_surface_set_dpi_REPLACED_BY_cairo_surface_set_fallback_resolution
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
Summary: ocaml-cairo: cairo_ps_surface_set_dpi_REPLACED_BY_cairo_surface_set _fallback_resolution Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: ocaml-cairo AssignedTo: rjones@redhat.com ReportedBy: rjones@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: rjones@redhat.com, orion@cora.nwra.com, fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com Depends on: 541427 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Clone Of: 541427
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #541427 +++
Description of problem:
yum -y install ocaml-cairo-devel - does not install ocaml-lablgtk-devel, and:
# cat test_cairo.ml module C = Cairo # ocamlfind c -package cairo -linkpkg test_cairo.ml -o test_cairo ocamlfind: Package `lablgtk2' not found - Required by `cairo.lablgtk2'
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0.0-1.fc13
Other error after ocaml-lablgtk-devel is:
# ocamlfind c -package cairo -linkpkg test_cairo.ml -o test_cairo File "test_cairo.ml", line 1, characters 0-1: Error: Error on dynamically loaded library: /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllmlcairo.so: /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs/dllmlcairo.so: undefined symbol: cairo_ps_surface_set_dpi_REPLACED_BY_cairo_surface_set_fallback_resolution
can file separate bug if desired.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
Bug 541542 depends on bug 541427, which changed state.
Bug 541427 Summary: ocaml-cairo-devel needs to require ocaml-lablgtk-devel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541427
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(orion@cora.nwra.c | |om)
--- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com 2009-11-26 04:48:35 EDT --- Orion, can you attach the test_cairo.ml program to this bug?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(orion@cora.nwra.c | |om) |
--- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com 2009-11-26 13:46:43 EDT --- It's in the comment above - it's one line.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
--- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com 2009-11-26 14:11:28 EDT --- Yup, I'm being stupid.
This works OK for me:
$ echo 'module C = Cairo' > test_cairo.ml $ ocamlfind c -package cairo -linkpkg test_cairo.ml -o test_cairo $ ./test_cairo [no errors]
ocaml-3.11.1-5.fc13.x86_64 ocaml-findlib-1.2.5-1.fc13.x86_64 ocaml-cairo-1.2.0.cvs20080301-11.fc12.x86_64 cairo-1.8.8-3.fc12.x86_64 cairo-devel-1.8.8-3.fc12.x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
--- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com 2009-11-30 12:53:31 EDT --- Looks like you have a newer ocaml-cairo. I have:
ocaml-cairo-1.0.0-2.fc13.x86_64
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com 2009-11-30 14:55:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4)
Looks like you have a newer ocaml-cairo. I have:
ocaml-cairo-1.0.0-2.fc13.x86_64
Upstream version numbers went backwards, which is why we had to use an epoch. Your ocaml-cairo is actually newer.
I upgraded to 1:ocaml-cairo-1.0.0-2.fc13, and now I do see the error. I've raised the issue with upstream.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
--- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com 2009-12-07 04:20:50 EDT --- I got a reply from upstream, and basically we messed up the packaging here. The upstream version numbers didn't go back, 1.2.0 is the latest version, and 1.0.0 is an old version. I'll have to sort this out ...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
--- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com 2009-12-07 10:01:42 EDT --- I'm building a new package which should fix this:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1859347
* Mon Dec 7 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com - 1:1.2.0-0.1.gita5c5ee9f - So we are wrong, version numbers did NOT roll backwards. - Revert to current git head (a5c5ee9f) which is a pre-release of 1.2.0 (RHBZ#541542). - Replace %%define with %%global. - Patch0 is now upstream. - Checked package with rpmlint - no problems.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
--- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com 2009-12-07 11:17:15 EDT --- Grrr unluckily we just hit this issue:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-December/msg00230.htm...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
Richard W.M. Jones rjones@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |545116
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
Bug 541542 depends on bug 545116, which changed state.
Bug 545116 Summary: rpm-build 4.8 conflicts with ocaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=545116
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
--- Comment #10 from Bug Zapper triage@lists.fedoraproject.org 2011-06-02 13:18:26 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 13 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 13. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '13'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 13's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 13 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=541542
Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1:1.2.0-0.2.gita5c5ee9f.fc1 | |3 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(rjones@redhat.com | |) | Last Closed| |2011-06-02 17:23:16
ocaml-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org