Rainbow in F-11 and F-12
by Bernie Innocenti
I'd like to import rainbow 0.8.6 in Fedora devel and backport it to
F-11, for the purpose of getting it in the Paraguayan build, and maybe
also in the F11-XO1 and SoaS, if there's interest.
Anything important I should be aware of?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
14 years, 2 months
B R E A K T H R O U G H -- F11-on-XO1 has working video player
by Mikus Grinbergs
Ever since mid-December 2008, none of the newer XO-1 builds (beyond
8.2.x) were able to properly show any "moving pictures" for me.
I ended up substituting another video driver in place of xv. That gave
me a smaller picture (sometimes showing only "snapshots" rather than a
"movie").
Having applied the ticket #9590 fix (adding 'Virtual 1200 900' to the
"Screen" section of xorg.conf), I changed my os11 systems back to using
the xv video driver. I tested under identical conditions both with and
without the #9590 fix. That single change made the difference -- now on
my XO_1 systems, "moving pictures" work properly in F11-on-XO1 builds.
Prior to the application of the #9590 fix I could not honestly recommend
any builds beyond 8.2.x to an XO-1 owner. Now I can.
mikus
p.s. My current Mplayer command line:
> mplayer -framedrop -vo xv -vfm ffmpeg -lavdopts skipframe=nonref:skiploopfilter=nonkey:fast=1
14 years, 2 months
New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 109
by Chris Ball
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5
http://build.laptop.org/10.2.0/os109
Compressed image size: 706.41mb (+1.72mb since build 108)
Description of changes in this build:
* pull F11 updates
* olpc-kbdshim: don't rotate input on a failed screen rotation (#9350)
* kernel: camera oops fix from corbet (#9958)
* batterymon: new package, battery applet for GNOME (#9987)
* olpc-utils: start batterymon on GNOME launch (#9987)
Package changes since build 108:
-alsa-lib-1.0.22-2.fc11.i586
+alsa-lib-1.0.22-3.fc11.i586
-alsa-utils-1.0.21-2.fc11.i586
+alsa-utils-1.0.22-1.fc11.i586
-audacity-1.3.10-0.2.beta.fc11.i586
+audacity-1.3.11-0.1.beta.fc11.i586
+batterymon-1.2.4-1.fc11.noarch
-bind-libs-9.6.1-7.P2.fc11.i586
+bind-libs-9.6.1-9.P3.fc11.i586
-bind-utils-9.6.1-7.P2.fc11.i586
+bind-utils-9.6.1-9.P3.fc11.i586
-bootfw-q3a26-1.unsigned.i386
+bootfw-q3a31-1.unsigned.i386
-coreutils-7.2-5.fc11.i586
+coreutils-7.2-7.fc11.i586
-e2fsprogs-1.41.4-12.fc11.i586
+e2fsprogs-1.41.9-2.fc11.i586
-e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.4-12.fc11.i586
+e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.9-2.fc11.i586
-elfutils-libelf-0.142-1.fc11.i586
+elfutils-libelf-0.144-1.fc11.i586
-gtk-nodoka-engine-0.7.2-5.fc11.i586
+gtk-nodoka-engine-0.7.2-8.fc11.i586
+gzip-1.3.12-10.fc11.i586
-gzip-1.3.12-9.fc11.i586
-iw-0.9.17-3.fc11.i586
+iw-0.9.19-1.fc11.i586
-kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20100108.1640.1.olpc.846ed3a.i586
+kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20100125.1340.1.olpc.a467590.i586
-kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20100108.1640.1.olpc.846ed3a.i586
+kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20100125.1340.1.olpc.a467590.i586
-krb5-libs-1.6.3-20.fc11.i586
+krb5-libs-1.6.3-23.fc11.i586
-krb5-workstation-1.6.3-20.fc11.i586
+krb5-workstation-1.6.3-23.fc11.i586
-libpurple-2.6.4-1.fc11.i586
+libpurple-2.6.5-1.fc11.i586
-libssh2-1.0-2.fc11.i586
+libssh2-1.2.2-5.fc11.i586
-mobile-broadband-provider-info-1.20090918-1.fc11.noarch
+mobile-broadband-provider-info-1.20100122-1.fc11.noarch
+notify-python-0.1.1-7.fc11.i586
-ntfs-3g-2009.11.14-2.fc11.i586
+ntfs-3g-2010.1.16-1.fc11.i586
-olpc-kbdshim-10-1.20091229gitcd6f984.fc11.i586
+olpc-kbdshim-11-1.20100120gitf4be89a.fc11.i586
-olpc-utils-1.0.16-1.fc11.i586
+olpc-utils-1.0.17-1.fc11.i586
-openldap-2.4.15-6.fc11.i586
+openldap-2.4.15-7.fc11.i586
-pciutils-3.1.4-3.fc11.i586
+pciutils-3.1.6-1.fc11.i586
-pciutils-libs-3.1.4-3.fc11.i586
+pciutils-libs-3.1.6-1.fc11.i586
-ppp-2.4.4-11.fc11.i586
+ppp-2.4.4-12.fc11.i586
-sos-1.8-18.fc11.noarch
+sos-1.8-21.fc11.noarch
14 years, 2 months
Re: [Sugar-devel] Serious screen distortion using firefox 3.5 and 3.6
by Tomeu Vizoso
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:24, Bryan Berry <bryan(a)olenepal.org> wrote:
> I run firefox 3.6 and 3.5 on gnome on my desktop w/ no such issue.
> I should try SoaS and see if I have the same problem. Can u recommend a
> particular SoAS release for me to test?
> I fear that firefox now runs some of the rendering in a separate thread, one
> that gets starved on the XO's limited single-core CPU
Hmm, I still think that doing the test on firefox on gnome on xo1
would tell us quite a bit. Maybe one of the people testing the f11
builds would like to give it a try? I'm cc'ing fedora-olpc and OLPC's
devel ml.
I would expect you to find the same bug on SoaS-on-XO1.
Regards,
Tomeu
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu(a)sugarlabs.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 07:01, Bryan Berry <bryan(a)olenepal.org> wrote:
>> > I have tested firefox 3.5 and 3.6 on the XO with Sugar version
>> > sugar-0.81.7-1.
>> > I see significant distortion of png images
>> > I also had this issue w/ os10 (0.84? 0.86?)
>>
>> I think os10 also has gnome, can you see if firefox on gnome also has
>> this problem?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tomeu
>>
>> > http://dev.laptop.org/~smparrish/XO-1/builds/OS10/
>> > http://trac.sugarlabs.org/attachment/ticket/1689/firefox-3-6-blur1.png
>> > http://trac.sugarlabs.org/attachment/ticket/1689/firefox-3-6-blur2.png
>> > http://trac.sugarlabs.org/attachment/ticket/1689/karma-template1.png
>> > I have already created a ticket on the issue
>> > http://trac.sugarlabs.org/attachment/ticket/1689
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Sugar-devel mailing list
>> > Sugar-devel(a)lists.sugarlabs.org
>> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>> >
>> >
>
>
14 years, 2 months
New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 108
by Chris Ball
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5
http://build.laptop.org/10.2.0/os108
Compressed image size: 704.70mb (+2.12mb since build 107)
Description of changes in this build:
* run prelink during the build process, disable it afterwards (#9947)
Package changes since build 107:
-ImageMagick-6.5.1.2-1.fc11.i586
+ImageMagick-6.5.1.2-2.fc11.i586
-ImageMagick-c++-6.5.1.2-1.fc11.i586
+ImageMagick-c++-6.5.1.2-2.fc11.i586
-acl-2.2.47-4.fc11.i586
+acl-2.2.49-2.fc11.i586
-ghostscript-8.70-1.fc11.i586
+ghostscript-8.70-2.fc11.i586
-libacl-2.2.47-4.fc11.i586
+libacl-2.2.49-2.fc11.i586
-nss-3.12.4-3.fc11.i586
+nss-3.12.5-3.fc11.i586
-nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.4-3.fc11.i586
+nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.5-3.fc11.i586
-tzdata-2009o-2.fc11.noarch
+tzdata-2009u-1.fc11.noarch
-wpa_supplicant-0.6.8-6.fc11.i586
+wpa_supplicant-0.6.8-8.fc11.i586
14 years, 2 months
Fw: Re: kernel memory leak
by Yioryos Asprobounitis
--- On Tue, 1/19/10, Yioryos Asprobounitis <mavrothal(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> From: Yioryos Asprobounitis <mavrothal(a)yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: kernel memory leak
> To: "James Cameron" <quozl(a)laptop.org>
> Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 7:40 AM
>
>
> --- On Tue, 1/19/10, James Cameron <quozl(a)laptop.org>
> wrote:
>
> > From: James Cameron <quozl(a)laptop.org>
> > Subject: Re: kernel memory leak
> > To: "Yioryos Asprobounitis" <mavrothal(a)yahoo.com>
> > Cc: "fedora-olpc-list" <fedora-olpc-list(a)redhat.com>,
> "OLPC Devel" <devel(a)lists.laptop.org>
> > Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2010, 4:29 AM
> > Just confirming, by "leak" you mean
> > that the kernel consumes more memory
> > than the earlier kernel after boot?
>
> Correct
>
> >
> > "leak" normally means you keep losing memory during
> > operation.
>
> Sorry
>
> >
> > Is there a ticket in trac for this?
> > dev.laptop.org. There was no
> > mention of it in the RH BZ #487601.
>
> When mentioned in the past in these lists the response was
> "it's upstreamed". So, no. No ticket in track.
There is one now #9989
>
> >
> > --
> > James Cameron
> > http://quozl.linux.org.au/
> >
>
>
>
>
14 years, 3 months
