February 2009 - olpc - Fedora Mailing-Lists

buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on log-activity-Fedora10

by buildbot＠sugarlabs.org

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of log-activity-Fedora10 on Sugar Labs Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/log-activity-Fedora10/builds/74 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ Buildslave for this Build: Fedora10 Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blamelist: BUILD FAILED: failed log-activity update sincerely, -The Buildbot

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on GConf-dbus-Fedora10

by buildbot＠sugarlabs.org

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of GConf-dbus-Fedora10 on Sugar Labs Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/GConf-dbus-Fedora10/builds/81 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ Buildslave for this Build: Fedora10 Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blamelist: BUILD FAILED: failed GConf-dbus build sincerely, -The Buildbot

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on log-activity-Fedora10

by buildbot＠sugarlabs.org

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of log-activity-Fedora10 on Sugar Labs Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/log-activity-Fedora10/builds/73 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ Buildslave for this Build: Fedora10 Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blamelist: BUILD FAILED: failed log-activity update sincerely, -The Buildbot

15 years, 2 months

3
2
0 / 0

buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on log-activity-Ubuntu804

by buildbot＠sugarlabs.org

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of log-activity-Ubuntu804 on Sugar Labs Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/log-activity-Ubuntu804/builds/4 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ Buildslave for this Build: Ubuntu804 Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blamelist: BUILD FAILED: failed log-activity update sincerely, -The Buildbot

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on log-activity-Fedora-Rawhide

by buildbot＠sugarlabs.org

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of log-activity-Fedora-Rawhide on Sugar Labs Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/log-activity-Fedora-Rawhide/builds/66 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ Buildslave for this Build: Fedora-Rawhide Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blamelist: BUILD FAILED: failed log-activity update sincerely, -The Buildbot

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on GConf-dbus-Fedora10

by buildbot＠sugarlabs.org

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of GConf-dbus-Fedora10 on Sugar Labs Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/GConf-dbus-Fedora10/builds/80 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ Buildslave for this Build: Fedora10 Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blamelist: BUILD FAILED: failed GConf-dbus build sincerely, -The Buildbot

15 years, 2 months

2
1
0 / 0

Fwd: Help debug latest rawhide images

by Mathieu Bridon

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) <bochecha(a)fedoraproject.org> Date: Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:01 PM Subject: Re: Help debug latest rawhide images To: Greg Dekoenigsberg <gdk(a)redhat.com> Hi, > In lieu of an actual meeting... Chris Ball will be publishing the url for a > rawhide-based iso image suitable for burning to USB key later today. Sorry, I couldn't be online yesterday, so I didn't get this URL. Could someone send it again ? > Everyone with XOs: *please* burn and try to boot from USB using this image. > Help us debug boot failures, either on-list or in #fedora-olpc. This is > pretty much the critical path. Help if you can. Will do tonight and / or this week end. --------------------------------------------------- Oops, sent only to Greg instead of the whole list. Sorry for the inconvenience... :-/ ---------- Mathieu Bridon (bochecha) French Fedora Ambassador ---------- "They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~Benjamin Franklin

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

buildbot failure in Sugar Labs Buildbot on GConf-dbus-Fedora10

by buildbot＠sugarlabs.org

The Buildbot has detected a failed build of GConf-dbus-Fedora10 on Sugar Labs Buildbot. Full details are available at: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/GConf-dbus-Fedora10/builds/79 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/ Buildslave for this Build: Fedora10 Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: HEAD Blamelist: BUILD FAILED: failed GConf-dbus build sincerely, -The Buildbot

15 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

Meeting status tomorrow: unsure.

by Greg DeKoenigsberg

All right. We are *supposed* to have a meeting scheduled for tomorrow at 1300 Eastern US time, which is 1800 UTC. #fedora-olpc on freenode. However, I'm a bit nervous about the prospect of wasting people's time. Here's the thing, and it pains me to admit it: I'm not sure where we are, exactly. I've had a good bit less official job time to devote to this effort lately, and our current status is a bit of a mystery to me. Here's what I think I know: * We've got lots of packages queued up for acceptance into F-11, and SMParrish has been reviewing new stuff like mad. Yay! * Marco tracked down the weird boot issues with rawhide and the XO, and those should now be fixed. Yay! * People are tackling individual issues as they find them. Yay! All of this is great. However: * It's still unclear to me which packages in dist-olpc4 are building because they have to build, and which have simply not been untagged; * It's still unclear to me which necessary packages are still sitting in joyride and have yet to be brought into rawhide; * The process for keeping track of all of this is currently in poor shape, which is, admittedly, my fault. So I'd like to step back and ask a question. Since the goal is to create a bootable build of F-11 on the XO -- how is that process going? I know there have been discussions; where are we, right now, with this process? I'm wondering if it might not be the best idea, at this point, to go ahead and start working backwards from rawhide, and see what's busted, and start tracking that in bugzilla. I welcome people's thoughts. --g -- Got an XO that you're not using? Loan it to a needy developer! [[ http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO_Exchange_Registry ]]

15 years, 2 months

4
6
0 / 0

Build intrastructure

by Bernie Innocenti

[cc += sugar-devel@] Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: >> As Peter suggested, I should look at getting nightly builds set up soon. >> Would you like to share infrastructure so that the build run spits out >> SoaS images at the same as F11-XO images? If so, any preference for >> whether to do it on an OLPC machine or on something like sunjammer? > > Sharing infra on this makes a lot of sense to me. Personally I have no > preference about where to host it. Bernie, what do you think? Is this > something we can host? I guess we will need a rawhide box/VM. We can provide shell accounts on our buildslaves to anyone interested in running nightly builds. We currently have 4 of them: buildslave1.sugarlabs.org Fedora 10 x86_64 buildslave2.sugarlabs.org Fedora rawhide x86_64 buildslave3.sugarlabs.org OFFLINE buildslave4.sugarlabs.org Ubuntu 8.10 Please, avoid using your shell accounts on sunjammer for heavy-duty jobs such as daily rebuilds. If you must, at least run these things with "nice -n 15 ionice -n 5 -c 3" to keep it from slowing down other users too much. Please also avoid using shell accounts on solarsail and trinity as we're going to phase them out at some point. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/

15 years, 3 months

2
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

olpc February 2009