New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 122

[Chris Ball]

http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5
http://build.laptop.org/10.2.0/os122

Compressed image size: 677.68mb (-0.70mb since build 121)

Description of changes in this build:
 * kernel, #10137: correct camera framerate setting (note, this version
                   of the patch may break the camera fps on XO-1)
 * record, #10045: Fix sync issues by moving to dsd's Record-74.
 * olpc-runin-tests: update from rsmith
 * olpc-powerd, #10129: fix a bug that could cause unwanted idle-suspend
 * olpc-update: fix param order for check_stolen_hash()
 * Upgrade to firmware Q3A37.
 * Pull F11 updates.

Package changes since build 121:

-bootfw-q3a36-1.unsigned.i386
+bootfw-q3a37-1.unsigned.i386
-kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20100423.1840.1.olpc.2884b56.i586
+kernel-2.6.31_xo1.5-20100430.1441.1.olpc.6a2d568.i586
-kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20100423.1840.1.olpc.2884b56.i586
+kernel-firmware-2.6.31_xo1.5-20100430.1441.1.olpc.6a2d568.i586
-olpc-powerd-19-1.fc11.i586
+olpc-powerd-20-1.fc11.i586
-olpc-runin-tests-0.9.17-1.noarch
+olpc-runin-tests-0.9.18-1.noarch
-olpc-update-2.22-1.fc11.noarch
+olpc-update-2.23-1.fc11.noarch
-wxBase-2.8.10-5.fc11.i586
+wxBase-2.8.11-1.fc11.i586
-wxGTK-2.8.10-5.fc11.i586
+wxGTK-2.8.11-1.fc11.i586

[Yioryos Asprobounitis]

--- On Sat, 5/1/10, Chris Ball  wrote:
> From: Chris Ball 
> Subject: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 122
> To: "Fedora OLPC" 
> Cc: "Devel" 
> Date: Saturday, May 1, 2010, 9:38 PM
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5
> http://build.laptop.org/10.2.0/os122
>
> Compressed image size: 677.68mb (-0.70mb since build 121)
>
> Description of changes in this build:
> kernel, #10137: correct camera framerate setting (note,
>
> this version
>                
>    of the patch may break the camera fps on
> XO-1)
> record, #10045: Fix sync issues by moving to dsd's
>
> Record-74.

Is this a typo?
I had installed Record-76 from http://activities.sugarlabs.org/en-US/sugar/addons/versions/4081#version-76 under os121 and "olpc-update" to 122, so I'm not sure.

In any case, Record-76 is _way_ better than Record 64-67 on the XO-1.5, in video quality and processing speed.

The only issue I have under both os 121 and 122, is that the recorded video has about a second of scramble images in the beginning.
Another minor issue is that during recording the displayed image is jerky, though playback is fine. 
Finally sound level recording appears to be low in video recording though in audio recording is better(?)
Overall the best Record activity I've seen on the XO post-os802 and definitively usable.

With this I would think that XO-1.5 software is deployment ready :-)

BTW I could see no difference in Record-76 performance in os121 vs os122.

[James Cameron]

On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 11:50:39PM -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
> --- On Sat, 5/1/10, Chris Ball  wrote:
> > record, #10045: Fix sync issues by moving to dsd's Record-74.
>
> Is this a typo?

Yes.

The activity version number of Record on os122 is -76.

Reference:

http://build.laptop.org/10.1.1/os122/os122.activities.txt