Thanks guys.
When I began the article it was intended to be about how good "Live"
Flash/SD installations work under linux, and the "random list" was
actually a list of the best performing Live Persistent distributions
we've had the privileged of putting on Flash Drives. But I was also
wanting to throw Fedora at the top of the list for the effort with the
F10/XO...so I basically chunked it in at the beginning and end.
Anyway, I've updated the short article with the
sugarlab.org info,
inserted a missing heading, and re-arranged the "random list" which
helped clean it up.
Thanks again!
~Todd
Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Rahul Sundaram
<sundaram(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Also, a random list of linux distributions at the end doesn't work very well
> in a article about Fedora and OLPC. If you want to, you can highlight other
> Linux distributions with OLPC focus.
>
Agreed. And the good list of those is here :-)
http://sugarlabs.org/go/Supported_systems
cheers,
m