On 06/27/2013 10:11 AM, Jan Safranek wrote:
On 06/25/2013 04:56 PM, Jan Safranek wrote:
Alternatively, we can create libpyCmpiLMI_Software.so and libpyCmpiLMI_Storage.so as symlinks to libpyCmpiProvider.so. In this case, we just need to change our registration files and package the new symlinks. Is it acceptable solution?
If there are no objections, I'll add attached README.SELinux to cmpi-providers-pywbem.rpm and implement suggested adjustments in next release of openlmi-storage.rpm.
All changes are Fedora downstream only, upstream is not affected.
Argh, scratch all this, I had misconfigured Pegasus. Pegasus passes PG_ProviderModule.ModuleGroupName to cimprovagt, which is different for OpenLMI storage and software providers, therefore no magic symlinks are needed.
Jan