Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248
------- Additional Comments From mclasen(a)redhat.com 2007-08-06 19:59 EST -------
Initial comments:
- I second Lennarts comment about maemo - is it useful to package that plugin
without any other part of maemo in fedora ?
- OSSO DSP SW <--> ALSA DSP plugin
========================
Don't put ascii formatting into the %description, please.
- BuildRequires are per source package, there is no reason to put them
into the subpackage sections (of course, it doesn't hurt either)
- Requires: alsa-lib
is unnecessary, since library dependencies pull it in anyway
- The license tag needs some work; GPL is no longer a valid value for
that field, it should probably be GPLv2+. But some of the plugins
appear to be LGPLv2+, so maybe it would be better to put license
tags in the subpackages according to their actual licenses. In fact,
all but the samplerate plugin appear to be LGPL, not GPL.
- What is the touching in %prep about ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248
mclasen(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|POST |ASSIGNED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248
mclasen(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|stransky(a)redhat.com |mclasen(a)redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From mclasen(a)redhat.com 2007-08-06 16:33 EST -------
Ok, I'm going to take this review over, since nobody else seems to be serious
about this. We really want alsa-plugins-pulseaudio in F8...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: alsa-plugins - backend plugins for alsa sound system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222248
------- Additional Comments From lpoetter(a)redhat.com 2007-08-06 16:23 EST -------
Hmm, why this -maemo package? Has anyone ported Fedora to the N800 now?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240693
Summary: Review Request: <main package name here> - Reverse-proxy
load balancer and webserver
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: ruben(a)rubenkerkhof.com
QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Spec URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/Perlbal.spec
SRPM URL: http://rubenkerkhof.com/packages/Perlbal-1.58-1.src.rpm
Description:
Perlbal is a single-threaded event-based server supporting HTTP load
balancing, web serving, and a mix of the two. Perlbal can act as either a web
server or a reverse proxy.
One of the defining things about Perlbal is that almost everything can be
configured or reconfigured on the fly without needing to restart the software.
A basic configuration file containing a management port enables you to easily
perform operations on a running instance of Perlbal.
Perlbal can also be extended by means of per-service (and global) plugins that
can override many parts of request handling and behavior.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199405
Summary: Review Request: vtk - The Visualization Toolkit - A high
level 3D visualization library
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info
ReportedBy: Axel.Thimm(a)ATrpms.net
QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtk.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/fedorasubmit/vtk/vtk-5.0.1-8.at.src.rpm
Description:
VTK is an open-source software system for image processing, 3D
graphics, volume rendering and visualization. VTK includes many
advanced algorithms (e.g., surface reconstruction, implicit modelling,
decimation) and rendering techniques (e.g., hardware-accelerated
volume rendering, LOD control).
Expected rpmlint output:
o E: vtk-* script-without-shellbang *.cmake
I'm not sure why rpmlint detects cmake files as scripts.
o E: * zero-length */hints
That's inherited from the upstream sources. Maybe having an empty hints file
is needed, but I will ask upstream. Keeping it for now.
o E: vtk-testing.* script-without-shellbang .*tcl
Is it worth fixing this?
o W: vtk-devel unstripped-binary-or-object <wrapper dirs>/*.so
debuginfo processing missed this as these are place in non-standard folders.
Manually strip and have only half a debuginfo worth of symbols, hack into
debuginfo generation, or maybe simply allow these devel files to carry the
symbols?
o wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding on an windows file in the examples doc.
The examples contain a couple of non-Linux parts, but I don't want to castrate
them. Maybe someone will develop on several archs.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249590
Summary: Review Request: and - Auto nice daemon
Product: Fedora
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/and/and.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/and/and-1.2.2-1.src.rpm
Description:
The auto nice daemon renices and even kills jobs according to their CPU time,
owner, and command name. This is especially useful on production machines with
lots of concurrent CPU-intensive jobs and users that tend to forget to
nice their jobs.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=249996
Summary: Review Request: perl-File-chmod - perl module
implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes
Product: Fedora
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: rc040203(a)freenet.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-File-chmod.spec
SRPM URL: http://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-File-chmod-0.32-1.fc8.src.rpm
Description: Perl dist implementing symbolic and ls chmod modes
This perl-module is a prerequisite to be able to upgrade perl-Test-Inline.
Special thanks to J. Pinyan (File::chmod maintainer),
M. Schwern and A. Kennedy (Test::Inline maintainers)
for having changed File::chmod's licensing upon request,
remarkably fast in a way, such that File::chmod now can be
shipped with Fedora. Thank you, guys!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229591
Summary: Review Request: lshw - Hardware Lister (lshw)
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: patrick.pichon(a)laposte.net
QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Spec URL: http://ezix.org/software/files/lshw-B.02.10.tar.gz
SRPM URL: http://ezix.org/software/files/lshw-B.02.10.tar.gz
Description: lshw (Hardware Lister) is a small tool to provide detailed information on the hardware configuration of the machine. It can report exact memory configuration, firmware version, mainboard configuration, CPU version and speed, cache configuration, bus speed, etc. on DMI-capable x86 or EFI (IA-64) systems and on some PowerPC machines
PS/ I have found that tools very useful and already available on various distribution
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248231
Summary: Review Request: ustr - String library, very low memory
overhead, simple to import
Product: Fedora
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: james.antill(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jantill/fedora/ustr-1.0.0-2.fc7.src.rpm
Description:
Hi, I already have a couple of packages, so hopefully this shouldn't be too bad :).
rpmlint gives a couple of warnings, but they should be ignored AIUI.
Micro string library, very low overhead from plain strdup() (Ave. 44% for
0-20B strings). Very easy to use in existing C code. At it's simplest you can
just include a single header file into your .c and start using it.
This package also distributes pre-built shared libraries.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.