Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
Summary: Review Request: jike - Java source to bytecode compiler Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/jikes.spec SRPM URL: http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/jikes-1.22-1.src.rpm Description:
The IBM Jikes compiler translates Java source files to bytecode. It also supports incremental compilation and automatic makefile generation, and is maintained by the Jikes Project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jike - Java source to bytecode compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
------- Additional Comments From gemi@bluewin.ch 2006-10-22 09:47 EST ------- Jikes is already in Extras.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
ville.skytta@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: jike - Java |Review Request: jikes - Java |source to bytecode compiler |source to bytecode compiler
------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta@iki.fi 2006-10-22 11:55 EST ------- Yes, OTOH orphaned and already dropped from the devel repo.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-10-22 15:05 EST ------- #1 : I couldn't see it, which is why I've put it up for review
#2 : Could you give it the once over and I'll adopt it?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
gemi@bluewin.ch changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |gemi@bluewin.ch
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
gemi@bluewin.ch changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From gemi@bluewin.ch 2006-10-23 15:54 EST ------- * Summary must start with uppercase * The URL is now jikes.sourceforge.net * Both descriptions must end with a period * The installation of the man page is wrong -> no star wildcard * There must be a "rm -rf %{buildroot}" at the beginning of the %install section * The release number of the current FC5 rpm is 5, so make it at least 6
I wonder what the jikesapi.h header can be used for...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta@iki.fi 2006-10-23 16:09 EST ------- I'd suggest just unorphaning the current jikes package from FE CVS (FC-5 branch) as usual instead of rewriting everything from scratch. It's in a good shape (IIRC, I used to maintain it ;)) and has some post-upstream-1.22 bugfixes that are important to some users.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
------- Additional Comments From gemi@bluewin.ch 2006-10-23 17:13 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5)
I'd suggest just unorphaning the current jikes package from FE CVS (FC-5 branch) as usual instead of rewriting everything from scratch. It's in a good shape (IIRC, I used to maintain it ;))
In that case, maybe you should take over the review.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
------- Additional Comments From ville.skytta@iki.fi 2006-10-23 17:24 EST ------- I don't think the package currently in CVS needs a (re-)review, the usual unorphan process should work just fine for it, and this bug could be closed as WONTFIX. But maybe that's just me...
OTOH, if the package in CVS does need a re-review, it wouldn't make much sense for me to review it, being blind to one's own bugs etc.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
------- Additional Comments From gemi@bluewin.ch 2006-11-12 17:09 EST ------- Paul, would you submit the original src rpm? I will look it over quickly.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-11-12 17:59 EST ------- Do you mean the version that is in CVS or the one you can find at http://nodoid.homelinux.org/fedora/srpms.shtml ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
ville.skytta@iki.fi changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |149781
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
------- Additional Comments From gemi@bluewin.ch 2007-02-24 09:20 EST ------- I would say the one from CVS, since it contains some patches.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora Version|devel |rawhide
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 | nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2008-01-19 18:56 EST ------- It's been eleven months since the last comment; is anyone still working on this?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
------- Additional Comments From gemi@bluewin.ch 2008-02-22 18:46 EST ------- I am no longer interested in reviewing this. Is anyone else?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
gemi@bluewin.ch changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |notting@redhat.com, fedora- | |package-review@redhat.com AssignedTo|gemi@bluewin.ch |nobody@fedoraproject.org Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO QAContact|fedora-package- |extras-qa@fedoraproject.org |review@redhat.com | Flag| |needinfo?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: jikes - Java source to bytecode compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
jonstanley@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonstanley@gmail.com Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo? |
Bug 211763 depends on bug 149781, which changed state.
Bug 149781 Summary: array subscript out of range https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=149781
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA
------- Additional Comments From jonstanley@gmail.com 2008-05-15 00:33 EST ------- FWIW, it looks like the FC-5 branch still builds:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=610129
It does need a full review per the process I think for reviving it. Paul, are you still interested in this?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |cchance@redhat.com Resolution| |NOTABUG
--- Comment #14 from Caius "kaio" Chance cchance@redhat.com 2009-02-17 01:02:15 EDT --- Address Not Found for the srpm url.
Please reopen if anyone interested to have this review again.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211763
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org