Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: samefile - An utility to find identical files on the file system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871
Summary: Review Request: samefile - An utility to find identical files on the file system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: boni.vivek@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/samefile.spec SRPM URL: http://rishi.fedorapeople.org/samefile-2.12-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: The samefile utility finds files with identical contents, independent of file name. This program is for you if you are notoriously low on disk space, keep exceeding your disk quota, pay for your storage by the megabyte, run any kind of file server, need to reduce the size of your backups, or just want to get a feeling for how much redundant files are there on your system.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871
--- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pandit@gmail.com 2008-08-23 14:29:48 EDT --- This is an unofficial quick review(as I am not a sponsor) to help this package: 1. You should add
%check make test
to use test cases provided. 2. Confirm from upstream about license. From project page it looks to be BSD. But it is always good to verify. 3. Optional Suggestion: You may like to remove macros from URL.
+rpmlint clean +Build on mock -- successfully +summary -- okay +description -- okay +build root -- okay I give priority to this: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX)
+md5sum source from package: 5e51411512f693897f9cfd59c45071f7 from project resource: 5e51411512f693897f9cfd59c45071f7
- license tag correct, few source files (i confirm 1+)src files have license txt included but most of them don't have. So, you may like to confirm it from upstream. +package naming +spec file & base package name match +macros used consistently, sane spec file +compiler flags are appropriate -you may like to request including a license file to upstream, though this is optional here -- moreover only few src files have license block. +You may also like to contact upstream about you being packaging for fedora and they may -- once passed update there project page. Right now they have point to different RPMs (third party may be)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871
--- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pandit@gmail.com 2008-08-23 14:36:36 EDT --- You should add FE-NEEDSPONSOR to 'Blocks' field, so that sponsors will notice your ticket and do read: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871
--- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-08-25 01:15:14 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR: bug 458624)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871
--- Comment #4 from vivek shah boni.vivek@gmail.com 2008-08-25 09:35:44 EDT --- Thanks for the reviews, I have updated the %check section and also added the ChangeLog file
SPEC URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/samefile.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/samefile-2.12-2.fc8.src.rpm
The license is BSD since this is the license specified in the spec file for creating the rpm for OpenSUSE distribution by the upstream author which is also included in the source tar.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871
Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pandit@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |rakesh.pandit@gmail.com
--- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pandit@gmail.com 2008-08-25 11:35:21 EDT --- I will do a detailed review today or at least tomorrow ;-)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871
--- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pandit@gmail.com 2008-09-03 09:22:55 EDT ---
[ APPROVED ]
rpmlint is clean
rp => rpmlint [rakesh@thulsadoom SRPMS]$ rp samefile-2.12-2.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[rakesh@thulsadoom x86_64]$ rp samefile-2.12-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[rakesh@thulsadoom x86_64]$ rp samefile-debuginfo-2.12-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Required: [x] Name (in accordance guidelines) [x] spec file name [x] License approved by fedora [x] Spec file is in American Eng and legible [x] Build successfully [x] BuildRequires okay [x] Duplicate files - nil [NA] locale [x] permissions -- okay [x] source link correct [x] packaging guidlines [x] Buildroot correct [x] owns every directory it creates [x] file encoding - checked [x] package has no dependency on files in %doc [NA] gui [x] No dependencies outside FHS guidelines [!] Source0 URL is wrong. It should be http://www.schweikhardt.net/%%7Bname%7D-%%7Bversion%7D.tar.gz . Without www it does not work. [x] md5sum
Source from srpm: [rakesh@thulsadoom x86_64]$ md5sum samefile-2.12.tar.gz 5e51411512f693897f9cfd59c45071f7 Using Source0 as http://www.schweikhardt.net/%%7Bname%7D-%%7Bversion%7D.tar.gz [rakesh@thulsadoom samefile]$ md5sum samefile-2.12.tar.gz 5e51411512f693897f9cfd59c45071f7
md5sum matches
[x] unnecessary files excluded [x] native compiler test [NA] devel package contains right files
Optional suggestions: [!] request upstream to include license file. [!] Include ChangeLog (it has important info)
*You may like to ignore them*
Key NA = N/A, x = Check, ! = Problem, ? = Not evaluated
Please correct URL before importing. You may also like to look at optional suggestions.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871
--- Comment #7 from vivek shah boni.vivek@gmail.com 2008-09-03 09:40:15 EDT --- Thanks for the review, I will look into the SOURCE0 URL and fix it if it is not working without www.
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: samefile Short Description: An utility to find identical files on the file system Owners: bonii Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871
--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2008-09-03 16:23:04 EDT --- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2008-09-05 09:08:16 EDT --- samefile-2.12-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/samefile-2.12-3.fc9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2008-09-05 09:08:20 EDT --- samefile-2.12-3.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/samefile-2.12-3.fc8
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871
Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pandit@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871
Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pandit@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--- Comment #11 from Rakesh Pandit rakesh.pandit@gmail.com 2008-09-10 02:52:19 EDT --- It has been submitted as an update.
I am closing it as 'NEXTRELEASE'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2008-09-24 19:59:14 EDT --- samefile-2.12-3.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2008-09-24 20:00:19 EDT --- samefile-2.12-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871
Dmitry Butskoy dmitry@butskoy.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmitry@butskoy.name Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #14 from Dmitry Butskoy dmitry@butskoy.name 2012-02-13 06:59:20 EST --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: samefile New Branches: el6 Owners: buc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459871
--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com 2012-02-13 09:51:12 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org