Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
Summary: Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matt_domsch@dell.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Spec URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/gpxe/gpxe.spec SRPM URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/gpxe/gpxe-0.9.7-1.git16aa435.fc10.src.rpm Description: gPXE is an open source network bootloader. It provides a direct replacement for proprietary PXE ROMs, with many extra features such as DNS, HTTP, iSCSI, etc.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |457979
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar@ispbrasil.com.br
--- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-03-25 15:04:46 EDT --- I have a question,
this package will obsolete etherboot ?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6998
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #2 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa gcosta@redhat.com 2009-03-25 15:24:45 EDT --- Yes, sir. Provided everything moves according to the plan.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #3 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa gcosta@redhat.com 2009-03-25 15:29:57 EDT --- 1: Now that we don't have a kvm package anymore, the subpackage should be really called roms-qemu, not roms-kvm
2: Why git? Doesn't gpxe have a fresh enough release?
3: ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 => this is wrong. It means ppc and others will never get the noarch subpackages. Take a look on how extboot does it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #4 from Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com 2009-03-25 16:02:24 EDT --- 1) good catch, will change 2) upstream doesn't release tarballs. I'm OK using the v0.9.7 tag if we don't need any diffs since then. 3) will investigate
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #5 from Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com 2009-03-25 17:00:43 EDT --- Updated files with changes suggested in comment #3. http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/gpxe/gpxe.spec http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/gpxe/gpxe-0.9.7-1.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #6 from Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com 2009-03-26 12:01:48 EDT --- And a few more updates: * add subpackage gpxe-bootimgs containing ISO, USB, and floppy images * add BRs needed for generating the above images * add USAGE doc for above images * change Source0 to point at released tarballs, not git
Built in mock, logs and results at http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/gpxe/.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-03-26 12:25:04 EDT --- why you don't include dist-tag ?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-03-26 12:27:16 EDT --- Can you include a koji scratch build in dist-f11 ?
-make %{?_smp_mflags} +make %{?_smp_mflags} ISOLINUX_BIN=/usr/share/syslinux/isolinux.bin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #9 from Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com 2009-03-26 12:52:42 EDT --- Itamar: re no dist tag: the executables being produced run in BIOS context, not OS distribution context. There's no reason we couldn't use the same noarch (x86) executables across multiple OS versions.
Koji scratch-build started: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1259845
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #10 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-03-26 12:58:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=336850) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=336850) patch to build in koji
look
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #11 from Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com 2009-03-26 13:18:16 EDT --- Gotcha. Applied those changes, thanks! http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1259897 built successfully.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2009-04-01 18:06:15 EDT --- Where's the latest package with those changes applied? I only see the 0.9.7-1 spec from comment #5.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #13 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-04-01 18:16:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12)
Where's the latest package with those changes applied? I only see the 0.9.7-1 spec from comment #5.
I belive in koji, until the next cleanup.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #14 from Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com 2009-04-06 10:57:13 EDT --- I'm uploading the spec and srpm which match the last koji scratch build, into http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/gpxe/
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
srinivas srinivas_ramanatha@dell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |needinfo?(matt_domsch@dell. | |com)
--- Comment #15 from srinivas srinivas_ramanatha@dell.com 2009-04-07 08:07:20 EDT --- Review:
Fix all rpmlint warnings:
[root@localhost ~]# rpmlint gpxe-* gpxe.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 10) gpxe-bootimgs.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - bootable USB, CD, floppy images and GRUB format gpxe-roms.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - boot roms in .rom format gpxe-roms-qemu.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - boot roms supported by QEMU, .rom format
naming: ok spec file name matches: ok license = GPLv2 and BSD: ok license tag: ok spec in english: ok spec legible: ok no prebuild binaries: ok no packager, vendor, copyright, tags: ok summary and description tags: ok no rpaths: ok no config files: ok no initscripts: ok no desktop files: ok consistent use of macros: ok no makeinstall: ok no lang files: ok scriptlets: ok no conditional deps: ok builds with a normal user account: ok not relocatable: ok code, not content: ok directory ownership: ok users and groups: ok not a web app: ok conflicts: ok no kmods: ok no files under /srv: ok source matches: ok calls ldconfig appropriately: ok no duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok libtool archives removed: ok %clean section: ok no large docs, no need for -doc subpackage: ok %doc usage ok no static libs: ok no pkgconfig files: ok all libtool .la files removed: ok dir ownership correct: ok %install does rm: ok filenames UTF8: ok
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #16 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-04-07 10:18:35 EDT --- look at
comment #1
and
comment #2
may be missing obsolete etherboot
?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(matt_domsch@dell. | |com) |
--- Comment #17 from Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com 2009-04-07 12:28:24 EDT --- I don't know that it obsoletes etherboot in the RPM sense. The two can co-exist, and presumably one could load an etherboot orom into one instance of QEMU, while loading a gPXE orom into another instance. Also, the other etherboot images and gPXE images, meant for use on cards etc, can absolutely co-exist.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #18 from Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com 2009-04-09 18:42:14 EDT --- OK, I fixed the two rpmlint warnings.
$ rpmlint gpxe.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Please approve.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
--- Comment #19 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-04-12 02:31:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18)
you should run rpmlint against rpm files, example
[itamar@itamar gpxe]$ ls *.rpm gpxe-0.9.7-1.src.rpm gpxe-bootimgs-0.9.7-1.noarch.rpm gpxe-roms-0.9.7-1.noarch.rpm gpxe-roms-qemu-0.9.7-1.noarch.rpm
[itamar@itamar gpxe]$ rpmlint *.rpm gpxe.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 10) gpxe-bootimgs.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - bootable USB, CD, floppy images and GRUB format gpxe-roms.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - boot roms in .rom format gpxe-roms-qemu.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - boot roms supported by QEMU, .rom format 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
the warning about summary-not-capitalized can be ignored
so please fix the warning about mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
--- Comment #20 from Itamar Reis Peixoto itamar@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-04-12 02:37:50 EDT --- for the there are something wrong with this package.
since there are no rpms for PPC and PPC64, why not use
ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64
?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #21 from Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com 2009-04-12 12:45:52 EDT --- Honestly folks, we're getting a bit pedantic with the tabs vs spaces warning. I didn't rebuild the RPMs after fixing that just to run rpmlint to prove that I can run 'tr' to remove tabs. Running rpmlint against the spec file is sufficient to see that I fixed those.
Regarding exclusivearch - these ROMs run either on a physical machine where exclusivearch would make sense, or can be run inside QEMU on a completely different arch, where the RPM architecture makes no sense whatsoever (hence they're noarch).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #22 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa gcosta@redhat.com 2009-04-14 08:44:31 EDT --- Of course here are ppc and ppc64 packages. They are just not built there.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
srinivas srinivas_ramanatha@dell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #23 from srinivas srinivas_ramanatha@dell.com 2009-05-08 02:26:22 EDT --- Setting fedora-review flag to "+".
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #24 from Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com 2009-05-08 08:07:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gpxe Short Description: A network boot loader Owners: mdomsch glommer Branches: F-11 F-10 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |srinivas_ramanatha@dell.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2009-05-09 16:50:26 EDT --- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 10:15:27 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 10:15:58 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-3.fc10
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 10:16:34 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA
--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:27:16 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gpxe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4900
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:27:22 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update gpxe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4901
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-12 20:30:07 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gpxe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4920
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
Rolf Fokkens rolf.fokkens@wanadoo.nl changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rolf.fokkens@wanadoo.nl
--- Comment #32 from Rolf Fokkens rolf.fokkens@wanadoo.nl 2009-05-19 17:57:00 EDT --- I needed undionly.kpxe to make a server do an iSCSI boot, as described in http://www.etherboot.org/wiki/pxechaining.
AFAIK this file isn't part if the compiled packages, I took it from the rpmbuild after building the binary packages from sources. I'd suggest to include the undionly.kpxe in one of the binary packages if it actually isn't in one of them.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #33 from Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com 2009-05-19 18:28:01 EDT --- Thanks for catching that Rolf. Building in koji now, with undionly.kpxe now included in the -bootimgs subpackage.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1364843
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-19 19:41:18 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-19 20:24:43 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc10
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-19 20:25:30 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc9
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 19:52:30 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gpxe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5228
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 19:54:49 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gpxe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5243
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-05-20 19:59:24 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update gpxe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-5260
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-02 10:25:43 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.7-4.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-02 10:27:25 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.7-4.fc9 |0.9.7-4.fc10
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
--- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2009-06-15 22:14:20 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.7-4.fc10 |0.9.7-4.fc11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181
Daniel Berrange berrange@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kanarip@kanarip.com
--- Comment #43 from Daniel Berrange berrange@redhat.com 2012-03-19 16:56:59 EDT --- *** Bug 553055 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org