[Bug 351361] New: Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library - package-review

List overview All Threads
Download

newer

[Bug 351361] New: Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library

older

[Bug 432137] New: Review Request:...

[Bug 422841] New: Review Request:...

Red Hat Bugzilla

24 Oct 2007 24 Oct '07

10:12 p.m.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361

Summary: Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Product: Fedora Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: opensource@till.name QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting@redhat.com

Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/X11-extras.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/X11-extras-0.4-1.tillf7.src.rpm Description: Missing bindings to the X11 graphics library.

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Show replies by date

Red Hat Bugzilla

24 Oct 24 Oct

10:15 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: X11-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361

opensource@till.name changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |X11-extras

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Red Hat Bugzilla

10:38 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: X11-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361

------- Additional Comments From pertusus@free.fr 2007-10-24 17:38 EST ------- Shouldn't this be called haskell-X11-extras? The X11-extras is awfully badly chosen and too generic!

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Red Hat Bugzilla

10:50 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: X11-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361

------- Additional Comments From opensource@till.name 2007-10-24 17:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1)

...

Shouldn't this be called haskell-X11-extras? The X11-extras is awfully badly chosen and too generic!

Maybe, but the packages this spec produces use ghc prefixes, so this may be only a problem in CVS, but when the there is a guideline for naming Haskell libraries, then this can be changed without the need of a rebuild. Using haskell as prefix for the packages is not good, because there are different incompatible haskell compilers. Using ghc-X11-extras for the spec may be a solution, but then in case it should contain also other subpackages for other compilers, it would not be good. If you demand a specific name for this package to finish review, then I would prefer to rename it to ghc-X11-extras.

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Red Hat Bugzilla

10:57 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: X11-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361

------- Additional Comments From pertusus@free.fr 2007-10-24 17:57 EST ------- I proposed that name for consistency with perl or python, but I don't have the slightest idea about what is haskell. I can, however, see when a package has a generic naming although it is a binding...

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Red Hat Bugzilla

11:22 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: ghc-X11-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361

opensource@till.name changed:

------- Additional Comments From opensource@till.name 2007-10-24 18:22 EST ------- Here is a spec with the ghc prefix. This spec also uses %ghost in %files instead of rm in %preun

Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11-extras.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11-extras-0.4-2.tillf7.src.rpm

Thinking about it a little more, this is my favourite naming. I hope that someone from the Haskell Sig noticed this review request (I added it to their wiki page), but I will cc them, if it seems, that it is needed. Maybe there will be some Haskell Guidelines, when the review of this package is finished.

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Red Hat Bugzilla

2 Nov 2 Nov

6:48 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: ghc-X11-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361

------- Additional Comments From petersen@redhat.com 2007-11-02 02:48 EST ------- Thanks for submitting X11-extras. :) I had been wanting to have in Fedora for a while.

I Agree the ghc prefix makes sense here.

Currently we don't have any other Haskell compilers in Fedora, though we do have hugs98 (an interpreter) and there could be libraries packaged for it too.

The first library we have (had for a while) is gtk2hs for ghc, but I expect there will surely be more coming. Yes, we need packaging guidelines for Haskell, and I'd like to see this review as a rehearsal to make a draft for that. :)

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Red Hat Bugzilla

13 Nov 13 Nov

7:54 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: ghc-X11-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361

------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan@gmail.com 2007-11-13 02:54 EST ------- Build fails for me with the following:

+ runhaskell Setup.lhs copy --destdir=/home/builder/packages/tmp/ghc-X11-extras-0.4-2.fc8-root-builder Installing: /home/builder/packages/tmp/ghc-X11-extras-0.4-2.fc8-root-builder/usr/lib64/X11-extras-0.4/ghc-6.8.1 + install .installed-pkg-config /home/builder/packages/tmp/ghc-X11-extras-0.4-2.fc8-root-builder/usr/lib64/X11-extras-0.4/ghc-6.8.1/X11-extras.pkg install: cannot stat `.installed-pkg-config': No such file or directory erreur: Mauvais status de sortie pour /home/builder/packages/tmp/rpm-tmp.2795 (%install)

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Red Hat Bugzilla

8:53 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: ghc-X11-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361

------- Additional Comments From opensource@till.name 2007-11-13 03:53 EST ------- Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11-extras.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11-extras-0.4-3.tillf7.src.rpm

Here is a new spec that builds on koji:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=239095 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=239091

I needed to change the way %ghcver was defined because otherwise koji complained about a multiple define package, because it tested %description before the BRs were fulfilled.

(In reply to comment #6)

...

Build fails for me with the following:

runhaskell Setup.lhs copy

--destdir=/home/builder/packages/tmp/ghc-X11-extras-0.4-2.fc8-root-builder Installing:

/home/builder/packages/tmp/ghc-X11-extras-0.4-2.fc8-root-builder/usr/lib64/X11-extras-0.4/ghc-6.8.1

...

install .installed-pkg-config

/home/builder/packages/tmp/ghc-X11-extras-0.4-2.fc8-root-builder/usr/lib64/X11-extras-0.4/ghc-6.8.1/X11-extras.pkg

...

install: cannot stat `.installed-pkg-config': No such file or directory erreur: Mauvais status de sortie pour /home/builder/packages/tmp/rpm-tmp.2795 (%install)

How did you build it? I do not know, why .installed-pkg-config is not there. Is it maybe somewhere else or is there a similiar file in the source directory?

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Red Hat Bugzilla

15 Nov 15 Nov

6:50 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: ghc-X11-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361

------- Additional Comments From michel.sylvan@gmail.com 2007-11-15 13:50 EST ------- Using ghc-6.8.1 from updates-testing, just with rpmbuild.

Something is broken with the way RPM parses macros, by the way, and it's happening here: your commented-out #%define ghc_version in line 2 actually shadows the automatic detection in line 1 (occured to me in the past when trying to comment out %configure in other packages)

Deleting line 2 (or just deleting the %) lets the build proceed, but fails the same way as before -- .installed-pkg-config not found.

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Red Hat Bugzilla

26 Nov 26 Nov

11:44 p.m.

New subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: ghc-X11-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361

------- Additional Comments From opensource@till.name 2007-11-26 18:44 EST ------- Spec URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11-extras.spec SRPM URL: http://till.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-X11-extras-0.4-4.tillf7.src.rpm

Here is a new spec that builds on koji:

F8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=259984 F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=259983

The installed-pkg-config is at a different location when using the newer version of ghc (or cabal)

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Red Hat Bugzilla

12 Dec 12 Dec

9:06 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: ghc-X11-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361

bugzilla@redhat.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|devel |rawhide

rhbugs@n-dimensional.de changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhbugs@n-dimensional.de

------- Additional Comments From rhbugs@n-dimensional.de 2007-12-12 04:06 EST ------- Running rpmlint on the packages built from ghc-X11-extras-0.4-4.tillf7.src.rpm:

ghc681-X11-extras.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/X11-extras-0.4/ghc-6.8.1/libHSX11-extras-0.4.a ghc681-X11-extras.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/X11-extras-0.4/ghc-6.8.1/X11-extras.pkg ghc681-X11-extras.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/X11-extras-0.4/ghc-6.8.1/include/XlibExtras.h ghc-X11-extras.i386: W: no-documentation ghc-X11-extras.i386: E: no-binary

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Red Hat Bugzilla

10:53 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: ghc-X11-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361

------- Additional Comments From opensource@till.name 2007-12-12 05:53 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10)

...

ghc681-X11-extras.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/X11-extras-0.4/ghc-6.8.1/libHSX11-extras-0.4.a

The complete package is a haskell devel package afaik.

...

ghc681-X11-extras.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/X11-extras-0.4/ghc-6.8.1/X11-extras.pkg

Is this file executable? I will check this later.

...

ghc681-X11-extras.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/X11-extras-0.4/ghc-6.8.1/include/XlibExtras.h

see above.

...

ghc-X11-extras.i386: W: no-documentation ghc-X11-extras.i386: E: no-binary

This is also intended, because the package is only there to make it easier to get the latest package.

Nevertheless, it seem that ghc-X11-extras is not needed anymore, at least the latest release of xmonad does not need it, but a newer version of "ghc-X11", but I need to do some more research here - or does someone else know more about this?

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Red Hat Bugzilla

7 Feb 7 Feb

12:14 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: ghc-X11-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361

------- Additional Comments From petersen@redhat.com 2008-02-06 19:14 EST ------- Sorry for neglecting this review too long...

(In reply to comment #11)

...

Nevertheless, it seem that ghc-X11-extras is not needed anymore, at least the latest release of xmonad does not need it, but a newer version of "ghc-X11", but I need to do some more research here

Right I just noticed this myself.

I didn't search the haskell mailing-lists but I see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464004

I think it would be good and straightforward to update your package to X11 instead since ghc-6.8.2 no longer seems to ship X11.

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Red Hat Bugzilla

13 Feb 13 Feb

4:31 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: ghc-X11-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361

petersen@redhat.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED

------- Additional Comments From petersen@redhat.com 2008-02-12 23:31 EST ------- Ah nevermind I see ghc-X11 in bug 426751.

So I think this bug can be closed.

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

Red Hat Bugzilla

5:22 a.m.

New subject: [Bug 351361] Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ghc-X11-extras - Haskell X11-extras library Alias: ghc-X11-extras

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351361

petersen@redhat.com changed:

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

5981

Age (days ago)

6093

Last active (days ago)

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

15 comments

1 participants

tags (0)

participants (1)

Red Hat Bugzilla