Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356
Summary: Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros@phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-package-review@redhat.com,notting@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/bpython/bpython.spec SRPM URL: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/bpython/bpython-0.2.3-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: bpython is a fancy interface to the Python interpreter for Unix-like operating systems. It has the following features: o in-line syntax highlighting o readline-like autocomplete with suggestions displayed as you type o expected parameter list for any Python function. o eewind function to pop the last line of code from memory and re-evaluate. o send the code you've entered off to a pastebin and display the pastebin URL for copying, etc. o save the code you've entered to a file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356
terjeros@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: bpython - |Review Request: bpython - |Fancy Curses Interface To |Fancy Curses Interface To |The Python Interactive |The Python Interactive |Interpreter |Interpreter
------- Additional Comments From terjeros@phys.ntnu.no 2008-04-30 13:06 EST ------- New release upstream, new package:
spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/bpython/bpython.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/bpython/bpython-0.3.1-1.fc8.src.rpm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356
rhbugs@n-dimensional.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |rhbugs@n-dimensional.de Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356
------- Additional Comments From rhbugs@n-dimensional.de 2008-05-03 07:35 EST ------- Going to re-do the review later (first review eaten by crashing Firefox).
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356
rhbugs@n-dimensional.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
------- Additional Comments From rhbugs@n-dimensional.de 2008-05-04 01:41 EST ------- Review Guidelines MUST items: - [OK] rpmlint output: none - [OK] package name - [OK] %{name}.spec - [OK] Packaging Guidelines - [OK] Licensing Guidelines (MIT) - [OK] License Field in spec - [OK] License text in %doc - [OK] Spec file in en_US - [OK] legible spec file - [OK] source matches upstream - [OK] compiles successfully as noarch - [OK] BuildRequires - N/A %find_lang - N/A shared libs - N/A not relocatable - [OK] directory ownership - [OK] no duplicate files in %files - [OK] proper permissions on files, %defattr present - [OK] %clean section cleans %{buildroot} - [OK] consistently uses macros - [OK] package contains code - N/A large docs - [OK] %doc files do not affect runtime behaviour - N/A header files in -devel - N/A static libs in -static - N/A foo.pc files - N/A libfoo.so.1.1 - N/A no devel package - N/A no .la archives - N/A not a GUI app - [OK] Does not own files/dirs owned by other packages - [OK] %install cleans out %{buildroot} first - [OK] all filenames are valid ASCII and thus UTF-8
Review Guidelines SHOULD items: - N/A license text - N/A no translated descriptions available - [OK] builds in mock: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=594044 - N/A noarch package - [OK] appears to work - N/A no scriptlets - N/A no sub-packages - N/A no foo.pc - N/A no file dependencies
Remarks on Python Packaging Guidelines: - [OK] good python_sitelib macro definition - [OK] use %{python_sitelib} - N/A Not an egg, only builds .egg-info - [OK] Includes all byte compiled files
Remarks on Packaging Guidelines: - package uses second allowed choice for BuildRoot: - CFLAGS="%{optflags}"... what for in a noarch package? - desktop file: - as non-GUI app bpython does not need one - it is non-functional - ergo: why not leave it out? If you do decide to add a desktop file starting bpython in a terminal: Please use %{__install}'s -p parameter. I'd change those three, but they are OK as-is.
ACCEPTED.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356
rhbugs@n-dimensional.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rhbugs@n-dimensional.de |nobody@fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356
terjeros@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
------- Additional Comments From terjeros@phys.ntnu.no 2008-05-04 06:31 EST -------
- package uses second allowed choice for BuildRoot:
Ok, will fix.
- CFLAGS="%{optflags}"... what for in a noarch package?
Copy and paste error...
- desktop file:
If you do decide to add a desktop file starting bpython in a terminal: Please use %{__install}'s -p parameter.
- as non-GUI app bpython does not need one
- it is non-functional
- ergo: why not leave it out?
I'd change those three, but they are OK as-is.
Leftover from initial package, will remove desktop file.
I'd change those three, but they are OK as-is. ACCEPTED.
Thanks! Should you change Assigned To:?
New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bpython Short Description: Fancy curses interface to the Python interactive interpreter Owners: terjeros Branches: F-7 F-8 F-9 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356
rhbugs@n-dimensional.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |rhbugs@n-dimensional.de
------- Additional Comments From rhbugs@n-dimensional.de 2008-05-04 08:11 EST ------- Common practise appears to leave the bug assigned to the reviewer.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2008-05-04 13:24 EST ------- cvs done.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: bpython - Fancy Curses Interface To The Python Interactive Interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356
terjeros@phys.ntnu.no changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
------- Additional Comments From terjeros@phys.ntnu.no 2008-05-07 12:45 EST -------
Common practise appears to leave the bug assigned to the reviewer.
I had stale browser cache or something, bug was assigned to Nobody.
Anyway, package pending for testing in F-7, F-8 and F-9 now.
Thanks for help, Hans and Kevin!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356
Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |markmc@redhat.com, | |matt_domsch@dell.com
--- Comment #8 from Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com 2011-08-30 10:55:52 EDT --- terjeros, would you please branch and build bpython for el6? openstack-nova needs it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356
Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #9 from Matt Domsch matt_domsch@dell.com 2011-09-01 14:08:11 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: bpython New Branches: el6 Owners: mdomsch markmc
terjeros has declined to participate in EPEL, but is happy for someone else to maintain it there.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444356
--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limb@jcomserv.net 2011-09-01 14:39:55 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org