Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2 Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info ReportedBy: paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/anjuta2.spec
Description:
Anjuta2 is the new version of the popular IDE, Anjuta
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Anjuta2 |Review Request: Anjuta2 BugsThisDependsOn| |189324
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-22 19:45 EST ------- I am unable to build the package on my x86_64 test rig due to BZ #189324. I will see if I can get it working on an x86
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-27 17:10 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.smmp.salford.ac.uk/packages/anjuta2.spec SRPM : http://www.smmp/salford.ac.uk/packages/anjuta-2.0.1-2.src.rpm
It can only be built without the %{?_smp_flags}. The package builds but breaks when installed and run. I have a feeling that is down to me rather than anything else.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs@math.uh.edu
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2006-04-28 18:16 EST ------- A few odd things:
The specfile you link immediately above isn't the one that's in the srpm.
The specfile should be named according to the base RPM: anjuta.spec. Either that or the package name should be changed to anjuta2.
I notice Anjuta is already in Extras (and you maintain it). Is it your intention to just upgrade the existing version or did you want this package to coexist? If the former, you technically don't need to go through a review, although you probably just want to push the new version for FC6 and leave the old ones alone.
I tried to do a build but it fails:
Cannot find build req gnome-build-devel. Exiting.
I can't seem to find this anywhere.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-04-29 13:05 EST ------- You're right about the spec file, however, I am maintaining the core branch as well which has the filename anjuta.spec already.
The idea is to have anjuta2 in rawhide (co-existing with anjuta) and when it's good and stable, drop anjuta and take anjuta2 to FC4 and 5.
gnome-build is in BZ : #182320
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2006-04-29 14:30 EST ------- The problem is that while the specfile is called anjuta2.spec, the Name: of the generated package is still anjuta. It sounds like you want to call it anjuta2 and eventually add Obsoletes: anjuta.
And of course the BR: gnome-build-devel which I can't satisfy is a major problem.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2006-04-29 14:31 EST ------- Please ignore the last sentence I wrote, lest I seem an idiot. But you should have that bug block this one.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|189324 |182320
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197814
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-06 12:36 EST ------- Now requires autogen to build (submitted as BZ 197814)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
Jochen@herr-schmitt.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|197814 |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-06 17:01 EST ------- Why have you removed 197814 as a depends on when it clearly needs it?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-06 20:29 EST ------- Spec URL: http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/anjuta-2.spec SRPM : http://www.knox.net.nz/~nodoid/anjuta-2.0.2-2.src.rpm
(Okay, I know the src rpm was not built with the anjuta-2 spec file, it is the same file as in the src.rpm, only renamed)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Anjuta2 |Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
lyz27@yahoo.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lyz27@yahoo.com
------- Additional Comments From lyz27@yahoo.com 2006-07-10 18:40 EST ------- Where can I find the anjuta-gdl-devel package?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-07-10 18:44 EST ------- #10 : Rawhide (Fedora Extras development branch). I've not put it into FE5 yet as until Anjuta-2.0.x is released into FE (which may be a while off yet as autogen is giving much grief!), there isn't any point.
Also, if you are raising a bug (or request), can you file it under a different BZ? anjuta-gdl is a different package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
Bug 189685 depends on bug 182320, which changed state.
Bug 182320 Summary: Review Request: gnome-build https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182320
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
jpmahowald@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |197814
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn|197814 |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-10-13 15:07 EST -------
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 210464 ***
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: Anjuta-2.0.x
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189685
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| |
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org