Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: crash-catcher - apps crash detecting daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
Summary: Review Request: crash-catcher - apps crash detecting daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jmoskovc@redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: ---
Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/crash-catcher.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~jmoskovc/crash-catcher-0.0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: CrashCatcher is a tool to help users to detect defects in applications and to create a bug report with all informations needed by maintainer to fix it. It uses plugin system to extend its functionality.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
Jiri Moskovcak jmoskovc@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jlaska@redhat.com, | |zprikryl@redhat.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
Dan Horák dan@danny.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |dan@danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
--- Comment #1 from Dan Horák dan@danny.cz 2009-02-26 03:18:21 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below:
BAD source files match upstream: OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. BAD specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (GPLv2+). License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK* BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. BAD rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths, correct scriptlets exists BAD owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. Ok file permissions are appropriate. BAD scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK* no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. BAD not a GUI app
- full URL to source archive is missing - no need to specify License in all sub-packages, it is inherited from the main package - parallel make is not used (use make %{?_smp_mflags}) - when you decide to create a -devel subpackage, then you must move the libraries from the main package to a -libs sub-package to be multilib compliant - use %{_initddir} instead of /etc/rc.d/init.d - no need to specify BR: glib2-devel, it is resolved automatically via gtkmm24-devel
- rpmlint complains a bit crash-catcher.x86_64: W: no-documentation => mark COPYING and README as %doc
crash-catcher.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libUtils.so crash-catcher.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libMiddleWare.so => you probably want a devel subpackage
crash-catcher.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/rc.d/init.d/crash-catcher crash-catcher.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/rc.d/init.d/crash-catcher => remove %config from the initsctript
crash-catcher.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/sbin/crash-catcher ['/usr/lib64'] crash-catcher.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libMiddleWare.so.0.0.1 ['/usr/lib64'] crash-catcher-addon-ccpp.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/hookCCpp ['/usr/lib64'] => http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Removing_Rpath
crash-catcher-gui.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/crash-catcher/CCMainWindow.py 0644 crash-catcher-gui.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/crash-catcher/CCDBusBackend.py 0644 => drop the shebang lines from the scrips, they are not intended to be run on their own
crash-catcher-gui.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/bin/cc-gui => add it
crash-catcher-addon-ccpp.x86_64: W: no-documentation crash-catcher-applet.x86_64: W: no-documentation crash-catcher-gui.x86_64: W: no-documentation crash-catcher-plugin-logger.x86_64: W: no-documentation crash-catcher-plugin-mailx.x86_64: W: no-documentation crash-catcher-plugin-sqlite3.x86_64: W: no-documentation => can be ignored now
crash-catcher-plugin-mailx.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long => fix
crash-catcher-addon-ccpp.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/crash-catcher/libCCpp.so crash-catcher-plugin-logger.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/crash-catcher/libLogger.so crash-catcher-plugin-mailx.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/crash-catcher/libMailx.so crash-catcher-plugin-sqlite3.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/crash-catcher/libSQLite3.so => link plugins with "-avoid-version" in LDFLAGS, then it is ok to have *.so in a non-devel package
- unowned directories: %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}/plugins %{_libdir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/%{name} first 3 should be owned by the main package, the last one by the -gui sub-package - the preun scriptlet controls rarpd - plugins are usually linked with "-avoid-version" in LDFLAGS - desktop file is missing for the gui
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |awilliam@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com 2009-02-26 13:55:04 EDT --- Here's an updated .src.rpm with fixes for all issues identified by the review. The code fixes are implemented as a patch, which obviously the crash-catcher guys should apply to the code in trac rather than keeping as a patch.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
--- Comment #3 from Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com 2009-02-26 13:55:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=333368) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=333368) Fixed crash-catcher package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
--- Comment #4 from Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com 2009-02-26 13:56:48 EDT --- Oh, except obviously I couldn't fix the tarball location as I'm not a crash-catcher developer :) You guys need to put a download section on the site and put the tarball there.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
--- Comment #5 from Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com 2009-02-26 14:06:42 EDT --- sorry, one more thing - remove 'autoreconf' from the spec once the patch is applied upstream, it's only needed while the patch is touching a Makefile.am.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
--- Comment #6 from Dan Horák dan@danny.cz 2009-03-02 10:03:29 EDT --- few issues are still remaining - %{_libdir}/%{name} is unowned - it should belong to the main package - desktop file for the gui doesn't exist
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
--- Comment #7 from Jiri Moskovcak jmoskovc@redhat.com 2009-03-02 16:01:51 EDT --- Ok, latest update, fixed desktop file, %{_libdir}/%{name} is owned by main package. http://jmoskovc.fedorapeople.org/crash-catcher-0.0.1-10.fc10.src.rpm http://jmoskovc.fedorapeople.org/crash-catcher.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
--- Comment #8 from Adam Williamson awilliam@redhat.com 2009-03-02 18:31:34 EDT --- sorry, somehow I missed those two.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
--- Comment #9 from Dan Horák dan@danny.cz 2009-03-03 03:09:02 EDT --- another round - desktop-file-utils is missing as BR - the main package must use "%dir %{_libdir}/%{name}" in the %files section instead of %{_libdir}/%{name} only - you should replace all occurrences of the string "crash-catcher" with %{name}, it will make it easier to change the name of the package - the package must use a released source archive or follow the guideline for pre-release packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
--- Comment #10 from Jiri Moskovcak jmoskovc@redhat.com 2009-03-03 06:21:04 EDT --- Fixed spec and srpm: http://jmoskovc.fedorapeople.org/crash-catcher-0.0.1-12.fc10.src.rpm http://jmoskovc.fedorapeople.org/crash-catcher.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
--- Comment #11 from Dan Horák dan@danny.cz 2009-03-03 09:10:04 EDT --- resolved issue - source archive available to download and is the same as included in the srpm d026802acb81aa2ec26154fd09361b1c30eb70c9 crash-catcher-0.0.1.tar.gz
remaining issues - the crash-catcher service is on by default - don't use "--vendor fedora" when installing the desktop file and use only %{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop in %files section for the gui subpackage - remove "%{_libdir}/%{name}" from %files section of the libs subpackage, because then the directory and all plugins are incorrectly owned by the libs subpackage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
--- Comment #12 from Jiri Moskovcak jmoskovc@redhat.com 2009-03-03 12:41:29 EDT --- Updated files: http://jmoskovc.fedorapeople.org/crash-catcher-0.0.1-12.fc10.src.rpm http://jmoskovc.fedorapeople.org/crash-catcher.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
Dan Horák dan@danny.cz changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #13 from Dan Horák dan@danny.cz 2009-03-03 13:31:41 EDT --- All issues are fixed, this package is APPROVED.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
--- Comment #14 from Jiri Moskovcak jmoskovc@redhat.com 2009-03-03 13:45:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: abrt Short Description: Automatic bug detection and reporting tool Owners: jmoskovc@redhat.com zprikryl@redhat.com Branches: F-10 F-11
#abrt is a new name for crash-catcher, since it's already a trademark..
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
Jiri Moskovcak jmoskovc@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: abrt - |crash-catcher - apps crash |Automatic bug detection and |detecting daemon |reporting tool Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2009-03-03 15:32:19 EDT --- Please use FAS names in Owners field.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487392
Jiri Moskovcak jmoskovc@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org